Agriculture Update

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Adoption of Recommended Soil and Water Conservation Practices Among the Beneficiaries of Sujala Watershed Project in Northern Karnataka


Affiliations
1 Department of Agricultural Extension Education, College of Agriculture, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad (Karnataka), India
2 Department of Agricultural Economics, College of Agriculture, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad (Karnataka), India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The study conducted during 2012-2013 in Haveri and Dharwad districts of Karnataka state where in Sujala watershed project was implemented during 2001 to 2007. The distribution of beneficiaries and nonbeneficiaries in adoption of recommended soil and water conservation practices shows that highest per cent of beneficiaries (86.25%) as compared to non-beneficiaries (57.50%) adopted shrub check. More number of beneficiaries adopted water ways (65.00%), boulder bund (62.50%), dugout or water recharge pit (58.75%) and vegetative bunds (52.50%) as compared to non-beneficiaries (23.75%, 43.75%, 27.50% and 26.25%, respectively). Around one-third of beneficiaries adopted sunken ponds (38.75%) and farm pond (30.00%) as compared to nonbeneficiaries (13.75% and 16.25%, respectively). Adoption of contour bund, rubble check, contour strip and staggered contour trench was noticed with very less per cent of beneficiaries (12.50%, 8.75%, 6.25% and 6.25%, respectively). But none of the non-beneficiaries adopted contour bund, contour strip and staggered contour trench. The overall distribution reveals that, high per cent of beneficiaries were noticed in high and medium adoption category (43.75% and 40.00%, respectively) as compared to non-beneficiaries (20.00% and 27.50%, respectively). Low adoption category was observed with more number of non-beneficiaries (52.50%) as compared to beneficiaries (16.25%). The extent of adoption amongst beneficiaries was positively correlated with land holding, extension participation, annual family income, awareness of soil erosion problems and accessibility to farm implements and the age was noticed to be negatively correlated. And amongst non-beneficiaries only annual family income was positively correlated with adoption of soil and water conservation practices Whereas, the education, farming system, family type, perception of usefulness of practices, achievement motivation and risk orientation were not related with the adoption of soil and water conservation practices among both beneficiaries and non-beneficiaries.

Keywords

Beneficiaries, Adoption, Soil, Water Conservation Practices, Sujala Watershed Project.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Amsalu, A. and Graaff, J. (2006). Farmers' views of soil erosion problems and their conservation knowledge at Beressa watershed, central highland of Ethiopia. Agric. & Human Values, 23 : 99-108.

  • Biradar, B. (2008). A study on impact of income generating activities on sustainable rural livelihoods of KAWAD project beneficiaries. M. Sc. (Ag.) Thesis, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad, KARNATAKA (INDIA).

  • Budry Bayard, Curtis, M.J. and Dennis, Shannon A. (2006). The adoption and management of soil conservation practices in fort- Jacques capital of Haiti : the case of rock walls. Agric. Econ. Rev., 7 (2): 28-39.

  • Chandra, Charan V., Syed, Sadaqath and Hirevenkanagoudar, L.V., (2007). Adoption of watershed practices by the respondents of Sujala watershed, Karnataka J. Agric. Sci., 20(1): 176-177.

  • Dakhore, K.M., Mahajan, B.S. and Digraskar, S.V. (1993). Adoption of dry land technology by farmers. Maharashtra J. Extn. Edu., 12: 215.

  • Gupta, Vinod, Rai, P. K. and Nanda, Rakesh (2009). Soil conservation competencies of the farmers in the watershed area of Vijaypur block of Jammu, India, Indian Res. J. Extn. Edu., 9 (2): 125-128.

  • Hemalatha, B. Surekha, S. and Nagaraja, N. (1996). A study on knowledge of farmers about watershed development. Karnataka J. Agric. Sci., 9: 666-669.

  • Kadam, J.R., Patil, V.G. and Hardikar, D.P. (2001). Knowledge and adoption of soil and water conservation practices in watershed development project. Maharashtra J. Extn. Edu., 20: 138-140.

  • Lapar, M., Lucila, A. and Pandey, S. (1999). Adoption of soil conservation : the case of Phillippine uplands. Agric. Econ., 21: 241-256.

  • Madhavareddy, K.V. (2001). Peoples' participation in watershed development programme implemented by Government and non-government organization - A comparative analysis. M.Sc. (Ag.) Thesis,University of Agricultural Sciences, Bengaluru, KARNATAKA (INDIA).

