Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Impact of Demonstrations of Farmers Fields in Agro Climatic Zone II-A of Rajasthan


Affiliations
1 Agricultural Research Station, Fatehpur-Shekhawati, Sikar, Rajasthan, India
2 Agricultural Research Station, Fatehpur-Shekhawati, Sikar (Rajasthan), India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


An attempt has been made to study on impact of demonstration on farmers fields in adopted villages of Sikar district. The yield gap, input gap, cost and return were calculated for purpose of the study. The survey covered 40 farmers from 4 adopted villages where wheat, barley, gram and mustard demonstration (full technology) were conducted in adopted villages. In each village, 10 demonstrations were conducted. From each village, 10 farmers were selected who have adopted traditional practices for crop cultivation. The results indicated that yield gap per hectare between demonstration plots and farmers practices was 15.71, 23.70, 29.17 and 20.00 per cent for wheat, barley, gram and mustard, respectively. On farmers practices, overall inputs gap was about 21 per cent for wheat, barley and mustard and 33 per cent for gram as compared to demonstration. Thus, there is more scope to raise the mustard, gram, barley and wheat productivity by improving the techniques of production rather than by raising the input use levels. The results further revealed that the cost of cultivation per hectare on demonstration plots was Rs. 16854, Rs. 15110, Rs. 13622 and Rs. 12415 for wheat, barley, gram and mustard while on farmers fields it was Rs. 13883, Rs. 12445, Rs. 10301 and Rs. 10227 for wheat, barley, mustard and gram, respectively. The net return per hectare was the highest for mustard followed by wheat, barley and gram. While on farmers practices, it was highest for wheat followed by mustard, barley and gram. The increase of net return on demonstration plots over farmers' practices was 26.79, 24.75, 19.25 and 9.43 per cent for barley, gram, mustard and wheat, respectively.

Keywords

Impact, Demonstrations, Agro Climatic Zone.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Jaiswal, P.K. and Duboliya, S.R. (1994). Adoption gap in wheat technology. Maharashtra J. Extn. Edu., 13: 63-66.
  • Jaiswal, P.K., Mishra, P.K. and Mishra, A. (1987). Adoption and gap of recommended wheat technology among the farmers of Bundelkhand Region. Maharashtra J. Extn. Edu., 6: 205-205.
  • Mitra, B. and Samajdar, T. (2010). Yield gap analysis of rapeseed-mustard through front line demonstration. Agril. Extn. Rev., 22: 16-17.
  • Sharma, B.L. and Sharma R.N. (2003). Technological gaps and constraints in gram production in semi-arid region of Rajasthan. Rajasthan J. Extn. Edu., 11: 59-62.
  • Singh, G., Sirohi, A. and Malik, Y.P. (2008). Impact of improved technology on the productivity of Indian mustard. J. Oilseeds Res., 25: 125.
  • Singh, R.K.,Gaur, R.B., Verma, R.S. and Yadav, D.K. (2000). Evaluation of front line demonstration to identify adoption gaps in chickpea production in irrigated condition of Sriganganagar district. Indian J. Pulses Res., 13 (1):28-30.
  • Singh, R.K., Gaur, R.B., Verma, R.S., Yadav, D.K., Singh, Vichiter and Prakash, V. (2002). Evaluating gaps in transfer of technology in chickpea front line demonstrations in semi arid region of Rajasthan. Haryana J. Agron.,18 (1&2): 110-114.
  • Singh, S.N., Singh, V.K., Singh, R.K. and Singh, Rakesh K. (2007). Evaluation of on-farm front line demonstrations on the yield of mustard in Central Plains Zone of Uttar Pradesh. Indian Res. J. Extn. Edu., 7: 79-81.
  • Tiwari, K.B. and Saxena, A. (2001). Economic analysis of FLD of oilseed in Chhindwara. Bhartiya Krishi Anusandhan Patrika,16: 185-189.
  • Tiwari, R.B., Singh, Vinay and Parihar, P. (2003). Role of FLD in transfer of gram production technology. Maharashtra J. Extn. Edu., 22: 139.
  • Verma, Dayanand R.K. and Mehta, S.M. (2011). Performance of chickpea variety GNG-663 in front line demonstration under irrigated condition. Ann. Agric. Res., 32(3&2):73-76.

Abstract Views: 456

PDF Views: 2




  • Impact of Demonstrations of Farmers Fields in Agro Climatic Zone II-A of Rajasthan

Abstract Views: 456  |  PDF Views: 2

Authors

B. L. Sharma
Agricultural Research Station, Fatehpur-Shekhawati, Sikar, Rajasthan, India
K. C. Sharma
Agricultural Research Station, Fatehpur-Shekhawati, Sikar (Rajasthan), India

Abstract


An attempt has been made to study on impact of demonstration on farmers fields in adopted villages of Sikar district. The yield gap, input gap, cost and return were calculated for purpose of the study. The survey covered 40 farmers from 4 adopted villages where wheat, barley, gram and mustard demonstration (full technology) were conducted in adopted villages. In each village, 10 demonstrations were conducted. From each village, 10 farmers were selected who have adopted traditional practices for crop cultivation. The results indicated that yield gap per hectare between demonstration plots and farmers practices was 15.71, 23.70, 29.17 and 20.00 per cent for wheat, barley, gram and mustard, respectively. On farmers practices, overall inputs gap was about 21 per cent for wheat, barley and mustard and 33 per cent for gram as compared to demonstration. Thus, there is more scope to raise the mustard, gram, barley and wheat productivity by improving the techniques of production rather than by raising the input use levels. The results further revealed that the cost of cultivation per hectare on demonstration plots was Rs. 16854, Rs. 15110, Rs. 13622 and Rs. 12415 for wheat, barley, gram and mustard while on farmers fields it was Rs. 13883, Rs. 12445, Rs. 10301 and Rs. 10227 for wheat, barley, mustard and gram, respectively. The net return per hectare was the highest for mustard followed by wheat, barley and gram. While on farmers practices, it was highest for wheat followed by mustard, barley and gram. The increase of net return on demonstration plots over farmers' practices was 26.79, 24.75, 19.25 and 9.43 per cent for barley, gram, mustard and wheat, respectively.

Keywords


Impact, Demonstrations, Agro Climatic Zone.

References