Current Science

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Classic Articles Published by American Scientists (1900-2014): A Bibliometric Analysis


Affiliations
1 Trend Research Centre, Asia University, No. 500, Lioufeng Road, Wufeng, Taichung County, 41354, Taiwan, Province of China
2 School of Psychology, Keele University, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, England, United Kingdom
 

The present study explores US independent classic articles published by American scientists from 1900 to 2014. We examined those articles that had been cited at least 1000 times since publication to the end of 2014 using the Science Citation Index Expanded in the Web of Science (WoS). We also applied a bibliometric indicator, the Y-index, to assess the contributions of the authors of these articles. The results showed that 4909 classic articles were published between 1916 and 2013, and that the most productive categories from the WoS were multidisciplinary sciences, biochemistry and molecular biology, and general and internal medicine. Science published most of these articles, and the three most productive institutions were Harvard University, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and Stanford University. The physicist, Edward Witten was the most prolific author and an article written by the biochemist, Marion Bradford at University of Georgia in 1976 had the highest number of citations. In addition, the article by Perdew, Burke and Ernzerhof at Tulane University had the highest number of citations in 2014.

Keywords

Classic Articles, Publication Characteristics, Scientometrics, Y-Index.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Monge-Nájera, J. and Ho, Y. S., Bibliometry of Panama publications in the Science Citation Index Expanded: publication type, language, fields, authors and institutions. Rev. Biol. Trop., 2015, 63(4), 1255–1266.

  • Ivanović, D., Fu, H. Z. and Ho, Y. S., Publications from Serbia in the Science Citation Index Expanded: a bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics, 2015, 105(1), 145–160.

  • Fiala, D. and Ho, Y. S., Twenty years of Czech science: a bibliometric analysis. Malaysian J. Lib. Inf. Sci., 2015, 20(2), 85–102.

  • Fu, H. Z. and Ho, Y. S., Independent research of China in Science Citation Index Expanded during 1980–2011. J. Informetr., 2013, 7(1), 210–222.

  • Ivanović, D. and Ho, Y. S., Independent publications from Serbia in the Science Citation Index Expanded: a bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics, 2014, 101(1), 603–622.

  • Chuang, K. Y. and Ho, Y. S., An evaluation based on highly cited publications in Taiwan. Curr. Sci., 2015, 108(5), 933–941.

  • Fu, H. Z. and Ho, Y. S., Highly cited Canada articles in Science Citation Index Expanded: a bibliometric analysis. Can. Soc. Sci., 2015, 11(3), 50–62.

  • Wang, M. H., Li, J. F. and Ho, Y. S., Research articles published in water resources journals: a bibliometric analysis. Desalination Water Treatment, 2011, 28(1–3), 353–365.

  • Chuang, K. Y., Wang, M. H. and Ho, Y. S., High-impact papers presented in the subject category of water resources in the Essential Science Indicators database of the Institute for Scientific Information. Scientometrics, 2011, 87(3), 551–562.

  • Aad, G. et al., Combined measurement of the Higgs boson mass in pp collisions at s1/2 = 7 and 8 TeV with the ATLAS and CMS Experiments. Phys. Rev. Lett., 2015, 114(19), Article Number: 191803.

  • Aad, G. et al., Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC. Phys. Lett. B, 2012, 716(1), 1–29.

  • Ho, Y. S., The top-cited research works in the Science Citation Index Expanded. Scientometrics, 2013, 94(3), 1297–1312.

  • Ho, Y. S. and Kahn, M., A bibliometric study of highly cited reviews in the Science Citation Index Expanded™. J. Assoc. Infor. Sci. Technol., 2014, 65(2), 372–385.

  • Long, X., Huang, J. Z. and Ho, Y. S., A historical review of classic articles in surgery field. Am. J. Surg., 2014, 208(5), 841–849.

  • Ho, Y. S. and Hartley, J., Classic articles in psychology in the Science Citation Index Expanded: a bibliometric analysis. Br. J. Psychol., 2016, doi:10.1111/bjop.12163

  • Egghe, L., Theory and practise of the g-index. Scientometrics, 2006, 69(1), 131–152.

  • Hirsch, J. E., An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2005, 102(46), 16569–16572.

  • Jin, B. H., Liang, L. M., Rousseau, R. and Egghe, L., The R- and AR-indices: complementing the h-index. Chin. Sci. Bull., 2007, 52(6), 855–863.

