Current Science

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Assessment of GMean Biological Soil Quality Indices under Conservation Agriculture Practices in Rainfed Alfisol Soils


Affiliations
1 Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Saidabad PO, Santoshnagar, Hyderabad 500 059, India
 

The present study was conducted in 2009-10 with the objective to monitor the effect of restorative soil management practices on biological soil quality. The experiment was initiated in 1995 in a strip-split-split plot design with three replications. Sorghum and castor were grown in two-year rotations. The procedure comprised of two tillage treatments: conventional tillage (CT) and minimum tillage (MT; main plots), three residues treatments: sorghum stover (SS), Gliricidia loppings (GL), no residue (NR; sub-plots), and two nitrogen levels 0 (N0) and 90 kg ha-1 (N90) (sub-subplots). After 15th year of the experiment, activities of the soil enzymes, microbial biomass carbon (MBC), labile carbon (LC) and organic carbon (OC) were studied. Soil management treatments significantly influenced the soil enzyme activities. Enzyme activity was significantly correlated with MBC, LC and OC. The biological soil quality has been assessed in terms of GMeanBSQI (geometric mean of biological soil quality index). From the viewpoint of GMeanBSQI, the order of superiority of soil management treatments was: MT (0.82) > CT (0.69). The performance of the residues was in the order GL (0.87) > SS (0.75) > NR (0.65). Nitrogen @ 90 kg ha-1 (0.81) proved superior to no nitrogen (N0 - 0.70). Among all the treatment combinations, MTGLN90 was found to be the most superior management option for ensuring higher GMean in rainfed Alfisol soils. The present study indicates that crop residue management under minimum tillage is of great significance in improving the biological soil quality indicators and indices. The results obtained are significant in improving biological soil quality index and crop productivity through appropriate soil management.

Keywords

Biological Soil Quality, Crop Yield, Labile Carbon Pools, Soil Enzyme Activity, Soil Management.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Doran, J. W. and Parkin, T. B., Quantitative indicators of soil quality: a minimum dataset. In Methods for Assessing Soil Quality (eds Doran, J. W. and Jones, A. J.), Soil Science Society of America, Special Publication, 1996, vol. 49, pp. 25–37.

  • Elliott, E. and Coleman, D., Let the soil work for US. Ecol. Bull., 1988, 39, 23–32.

  • Belay-Tedla, A., Zhou, X., Su, B., Wan, S. and Luo, Y., Labile, recalcitrant and microbial carbon and nitrogen pools of a tall grass prairie soil in the US Great Plains subjected to experimental warming and clipping. Soil Biol. Biochem., 2009, 41, 110–116.

  • Tabatabai, M. A. and Bremner, J. M., Use of p-nitrophenyl phosphate for assay of soil phosphatase activity. Soil Biol. Biochem., 1969, 1, 301–307.

  • Eivazi, F. and Tabatabai, M. A., Phosphatase in soils. Soil Biol. Biochem., 1977, 9, 167–172.

  • Tabatabai, M. A. and Bremner, J. M., Arylsulfatase activity of soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc., 1970, 34, 225–229.

  • Tabatabai, M. A. and Bremner, J. M., Assay of urease activity in soils. Soil Biol. Biochem., 1972, 3, 317–323.

  • Jenkinson, D. S. and Powlson, D. S., The effects of biocidal treatment on metabolism in soil – V. A method for measuring soil biomass. Soil Biol Biochem., 1976, 8, 209–213.

  • Jenkinson, D. S. and Ladd, J. N., Microbial biomass in soil: measurement and turnover. In Soil Biochemistry (eds Paul, E. A. and Ladd, J. N.), Marcel Dekker, NY, 1981, pp. 415–471.

  • Lenhard, G., The dehydrogenase activity in soil as a measure of the activity of soil microorganisms. Z. Pflanzenernaehr. Dueng. Bodenkd., 1956, 73, 1–11.

  • Weil, R. R., Estimating active carbon for soil quality assessment. A simplified method for laboratory and field use. Am. J. Alternat. Agric., 2003, 18, 3–17.

  • Walkley, A. J. and Black, C. A., An examination of the effect of the digestive method for determining soil organic matter and the proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci., 1934, 37, 29–38.

  • Snedecor, G., Cochran, W. and Cox, D., Statistical Methods, The Iowa State University Press, Ames, IA, USA, 1989, 8th edn.

  • Liebig, M. A., Varvel, G. and Doran, J., A simple performancebased index for assessing multiple agroecosystem functions. Agron. J., 2001, 93(2), 313–318.

