Agriculture Update

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Impact of Front Line Demonstrations on Soybean in Tribal Belt of Gujarat


Affiliations
1 Krushi Vigyan Kendra, (NAU) Dediapada (Gujarat), India
2 Krushi Vigyan Kendra, (NAU) Dediapada (Gujarat)
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The study was carried out during Kharif season of 2012 and 2013 in ten villages of Narmada district. In all 27 demonstrations on soybean crop were carried out in area of 10 ha with the active participation of farmers with the objective to demonstrate the latest technology of soybean production with suitable variety 'JS-335'. The results revealed that FLD recorded higher yield as compared to farmers practice over the years of study. The improved technology recorded average yield of 1666 kg/ha which was 17.8 per cent higher than that obtained with farmers practice of 1415 kg/ha. In spite of increase in yield of soybean, technological gap, extension gap and technology index existed which was 134, 251 kg/ha and 7.4 per cent, respectively. The improved technology gave higher gross return of 51614 Rs./ha, net return of 39386 Rs./ha with benefit cost ratio 4.2 as compared to local check (43846 Rs./ha, 31618 Rs./ha and benefit cost ratio 3.6, respectively).

Keywords

Front Line Demonstrations, Soybean, Tribal Belt.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Dhaka, B.L., Meena, B.S. and Suwalka, R.L. (2010). Popularization of improved maize production technology through frontline demonstrations in South-eastern Rajasthan. J. Agric. Sci.,1 (1): 39-42.

  • Directorate of Economics and Statistics (2012). Department of Agricultural and Co-operation, Agricultural at a glance 2012, pp. 103.

  • Haque, M.S. (2000). Impact of compact block demonstration on increase in productivity of rice. Maharashtra J.Extn. Edu., 19 (1):22-27.

  • Hiremath, S. M. and Nagaraju, M.V. (2010). Evaluation of onfarm front line demonstrations on the yield of chilli. Karnataka J. Agric. Sci., 23(2): 341-342.

  • Jeengar, K.L., Panwar, P. and Pareek, O.P. (2006). Front line demonstration on maize in Bhilwara district of Rajsthan. Curr. Agric., 30(1/2): 115-116.

  • Kumar, A., Kumar, R., Yadav, V.P.S. and Kumar, R. (2010). Impact assessment of Frontline Demonstrations of Bajra in Haryana State. Indian Res. J. Extn. Edu.,10 (1): 105-108.

  • Mishra, D.K., Paliwal, D.K., Tailor, R.S. and Deshwal, A.K. (2009). Impact of frontline demonstrations on yield enhancement of potato. Indian Res. J. Extn. Edu., 9 (3): 26-28 .

  • Mukherjee N. (2003). Participatory, learning and action. Concept, Publishing Company, NEW DELHI, INDIA.

  • Raj, A.D., Yadav, V. and Rathod, J.H. (2013). Impact of front line demonstrations (FLD) on the yield of pulses. Internat. J. Scientific & Res. Public., 3(9): 1-4.

  • Samui, S.K., Maitra, S., Roy, D.K., Mondal, A.K. and Saha, D. (2000). Evaluation on front line demonstration on groundnut (Arachis hypogea L.). J. Indian Soc. Coastal Agric. Res., 18: 180-183.

  • Tiwari, R.B., Singh, V. and Parihar, P. (2003). Role of front line demonstration in transfer of gram production technology. Maharashtra J. Extn. Edu., 22 (1): 19.


Abstract Views: 344

PDF Views: 2




  • Impact of Front Line Demonstrations on Soybean in Tribal Belt of Gujarat

Abstract Views: 344  |  PDF Views: 2

Authors

A. D. Raj
Krushi Vigyan Kendra, (NAU) Dediapada (Gujarat), India
V. Yadav
Krushi Vigyan Kendra, (NAU) Dediapada (Gujarat), India
H. R. Jadav
Krushi Vigyan Kendra, (NAU) Dediapada (Gujarat), India
J. H. Rathod
Krushi Vigyan Kendra, (NAU) Dediapada (Gujarat)

Abstract


The study was carried out during Kharif season of 2012 and 2013 in ten villages of Narmada district. In all 27 demonstrations on soybean crop were carried out in area of 10 ha with the active participation of farmers with the objective to demonstrate the latest technology of soybean production with suitable variety 'JS-335'. The results revealed that FLD recorded higher yield as compared to farmers practice over the years of study. The improved technology recorded average yield of 1666 kg/ha which was 17.8 per cent higher than that obtained with farmers practice of 1415 kg/ha. In spite of increase in yield of soybean, technological gap, extension gap and technology index existed which was 134, 251 kg/ha and 7.4 per cent, respectively. The improved technology gave higher gross return of 51614 Rs./ha, net return of 39386 Rs./ha with benefit cost ratio 4.2 as compared to local check (43846 Rs./ha, 31618 Rs./ha and benefit cost ratio 3.6, respectively).

Keywords


Front Line Demonstrations, Soybean, Tribal Belt.

References