Agriculture Update

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Perception as an Indicator of Soft Power:Influence on Extension Services


Affiliations
1 Janta College Bakewar, Etawah (U.P.), India
2 Department of Extension Education, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi (U.P.), India
3 Agricultural Extension Mahayogi Gorakhnath Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Chaukmafi, Gorakhpur (U.P.), India
4 Department of Agricultural Extension and Communication, Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel University of Agriculture and Technology, Modipuram, Meerut (U.P.), India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Soft power is a new form of power, described as the ability to influence other behaviour or ability to shape the preferences of others in such a way that it leads to the achievement of the targeted purpose. In other words, soft power could be seen as the ability to use the power of attraction ability to direct the preference of others a kind of identification and attraction based referent power denoted by perceptions. Therefore, in the present study farmer perception has been selected an indicator soft power and its relationship with agricultural extension services. Present study was conducted on the 220 respondents in two districts of Eastern Uttar Pradesh i.e., Varanasi and Mirzapur. Data were obtained on the basis of interview schedule. The findings of chi-square test indicated that there were no significant differences between most of the extension services provided by public or private sectors which mean famer perception towards public and private extension service were found to be different. Finally, the results indicated that in particular services private sector was found to be better than public sector services. Limitations and future research suggestions were also discussed.

Keywords

Behaviour, Extension Service, Perception, Preference, Soft Power.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Adesina, A.A. and Baidu-Forson, J. (1995). Farmers perceptions and adoption of new agricultural technology: Evidence from analysis in Burkina Faso and Guinea, West Africa.Agric. Econ., 13(1) : 1–9.

  • Coats, P. (1998). Perception and metaphysical skepticism. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society (Supplementary volume), 1–28.

  • Ghimire, N.R. (2010). The relative importance of selected educational process professional competencies to extension educators in the North Central Region of USA (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Iowa State University, Ames.

  • Hoffmann, D.D. (2009). The interface theory of perception: Natural selection drives true perception to swift extinction, In S. Dickinson, M. Tarr, A. Leonardis, & B. Schiele (Eds.), Object categorization and human vision perspectives(pp. 148–165). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

  • Leeper, R. (1935). A study of a neglected portion of the field of learning: The development of sensory organization. Genetic Psychol., 46 : 41–75.

  • Misra, D.C. (1997). Monitoring extension programmes and resources in B.E. Swanson R.P. Bentz, A.J. Sofranko (eds.), Improving agricultural extension. A reference manual (2nd Ed.).

  • Nye, J. (1990). Bound to lead: The changing nature of American Power. Basic Books, NY.

  • Nye, J. (1990). Soft Power. Foreign Policy, 80 (5) : 153-171.

  • Purushothamam, U. (2010). Shifting perceptions of power: Soft Power in India’s Foreign Policy. J. Peace Studies, 17(2 – 3), 12-17. .

  • Sarker, A. and Itohara Y. (2009). Farmers Perception about the Extension Services and Extension Workers: The Case of Organic Agriculture Extension Program: American J. Agric. & Biological Sci., 4(4) : 332-337.

  • Van, L.B., Gemmel, P. and Dierdonck, Roland Van (2003). Services management: an integrated approach. Harlow Financial Times Prentice Hall.


Abstract Views: 197

PDF Views: 0




  • Perception as an Indicator of Soft Power:Influence on Extension Services

Abstract Views: 197  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Abhishek Pratap Singh
Janta College Bakewar, Etawah (U.P.), India
B. Jirli
Department of Extension Education, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi (U.P.), India
Rahul Kumar Singh
Agricultural Extension Mahayogi Gorakhnath Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Chaukmafi, Gorakhpur (U.P.), India
Manoj Kumar
Department of Agricultural Extension and Communication, Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel University of Agriculture and Technology, Modipuram, Meerut (U.P.), India

Abstract


Soft power is a new form of power, described as the ability to influence other behaviour or ability to shape the preferences of others in such a way that it leads to the achievement of the targeted purpose. In other words, soft power could be seen as the ability to use the power of attraction ability to direct the preference of others a kind of identification and attraction based referent power denoted by perceptions. Therefore, in the present study farmer perception has been selected an indicator soft power and its relationship with agricultural extension services. Present study was conducted on the 220 respondents in two districts of Eastern Uttar Pradesh i.e., Varanasi and Mirzapur. Data were obtained on the basis of interview schedule. The findings of chi-square test indicated that there were no significant differences between most of the extension services provided by public or private sectors which mean famer perception towards public and private extension service were found to be different. Finally, the results indicated that in particular services private sector was found to be better than public sector services. Limitations and future research suggestions were also discussed.

Keywords


Behaviour, Extension Service, Perception, Preference, Soft Power.

References