Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Impact of Frontline Demonstrations on the Yield and Economic of Pea in West Kameng District Arunachal Pradesh


Affiliations
1 Krishi Vigyan Kendra, West Kaameng (Arunachal Pradesh), India
2 National Horticultural Research and Development Foundation, Patna (Bihar), India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The study was carried out during 2014 to 2017 at farmers field of dirang,West Kameng district of Arunacahal Pradesh. The front line demonstration on pea crop of seed was conducted on an area 18 ha for each variety with active participation of 40 farmers with improved technologies of VRP- 22, Arkel and Azad P1. The results revealed that maximum yield 23.0q/ha with an increase over variety Arkel and Azad P1. Improved technology of pea recorded progressively increased average yield 20q/ ha during Three years of study, and minimum to maximum yield found17.0q/ha to 23.0 q/ha. The extension gap can be bridged by popularizing package of practices of pea including improved variety (VRP-22), use of optimum seed rate, balanced nutrition and recommended plant protection measures. Improved technologies gave higher net return of Rs. 40,000/ha with benefit cost ratio 2.43 as compared to Azad P1 (Rs.29,800/- benefit cost ratio 2.06) and Arkel (Rs.1.94/-benefit cost ratio1.94).

Keywords

Pea, Yield, Improved Technology, Benefit Cost Ratio.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Choudhary, B.N. (1999).Krishi Vigyan Kendra: Aguide of KVK managers, Publication division of Agricultural, extension ICAR. pp. 73-78.
  • Kirar, B.S., Naeshine, R. Gupta, A.K. and Mukherji, S.C. (2006). Demonstration: An effective toel for increasing the productivity of Urd. Ins. Res. J. Extn. Edu., 6 (3) : 47-48
  • Prasad, C., Chaudhary, B.N. and Nayar, B.B. (1987). First line transfer of technology project. ICAR, New Delhi, pp. 87.
  • Raj, A.D., Yadev, V. and Rathod, J.H. (2013). Impact of front line demonstration (FLD) on the yield of pulses. Internat. J. Sci. & Res., 9 (3):1-4.
  • Singh, P.K. (2002). Impact of participants in planning on adoption of new technology through FLD. Manage Extension ResearchReview. July-Dec.45-48pp.
  • Tomar, R.K.S., Sharma, P. and Yadev, L.N. (1991). Comparison of yield and economics of irrigated pea under improved and local management practices. Internat. Pea, Chick Pea News Letter, 6 : 2-3.

Abstract Views: 297

PDF Views: 0




  • Impact of Frontline Demonstrations on the Yield and Economic of Pea in West Kameng District Arunachal Pradesh

Abstract Views: 297  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

T. S. Mishra
Krishi Vigyan Kendra, West Kaameng (Arunachal Pradesh), India
H. M. Singh
National Horticultural Research and Development Foundation, Patna (Bihar), India
N. K. Mishra
Krishi Vigyan Kendra, West Kaameng (Arunachal Pradesh), India
V. K. Mishra
Krishi Vigyan Kendra, West Kaameng (Arunachal Pradesh), India
N. D. Singh
Krishi Vigyan Kendra, West Kaameng (Arunachal Pradesh), India

Abstract


The study was carried out during 2014 to 2017 at farmers field of dirang,West Kameng district of Arunacahal Pradesh. The front line demonstration on pea crop of seed was conducted on an area 18 ha for each variety with active participation of 40 farmers with improved technologies of VRP- 22, Arkel and Azad P1. The results revealed that maximum yield 23.0q/ha with an increase over variety Arkel and Azad P1. Improved technology of pea recorded progressively increased average yield 20q/ ha during Three years of study, and minimum to maximum yield found17.0q/ha to 23.0 q/ha. The extension gap can be bridged by popularizing package of practices of pea including improved variety (VRP-22), use of optimum seed rate, balanced nutrition and recommended plant protection measures. Improved technologies gave higher net return of Rs. 40,000/ha with benefit cost ratio 2.43 as compared to Azad P1 (Rs.29,800/- benefit cost ratio 2.06) and Arkel (Rs.1.94/-benefit cost ratio1.94).

Keywords


Pea, Yield, Improved Technology, Benefit Cost Ratio.

References