Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Economics and Gap Analysis in Isabgol Cultivation Through Frontline Demonstrations in Barmer District


Affiliations
1 Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Barmer (Rajasthan), India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


To increase the productivity of Isabgol (Plantago ovata), high yielding isabgol variety RI 89 was evaluated at farmer's field during Rabi 2010-11. Thirty demonstrations were conducted at farmer's field at village Balera, Katarala, Rohilla, Bhilo ki Basti, Golia Jaitmal, Bhimda and Nand. Grain yield of Isabgol variety RI 89 under improved practices was 8.32q/ha increased significantly by 25 per cent over farmers practice (control). In terms of monitory return, the net gain per hectare was Rs. 28780/-and was Rs. 6500/-higher by investing additionally Rs. 2300/-. During this period extension activity like field days, farmer's trainings, literature, short messages services, diagnostic visits etc were undertaken which benefitted the farmers. With the improved package of practices fetched a higher B:C ratio of 2.25 while farmers practice gave 2.16. The yield range in improved practice was 4.85 q/ha-10.44 q/ha while under farmers practice it ranged from 4.05 q/ha to 8.28 q/ha. In improved package of practices, input supplied to farmers were improved seed, seed treatment chemicals and bio fertilizers particularly phosphate solubilizing bacteria. During crop period and after harvest the crop period the reaction of farmers about critical input supplied under demonstration was asked and they replied good seed germination and early maturity of the variety than local seeds. While the farmers suggested shattering tolerance varieties should be developed and major constrains was the unavailability of newly released seeds on time.

Keywords

Gap Analysis, Economics of Isabgil, Frontline Demonstrations.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Chauchan, N.M. (2011). Impact and yield fissures inspection of gram through trainings and FLD's by KVK Tapi in Gujarat. Indian J. Agric. Res. & Extn., 4: 12-15.
  • Choudhary, M.L. and Pagaria, P. (2012). Demonstration-an effective technology for increasing the productivity of cumin. Agric. Update, 7 (1&2): 99-101.
  • Das, P.K. and Willey, R.W. (1991). A farmers participatory approach to the development of improved, sustainable technologies for the resource-poor rainfed areas of the eastern plateau of India. Extension strategies for rainfed agriculture. Ed. Indian Society of Extension Education. NEW DELHI, INDIA.
  • Khan, P. M. and Chouhan, J. (2005). Demonstration-an effective technology for increasing the productivity of gram. Indian Res. J. Extn. Edu., 16: 221-223.
  • Singh, P.K. and Varshney, Jay G. (2010). Adoption level and constraints in coriander production technology. Indian Res. J. Extn. Edu., 10(1): 91-94.
  • Veerasamy, S., Satpathy, C. and Rao, G.A. (2003). Constraints of coriander production in orissa. Indian Res. J. Extn. Edu., 33(1&2):58-63.
  • Verma, A.K., Meena, R.R., Dhakar, S.D. and Suwalka, R.L. (2010). Assessment of coriander cultivation practices in Jhalawar district. Souvenir, National Seminar on Precision Farming in Horticulture, 686-689pp.
  • Vital Agriculture Statistics (2010-11). Govt. of Rajasthan, RAJASTHAN, INDIA.

Abstract Views: 394

PDF Views: 2




  • Economics and Gap Analysis in Isabgol Cultivation Through Frontline Demonstrations in Barmer District

Abstract Views: 394  |  PDF Views: 2

Authors

Pradeep Pagaria
Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Barmer (Rajasthan), India
S. L. Kantwa
Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Barmer (Rajasthan), India

Abstract


To increase the productivity of Isabgol (Plantago ovata), high yielding isabgol variety RI 89 was evaluated at farmer's field during Rabi 2010-11. Thirty demonstrations were conducted at farmer's field at village Balera, Katarala, Rohilla, Bhilo ki Basti, Golia Jaitmal, Bhimda and Nand. Grain yield of Isabgol variety RI 89 under improved practices was 8.32q/ha increased significantly by 25 per cent over farmers practice (control). In terms of monitory return, the net gain per hectare was Rs. 28780/-and was Rs. 6500/-higher by investing additionally Rs. 2300/-. During this period extension activity like field days, farmer's trainings, literature, short messages services, diagnostic visits etc were undertaken which benefitted the farmers. With the improved package of practices fetched a higher B:C ratio of 2.25 while farmers practice gave 2.16. The yield range in improved practice was 4.85 q/ha-10.44 q/ha while under farmers practice it ranged from 4.05 q/ha to 8.28 q/ha. In improved package of practices, input supplied to farmers were improved seed, seed treatment chemicals and bio fertilizers particularly phosphate solubilizing bacteria. During crop period and after harvest the crop period the reaction of farmers about critical input supplied under demonstration was asked and they replied good seed germination and early maturity of the variety than local seeds. While the farmers suggested shattering tolerance varieties should be developed and major constrains was the unavailability of newly released seeds on time.

Keywords


Gap Analysis, Economics of Isabgil, Frontline Demonstrations.

References