  • Paz-Ferreiro, J., Gascó, G., Gutierrez, B. and Mendez, A., Soil biochemical activities and the geometric mean of enzyme activities after application of sewage sludge and sewage sludge biochar to soil. Biol. Fertil. Soils, 2012, 48, 511–517.

  • Martens, D. A., Johanson, J. B. and Frankenberger Jr, W. T., Production and persistence of soil enzymes with repeated additions of organic residues. Soil Sci., 1992, 153, 53–61.

  • Monreal, C. M. and Bergstrom, D. W., Soil enzymatic factors expressing the influence of land use, tillage system and texture on soil biochemical quality. Can. J. Soil. Sci., 2000, 80, 419–428.

  • Allison, S. D., Soil minerals and humic acids alter enzyme stability: implications for ecosystem process. Biogeochemistry, 2006, 81, 361–373.

  • Han, K. H., Choi, W. J., Han, G. H., Yun, S. I., Yoo, S. H. and Ro, H. M., Urea nitrogen transformation and compost nitrogen mineralization in three different soils as affected by the interaction between both nitrogen inputs. Biol. Fertil. Soils, 2004, 39, 193–199.

  • Mohammadi, K., Eskandari, M., Heidari, G. and Nezhad, M. T. K., Canola traits and some soil biological parameters in response to fertilization and tillage management. Afr. J. Biotechnol., 2011, 10(64), 14067–14072.

  • Sharma, K. L., Mandal, U. K., Srinivas, K., Vittal, K. P. R., Mandal, B., Kusuma Grace, J. and Ramesh, V., Long-term soil management effects on crop yields and soil quality in a dryland Alfisol. Soil Till. Res., 2005, 83, 246–259.


Abstract Views: 301

PDF Views: 130




  • Assessment of GMean Biological Soil Quality Indices under Conservation Agriculture Practices in Rainfed Alfisol Soils

Abstract Views: 301  |  PDF Views: 130

Authors

K. L. Sharma
Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Saidabad PO, Santoshnagar, Hyderabad 500 059, India
Ch. Srinivasa Rao
Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Saidabad PO, Santoshnagar, Hyderabad 500 059, India
D. Suma Chandrika
Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Saidabad PO, Santoshnagar, Hyderabad 500 059, India
N. Nandini
Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Saidabad PO, Santoshnagar, Hyderabad 500 059, India
Munnalal
Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Saidabad PO, Santoshnagar, Hyderabad 500 059, India
K. Sammi Reddy
Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Saidabad PO, Santoshnagar, Hyderabad 500 059, India
A. K. Indoria
Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Saidabad PO, Santoshnagar, Hyderabad 500 059, India
T. Satish Kumar
Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Saidabad PO, Santoshnagar, Hyderabad 500 059, India

Abstract


The present study was conducted in 2009-10 with the objective to monitor the effect of restorative soil management practices on biological soil quality. The experiment was initiated in 1995 in a strip-split-split plot design with three replications. Sorghum and castor were grown in two-year rotations. The procedure comprised of two tillage treatments: conventional tillage (CT) and minimum tillage (MT; main plots), three residues treatments: sorghum stover (SS), Gliricidia loppings (GL), no residue (NR; sub-plots), and two nitrogen levels 0 (N0) and 90 kg ha-1 (N90) (sub-subplots). After 15th year of the experiment, activities of the soil enzymes, microbial biomass carbon (MBC), labile carbon (LC) and organic carbon (OC) were studied. Soil management treatments significantly influenced the soil enzyme activities. Enzyme activity was significantly correlated with MBC, LC and OC. The biological soil quality has been assessed in terms of GMeanBSQI (geometric mean of biological soil quality index). From the viewpoint of GMeanBSQI, the order of superiority of soil management treatments was: MT (0.82) > CT (0.69). The performance of the residues was in the order GL (0.87) > SS (0.75) > NR (0.65). Nitrogen @ 90 kg ha-1 (0.81) proved superior to no nitrogen (N0 - 0.70). Among all the treatment combinations, MTGLN90 was found to be the most superior management option for ensuring higher GMean in rainfed Alfisol soils. The present study indicates that crop residue management under minimum tillage is of great significance in improving the biological soil quality indicators and indices. The results obtained are significant in improving biological soil quality index and crop productivity through appropriate soil management.

Keywords


Biological Soil Quality, Crop Yield, Labile Carbon Pools, Soil Enzyme Activity, Soil Management.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv111%2Fi8%2F1383-1387