Agriculture Update

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Comparative Study of Sales in Solid Fertilizer and Liquid Fertilizer in Shrirampur Andahmednagar Tahsil


Affiliations
1 College of Agriculture Business Management, Loni, Ahmednagar (M.S.), India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


We studied about sale of solid and liquid fertilizer. This study was conducted between July 2018 to September 2018 on the sample of 12 wholesaler and 18 retailer. From As villages of two talukas of Ahmednagar district, which are Shrirampur and Nagar. Primary data was collected by survey method on pretested semi-structured schedule and appropriate tools were used to analysis of data. Shrirampur taluka has good irrigation facilities while Nagar taluka has not good irrigation facilities. 78 per cent farmers used solid fertilizer and 35 per cent farmers used water soluble fertilizer. Subsidy is available on solid fertilizer. Subsidy provided on water soluble fertilizer so that prices of solid fertilizer are less than water soluble fertilizer. Therefore, sale of water soluble fertilizer is lower than solid fertilizer. Most of the farmers buy solid fertilizer because of its low pricing. So that the sale of solid fertilizer is high than water soluble fertilizer. In addition to liquid fertilizer that can be sold in the market, liquid fertilizer can be use for agriculture purpose or in the premises for plantation ( Unnisa, 2015).

Keywords

Solid Fertilizer, Liquid Fertilizer, Sales, Wholesalers, Retailers.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Amaliyar, Kinjal and Singh, Ritambhara (2016). Study of market potential, farmers buying behaviour and satisfaction level towards water soluble fertilizers in Anand and Narmada district of Gujarat. Internat. J. Res. Business Manag., 4 (9): 27-36.

  • GOI (2011). Annual Report 2010-11, Department of Fertilizers, Ministry of Chemicals and Fertilizers, Government of India, New Delhi, India, pp. 103.

  • GOI (2011a). Interim report of the task force on direct transfer of subsidies on kerosene, LPG and fertilizer, Department of Expenditure, Ministry of Finance, Govt. of India, New Delhi,India, June 2011.

  • GOI (2012). All India report on input survey 2006-07. Agricultural Census Division, Department of Agriculture and Cooperation, Ministry of Agriculture, Government of India, New Delhi, India.

  • GoI (2012a). Rates of P and K fertilizers for 2011-12. Department of Fertilizers, Ministry of Chemicals and Fertilizers, Government of India, New Delhi, India.

  • GOI (2012b). Report of the working group on fertilizer industry for the twelfth five year plan (2012-13 to 206-17), Department of Fertilizers, Ministry of Chemicals and Fertilizers, Govt. of India, New Delhi, India.

  • GOI (2012c). Union budget – Various Issues from 2002-03 to 2012-13. Ministry of Finance, Government of India, New Delhi.

  • Gulati, Ashok (1990). Fertilizer subsidy: Is the cultivator ‘Net subsidised’? Indian J. Agric. Econ., 45( 1): 1-11.

  • Gulati, Ashok and Sharma, Anil (1995). Subsidy syndrome in Indian agriculture, Econ. & Politi. Weekly, 30 (39): A93-A110.

  • Gulati, Ashok and Narayanan, Sudha (2003). The subsidy syndrome in Indian agriculture. Oxford University Press, New Delhi, India.

  • Kothari, C.R. (2009). Research methodology: Methods and techniques, (IInd Revised Ed.), New Age International Publishers, New Delhi, India.

  • Monisha, J.N. (2016). Production and comparison of solidliquid fertilizer from vegetable waste, Internat. J. Innovat. Engg. Res. & Technol., 3 (7): 47-53.

  • Morris, M., Kelly, V. A.,Kopicki, R. and Byerlee, D. (2007). Promoting increased fertilizer use in Africa: Lessons learned and good practice guidelines, World Bank, Washington, DC.

  • Panagariya, Arvind (2001). Fertilizer subsidy. Economic times, February 28, 2001.

  • PIB (2012). Import of fertilizers, Ministry of Chemicals and Fertilizers, Press Information Bureau, Government of India, New Delhi, India.

  • PIB (2012a), Year-wise amount of fertilizer subsidy released during 2009-10 to 2011-12, Ministry of Chemicals and Fertilizers, Press Information Bureau, Government of India, New Delhi, India.

  • Unnisa, Syeda Azeem (2015). Liquid fertilizer from food wasteA Sustainable Approach, 4 (8) : 1-5.


Abstract Views: 331

PDF Views: 0




  • Comparative Study of Sales in Solid Fertilizer and Liquid Fertilizer in Shrirampur Andahmednagar Tahsil

Abstract Views: 331  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

S. D. Patil
College of Agriculture Business Management, Loni, Ahmednagar (M.S.), India
A. S. Kshirsagar
College of Agriculture Business Management, Loni, Ahmednagar (M.S.), India

Abstract


We studied about sale of solid and liquid fertilizer. This study was conducted between July 2018 to September 2018 on the sample of 12 wholesaler and 18 retailer. From As villages of two talukas of Ahmednagar district, which are Shrirampur and Nagar. Primary data was collected by survey method on pretested semi-structured schedule and appropriate tools were used to analysis of data. Shrirampur taluka has good irrigation facilities while Nagar taluka has not good irrigation facilities. 78 per cent farmers used solid fertilizer and 35 per cent farmers used water soluble fertilizer. Subsidy is available on solid fertilizer. Subsidy provided on water soluble fertilizer so that prices of solid fertilizer are less than water soluble fertilizer. Therefore, sale of water soluble fertilizer is lower than solid fertilizer. Most of the farmers buy solid fertilizer because of its low pricing. So that the sale of solid fertilizer is high than water soluble fertilizer. In addition to liquid fertilizer that can be sold in the market, liquid fertilizer can be use for agriculture purpose or in the premises for plantation ( Unnisa, 2015).

Keywords


Solid Fertilizer, Liquid Fertilizer, Sales, Wholesalers, Retailers.

References