Agriculture Update

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Decomposition Analysis of Income Difference Between Border Strip Irrigation and Flood Irrigation in Cultivation of Chickpea in Malaprabha Command Area of Karnataka


Affiliations
1 Department of Agricultural Economics, College of Agriculture, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad (Karnataka), India
2 Department of Agricultural Business Management, College of Agriculture, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad (Karnataka), India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The present study was conducted in the Malaprabha command area as many scientific irrigation methods were implemented by the RKVY project. The required data were collected from the 35 farmers each practicing border strip method of irrigation (scientific) and flood methods of irrigation (traditional) in the cultivation of chickpea. The study revealed that the adopters of scientific irrigation technology produced 16.89 per cent higher income from border strip method of irrigation than flood irrigation. The increase in the income was further decomposed into different sources of change such as adoption of scientific irrigation technology and changed input levels. The scientific irrigation technology alone could contribute 9.37 per cent increase in income, while the contribution of change in input levels was also found to be positive (7.52 %). Amongst the various inputs, seed (-0.04 %), fertiliser (-1.01 %) and cost of irrigation (-3.67 %) contributed negatively whereas human labour (6.35%), bullock and machine labour (5.72 %) and FYM (0.17 %) contributed positively to the income.

Keywords

Border Strip Method of Irrigation, Decomposition Analysis, Flood Irrigation.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Bisaliah, S. (1977). Decomposition analysis of output change under new production technology in wheat farming - some implications to returns on investment. Indian J. Agric. Econ., 32(3): 193-201.

  • Cobb, C.W. and Douglas, P.H. (1928). A theory of production. Supplement, Papers and Proceedings of the Fortieth Annual Meeting of the American Economic Association. American Econ. Rev., 18(1):139-165.

  • Gaddi, G.M., Mundinamani, S.M. and Patil, S.A. (2002). Yield gaps, constraints and potential in chickpea production in North Karnataka - An econometric analysis. Indian J. Agric. Econ., 57(4): 722-734.

  • Kumar, Vinod (2001). Decomposition analysis of output change under new production technology in dairy farming. Indian J. Anim. Sci., 71(10): 966-969.

  • Mohan, H.P. (2009). Impact of IPM technology on chickpea and paddy production in Haveri district-an economic analysis. M.Sc. (Ag.) Thesis, University of Agricultural Sciences Dharwad, KARNATAKA (INDIA).

  • Reddy, J.M. (1980). Irrigation system improvement by simulation and optimization. Ph.D. diss. Fort Collins, Colorado State University, COLO.

  • Reddy, J.M. and Clyma, W. (1981). Optimal design of border irrigation systems. J. Irrig. & Drain. Div. ASCE, 107(3): 289-306.

  • Shatanawi, M.R. and Strelkoff, T. (1984). Management contours for border irrigation. J. Irrig. & Drain. Engg., ASCE, 110(4): 393-399.


Abstract Views: 462

PDF Views: 2




  • Decomposition Analysis of Income Difference Between Border Strip Irrigation and Flood Irrigation in Cultivation of Chickpea in Malaprabha Command Area of Karnataka

Abstract Views: 462  |  PDF Views: 2

Authors

Shreeshail Rudrapur
Department of Agricultural Economics, College of Agriculture, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad (Karnataka), India
B. L. Patil
Department of Agricultural Economics, College of Agriculture, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad (Karnataka), India
R. A. Yeledhalli
Department of Agricultural Business Management, College of Agriculture, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad (Karnataka), India

Abstract


The present study was conducted in the Malaprabha command area as many scientific irrigation methods were implemented by the RKVY project. The required data were collected from the 35 farmers each practicing border strip method of irrigation (scientific) and flood methods of irrigation (traditional) in the cultivation of chickpea. The study revealed that the adopters of scientific irrigation technology produced 16.89 per cent higher income from border strip method of irrigation than flood irrigation. The increase in the income was further decomposed into different sources of change such as adoption of scientific irrigation technology and changed input levels. The scientific irrigation technology alone could contribute 9.37 per cent increase in income, while the contribution of change in input levels was also found to be positive (7.52 %). Amongst the various inputs, seed (-0.04 %), fertiliser (-1.01 %) and cost of irrigation (-3.67 %) contributed negatively whereas human labour (6.35%), bullock and machine labour (5.72 %) and FYM (0.17 %) contributed positively to the income.

Keywords


Border Strip Method of Irrigation, Decomposition Analysis, Flood Irrigation.

References