  • Omprakash, Sinha, Lakhan, Mishra, A.S. and Vishwanatham, M. K. (1998). Constraints in adoption of soil conservation measures by the farmers of Doon Valley. Indian J. Soil Cons, 26(1): 48-51.

  • Raghavendra, H.C. (2004). A study on knowledge and adoption level of soil and water conservation practices by farmers in northern Karnataka. M.Sc. (Ag.) Thesis, Thesis, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad, KARNATAKA (INDIA).

  • Ravi Shankar, K., Subrahmanyam, K.V., Reddy, B.M.K. and Sharma, K.D. (2007). Farmer's perception and adoption patterns of soil and water conservation measures : A case in Nalgonda district of Andhra Pradesh. Indian J. Dryland Agric. Res. & Dev., 22(2): 197-200.

  • Reddy, Ninga (2005). A study on knowledge, extent of participation and benefits derived by participant farmers of the watershed development programme in Raichur district of Karnataka state. M.Sc. (Ag.) Thesis, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad, KARNATAKA (INDIA).

  • Sisodia, S. S. and Sharma, C. (2008). Constraints faced by the farmers in adoption of watershed development programme, Udaipur, Rajasthan, Indian Res. J. Extn. Edu. 8(1): 60-62.

  • Tenge, A.J., De Graff, J. and Hella, J.P. (2004). Social and economic factors affecting the adoption of soil and water conservation behaviours in the west Usambara Highlands, Tanzania. Land Degrad. Dev., 15: 99-114.

  • Thiranjangowda, B. (2005). A study on cultivation and marketing pattern selected cut flower in Belgaum district of Karnataka. M. Sc. (Ag.) Thesis, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad, KARNATAKA (INDIA).

  • Yadav, J.P. (2012). Correlates of adoption of watershed technology of NWDPRA Jaipur region of Rajasthan. Indian Res. J. Extn. Edu., 1: 211-216.


Abstract Views: 484

PDF Views: 2




  • Adoption of Recommended Soil and Water Conservation Practices Among the Beneficiaries of Sujala Watershed Project in Northern Karnataka

Abstract Views: 484  |  PDF Views: 2

Authors

Mithun P. Kudachi
Department of Agricultural Extension Education, College of Agriculture, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad (Karnataka), India
A. Bheemappa
Department of Agricultural Extension Education, College of Agriculture, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad (Karnataka), India
Shreeshail Rudrapur
Department of Agricultural Economics, College of Agriculture, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad (Karnataka), India
Anil Biradar
Department of Agricultural Extension Education, College of Agriculture, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad (Karnataka), India

Abstract


The study conducted during 2012-2013 in Haveri and Dharwad districts of Karnataka state where in Sujala watershed project was implemented during 2001 to 2007. The distribution of beneficiaries and nonbeneficiaries in adoption of recommended soil and water conservation practices shows that highest per cent of beneficiaries (86.25%) as compared to non-beneficiaries (57.50%) adopted shrub check. More number of beneficiaries adopted water ways (65.00%), boulder bund (62.50%), dugout or water recharge pit (58.75%) and vegetative bunds (52.50%) as compared to non-beneficiaries (23.75%, 43.75%, 27.50% and 26.25%, respectively). Around one-third of beneficiaries adopted sunken ponds (38.75%) and farm pond (30.00%) as compared to nonbeneficiaries (13.75% and 16.25%, respectively). Adoption of contour bund, rubble check, contour strip and staggered contour trench was noticed with very less per cent of beneficiaries (12.50%, 8.75%, 6.25% and 6.25%, respectively). But none of the non-beneficiaries adopted contour bund, contour strip and staggered contour trench. The overall distribution reveals that, high per cent of beneficiaries were noticed in high and medium adoption category (43.75% and 40.00%, respectively) as compared to non-beneficiaries (20.00% and 27.50%, respectively). Low adoption category was observed with more number of non-beneficiaries (52.50%) as compared to beneficiaries (16.25%). The extent of adoption amongst beneficiaries was positively correlated with land holding, extension participation, annual family income, awareness of soil erosion problems and accessibility to farm implements and the age was noticed to be negatively correlated. And amongst non-beneficiaries only annual family income was positively correlated with adoption of soil and water conservation practices Whereas, the education, farming system, family type, perception of usefulness of practices, achievement motivation and risk orientation were not related with the adoption of soil and water conservation practices among both beneficiaries and non-beneficiaries.

Keywords


Beneficiaries, Adoption, Soil, Water Conservation Practices, Sujala Watershed Project.

References