  • Ho, Y. S., Top-cited articles in chemical engineering in Science Citation Index Expanded: a bibliometric analysis. Chin. J. Chem. Eng., 2012, 20(3), 478–488.

  • Ho, Y. S., Classic articles on social work field in Social Science Citation Index: a bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics, 2014, 98(1), 137–155.

  • Li, Z. and Ho, Y. S., Use of citation per publication as an indicator to evaluate contingent valuation research. Scientometrics, 2008, 75(1), 97–110.

  • Chuang, K. Y. and Ho, Y. S., Bibliometric profile of top-cited single-author articles in the Science Citation Index Expanded. J. Informetr., 2014, 8(4), 951–962.

  • Mattsson, P., Sundberg, C. J. and Laget, P., Is correspondence reflected in the author position? A bibliometric study of the relation between corresponding author and byline position. Scientometrics, 2011, 87(1) 99–105.

  • Göppert-Mayer, M., Über Elementarakte mit zwei Quantensprüngen. Ann. Phys. -Berlin, 1931, 401(3), 273–294.

  • Langmuir, I., The adsorption of gases on plane surfaces of glass, mica and platinum. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1918, 40(9), 1361–1403.

  • Fu, H. Z., Wang, M. H. and Ho, Y. S., The most frequently cited adsorption research articles in the Science Citation Index (Expanded). J. Colloid Interface Sci., 2012, 379(1), 148–156.

  • Wollan, E. O. and Koehler, W. C., Neutron diffraction study of the magnetic properties of the series of perovskite-type compounds [(1 – x)La, xCa]MnO3. Phys. Rev., 1955, 100(2), 545–563.

  • Fiske, C. H. and Subbarow, Y., The colorimetric determination of phosphorus. J. Biol. Chem., 1925, 66(2), 375–400.

  • Siegel, R., Naishadham, D. and Jemal, A., Cancer statistics, 2012; CA – Cancer J. Clin., 2012, 62(1), 10–29.

  • Chuang, K. Y., Chuang, Y. C. and Ho, Y. S., Global influence of cancer statistics articles. Curr. Sci., 2015, 109(9), 1552–1554.

  • Baltussen, A. and Kindler, C. H., Citation classics in anesthetic journals. Anesth. Analg., 2004, 98(2), 443–451.

  • Onsager, L., Electric moments of molecules in liquids. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1936, 58(8), 1486–1493.

  • Witten, E., Dynamical breaking of supersymmetry. Nucl. Phys. B, 1981, 188(3), 513–554.

  • Engers, M., Gans, J. S., Grant, S. and King, S. P., First-author conditions. J. Polit. Econ., 1999, 107(4), 859–883.

  • Zuckerman, H. A., Patterns of name ordering among authors of scientific papers: a study of social symbolism and its ambiguity. Am. J. Soc., 1968, 74(3), 276–291.

  • Costas, R. and Bordons, M., Do age and professional rank influence the order of authorship in scientific publications? Some evidence from a micro-level perspective. Scientometrics, 2011, 88(1), 145–161.

  • Slone, R. M., Coauthors’ contributions to major papers published in the AJR: frequency of undeserved coauthorship. Am. J. Roentgenol., 1996, 167(3), 571–579.

  • Dotson, B. and Slaughter, R. L., Prevalence of articles with honorary and ghost authors in three pharmacy journals. Am. J. HealthSyst. Pharm., 2011, 68(18), 1730–1734.

  • Bennett, D. M. and Taylor, D. M., Unethical practices in authorship of scientific papers. Emerg. Med., 2003, 15(3), 263–270.

  • Singh, S., Criteria for authorship. Indian J. Dermatol. Venereol. Leprol., 2009, 75(2), 211–213.

  • Anon., The role and responsibilities of coauthors. Lancet, 2008, 372(9641), 778.

  • Burman, K. D., ‘Hanging from the masthead’: reflections on authorship. Ann. Intern. Med., 1982, 97(4), 602–605.

  • Bhandari, M. et al., Perceptions of authors’ contributions are influenced by both byline order and designation of corresponding author. J. Clin. Epidemiol., 2014, 67(9), 1049–1054.

  • Schwartz, F. W., Fang, Y. C. and Parthasarathy, S., Patterns of evolution of research strands in the hydrologic sciences. Hydrogeol. J., 2005, 13(1), 25–36.

  • Perdew, J. P., Burke, K. and Ernzerhof, M., Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett., 1996, 77(18), 3865– 3868.

