Agriculture Update

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

To Compare the Productivity Level of Important Crops between KCC Holders and Non-KCC Holders


Affiliations
1 Department of Agricultural Extension and Communication, Sam Higginbottom University of Agriculture, Technology and Sciences, Allahabad (U.P.), India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The present investigation was conducted in Bikaner district of Rajasthan. Block Bikaner was selected purposively due to its maximum and KCC scheme was prevelant therein. 10 villages were selected purposively from the selected block as KCC scheme was operating therein. 75 KCC holders and 75 KCC non-holders were selected on the basis of probability proporsinate procedure. Thus, total number of respondents were 150. Most of the KCC holders (38.67%) were under middle age group whereas 37.33 per cent KCC holders were under young age group. Most of the holders 58.67 per cent belonged to OBC caste. 45.33 per cent holders were educated from primary to middle school. Majority of KCC holder were big farmers. Annual income of 41.33 per cent KCC holders was 3-6 lakhs. There was highly significant between KCC holder and KCC Non-holders in context of their productivity of (moth, groundnut, cluster bean, wheat, mustard and gram).

Keywords

KCC, Comparison, Productivity, Important Crop.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Abu, G. A. (2012). Comparative productivity under special crop programme in Benue State, Nigeria: a case of participant and non-participant soybean growers. J. Cereals & Oilseeds, 3 (4) : 48-55.

  • Kannan, Elumalai (2011). Relationship between agricultural credit policy, credit disbursements and crop productivity: A study in Karnataka. Indian J. Agric. Econ., 66 (3) : 444-456.

  • Mohindra, Versha and Kaur, Gain (2012). Total factor productivity of regional rural banks in India: A Malmquist approach. Commerce & Mgmt., 1 (3) : 75-86.

  • Rai, R. K. and Singh, S. K. (2012). Impact of diversification on income and employment of self-help groups through micro-credit. International J. Commerce & Business Mgmt., 5(1): 58-63.

  • Sajane, A.M., Basavaraja, H., Guledgudda, S.S., Patil, B.L., Mahajanashetty, S.B. and Bhat, A.R.S. (2011). Economic evaluation of Kisan Credit Card Scheme. Karnataka J. Agric. Sci., 24 (2) : 173-176.

  • Samantara, Samir (2010). KisanCreditCard -A study.National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development, Mumbai, 52: 15 - 64 .


Abstract Views: 299

PDF Views: 0




  • To Compare the Productivity Level of Important Crops between KCC Holders and Non-KCC Holders

Abstract Views: 299  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Amit Kumar Keshri
Department of Agricultural Extension and Communication, Sam Higginbottom University of Agriculture, Technology and Sciences, Allahabad (U.P.), India
D. K. Bose
Department of Agricultural Extension and Communication, Sam Higginbottom University of Agriculture, Technology and Sciences, Allahabad (U.P.), India
E. P. K. Das
Department of Agricultural Extension and Communication, Sam Higginbottom University of Agriculture, Technology and Sciences, Allahabad (U.P.), India

Abstract


The present investigation was conducted in Bikaner district of Rajasthan. Block Bikaner was selected purposively due to its maximum and KCC scheme was prevelant therein. 10 villages were selected purposively from the selected block as KCC scheme was operating therein. 75 KCC holders and 75 KCC non-holders were selected on the basis of probability proporsinate procedure. Thus, total number of respondents were 150. Most of the KCC holders (38.67%) were under middle age group whereas 37.33 per cent KCC holders were under young age group. Most of the holders 58.67 per cent belonged to OBC caste. 45.33 per cent holders were educated from primary to middle school. Majority of KCC holder were big farmers. Annual income of 41.33 per cent KCC holders was 3-6 lakhs. There was highly significant between KCC holder and KCC Non-holders in context of their productivity of (moth, groundnut, cluster bean, wheat, mustard and gram).

Keywords


KCC, Comparison, Productivity, Important Crop.

References