Open Access
Subscription Access
Open Access
Subscription Access
Evaluation of Phenotypic and Yield Attributing Traits in Mid Late Pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (l.) Millsp.] Genotypes
Subscribe/Renew Journal
The present investigation was undertaken with a view of identification of superior mid late genotypes of pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.). Millsp.] based on the evaluation of phenotypic and yield attributing traits. The various morphological characters viz., plant height, number of primary and secondary branches and number of leaves per plant were evaluated and mid late genotypes, AKTHR- 2001-18 and AKTHR-2001-01 were found superior over the checks, Asha and PKV-Tara. Similarly, AKTHR-2001-18 and AKTHR-2001-01 mid late genotypes contributed significant increase in yield attributing traits compared to checks which were further used in the crop improvement programme to enhance the productivity of pigeonpea.
Keywords
Pigeonpea, Morphological Traits, Yield Attributing Traits.
Subscription
Login to verify subscription
User
Font Size
Information
- Anonymous (2014). All India area, production and yield of total pulses 2013-14. Agric Statistics at a Glance. pp. 99-100 New Delhi, India.
- Dumbre, A. D. and Deshmukh, R. B. (1983). Association of grain yield and other economic characters in pigeonpea. J. Maharashtra Agric. Univ., 8(1): 86-89.
- Kataria, V.P. and Mishra, C.M. (1993). Effect of genotypes of pigeonpea on the yield attributes and grain yield. Bharatiya Krishi Anusandhan Patr., 8(3): 193-196.
- Kaur, K. (2016). Productivity of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L.) in relation to different genotypes (indeterminate and determinate) and row spacing. MSc Thesis, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, Punjab (India).
- Lal, S.K. and Raina, Rajni (2002). Interrelationship between yield and its component traits in long duration hybrids in pigeonpea. Ann. Agric. Res., 23(1): 101-104.
- More, D.C. (1989). Response of ICPL 87 variety of pigeonpea at a varying plant densities and levels of DAP under summer conditions. M.Sc. (Ag.) Thesis, Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth, Rahuri, M.S. (India).
- Mukewar, A.M. and Muley, D.P. (1974). Correlation studies of some yield compounds in Tur [Cajanus cajan (L.) Mill sp.]. Nagpur. Agril. College Mag., 47:83-87.
- Panse, V.G. and Sukhatme, P.V. (1985). Statistical methods for agricultural workers, Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi, India, pp. 87-89.
- Patel, J.A., Patel, D.B., Nafde, S.D., Zaven, P.P. and Pathak, A.R. (1988). Flowering and pod-setting studies in pigeonpea. Internat. Pigeonpea Newsletter, 8: 6-7.
- Reddy, R.K. and Rao, S.K. (1980). Component analysis of field factors segregating population of pigeonpea. Leg. Res., 3(1): 33-37.
- Senger, S.S. and Sharma, S.K. (2000). Effect of planting technique and phosphorus on pigeonpea. Indian J. Agron., 39 (3): 479-481.
- Singh, A. and Prasad, R. (1987). Short duration varieties of arhar pay well. Seeds & Farms., 11 (8): 19-24.
- Singh, T., Sharma, A. and Alie, F.A. (2009). Morphological traits as selection criteria for yield improvement in mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek]. Leg. Res., 32(1) : 36-40.
- Upadhyaya, I. P. and Saharia, P. (1980). Interrelationship between yield and yield components in pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.]. Indian J. Agric. Sci., 21(1): 43-47.
- Wakankar, S.M. and Yadav, L.N. (1975). Path analysis and yield components in arhar. Indian J. agric. Sci., 9(4): 182- 186.
Abstract Views: 302
PDF Views: 0