  • Bradford, M. M., Rapid and sensitive method for quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing principle of protein-dye binding. Anal. Biochem., 1976, 72(1–2), 248–254.

  • Livak, K. J. and Schmittgen, T. D., Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2-ΔΔCT method. Methods, 2001, 25(4), 402–408.

  • Lee, C. T., Yang, W. T. and Parr, R. G., Development of the Colle–Salvetti correlation–energy formula into a functional of the electron density. Phys. Rev. B, 1988, 37(2), 785–789.

  • Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E. and Mchugh, P. R., Mini-mental state: practical method for grading cognitive state of patients for clinician. J. Psychiatr. Res., 1975, 12(3), 189–198.

  • Siegel, R., Naishadham, D. and Jemal, A., Cancer statistics, 2013; CA – Cancer J. Clin., 2013, 63(1), 11–30.

  • Monkhorst, H. J. and Pack, J. D., Special points for Brillouin-zone integrations. Phys. Rev. B, 1976, 13(12), 5188–5192.

  • Altschul, S. F., Madden, T. L., Schäffer, A. A., Zhang, J. H., Zhang, Z., Miller, W. and Lipman, D. J., Gapped BLAST and PSIPSIBLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucl. Acids Res., 1997, 25(17), 3389–3402.

  • Hu, L. T. and Bentler, P. M., Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct. Equ. Model., 1999, 6(1), 1–55.

  • Shannon, R. D., Revised effective ionic radii and systematic studies of interatomie distances in halides and chaleogenides. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. A, 1976, 32, 751–767.

  • DerSimonian, R. and Laird, N., Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Controll. Clin. Trials, 1986, 7(3), 177–188.

  • Saitou, N. and Nei, M., The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol., 1987, 4(4), 406–425.

  • Landis, J. R. and Koch, G. G., The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 1977, 33(1), 159–174.

  • Avramescu, A., Actuality and obsolescence of scientific literature. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci., 1979, 30(5), 296–303.

  • Lefaivre, K. A., Shadgan, B. and O’Brien, P. J., 100 most cited articles in orthopaedic surgery. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res., 2011, 469(5), 1487–1497.

  • Li, J., Citation curves of ‘all-elements-sleeping-beauties’: ‘flash in the pan’ first and then ‘delayed recognition’. Scientometrics, 2014, 100(2), 595–601.

  • Wu, M. K. et al., Superconductivity at 93 K in a new mixed-phase Y–Ba–Cu–O compound system at ambient pressure. Phys. Rev. Lett., 1987, 58(9), 908–910.

  • Garfield, E., Highly cited authors. Scientist, 2002, 16(7), 10.

  • Chomczynski, P. and Sacchi, N., Single-step method of RNA isolation by acid guanidinium thiocyanate–phenol–chloroform extraction. Anal. Biochem., 1987, 162(1), 156–159.

  • Hsu, Y. H. E. and Ho, Y. S., Highly cited articles in health care sciences and services field in Science Citation Index Expanded: a bibliometric analysis for 1958–2012. Meth. Inf. Med., 2014, 53(6), 446–458.


Abstract Views: 415

PDF Views: 132




  • Classic Articles Published by American Scientists (1900-2014): A Bibliometric Analysis

Abstract Views: 415  |  PDF Views: 132

Authors

Yuh-Shan Ho
Trend Research Centre, Asia University, No. 500, Lioufeng Road, Wufeng, Taichung County, 41354, Taiwan, Province of China
James Hartley
School of Psychology, Keele University, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, England, United Kingdom

Abstract


The present study explores US independent classic articles published by American scientists from 1900 to 2014. We examined those articles that had been cited at least 1000 times since publication to the end of 2014 using the Science Citation Index Expanded in the Web of Science (WoS). We also applied a bibliometric indicator, the Y-index, to assess the contributions of the authors of these articles. The results showed that 4909 classic articles were published between 1916 and 2013, and that the most productive categories from the WoS were multidisciplinary sciences, biochemistry and molecular biology, and general and internal medicine. Science published most of these articles, and the three most productive institutions were Harvard University, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and Stanford University. The physicist, Edward Witten was the most prolific author and an article written by the biochemist, Marion Bradford at University of Georgia in 1976 had the highest number of citations. In addition, the article by Perdew, Burke and Ernzerhof at Tulane University had the highest number of citations in 2014.

Keywords


Classic Articles, Publication Characteristics, Scientometrics, Y-Index.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv111%2Fi7%2F1156-1165