Current Science

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Are Small-Sized Firms Really Innovative? Understanding the Indian Scenario


Affiliations
1 Academy of Scientific and Innovative Research, CSIR-National Institute of Science, Technology and Development Studies, Dr K.S. Krishnan Marg, New Delhi 110 012, India
 

This article presents an understanding of innovation in the Indian context by considering the relationship between firm size and innovation. This is based on a major study on innovation where survey of Indian firms was undertaken by the research team to understand the process in the Indian context. In this article the focus is on the relationship between firm size and propensity to innovate. The interesting observation is that the small-sized firms focus mostly on minor or marginal innovations which are either not recognized or go unnoticed in the market. The purpose behind such initiatives is to enable them to sustain in the market. This brings in an interesting dimension of the process of innovation where the firms innovate not to create market, but to sustain themselves in the market. The article presents variation in the innovation activities amongst the firms depending upon their size.

Keywords

Firm Size, Innovation Propensity, Innovation, Novelty or Newness.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Arora, P. and Nath, P., Innovation in Indian industries: insights from the First National Innovation Survey. Asian J. Innov. Policy, 2015, 4(3), 360–380.

  • Gupta, A. K., Tapping the entrepreneurial potential of grassischolar_mains innovation. In Stanford Social Innovation Review, Special Supplement on Innovation for a Complex World, Summer, 2013, pp. 18–20.

  • Bound, K. and Thornton, I., Our frugal future: lessons from India’s Innovation System. Report, Nesta, UK, 2012, p. 10.

  • Fressoli, M. et al., When grassischolar_mains innovation movements encounter mainstream institutions: implications for models of inclusive innovation. Innov. Develop., 2014, 4(2), 277–292.

  • Lall, S., Determinants of R&D in an LDC: the Indian engineering industry. Econ. Lett., 1983, 13(4), 379–383.

  • Desai, A., The origin and direction of industrial R&D in India. Res. Policy, 1980, 9(1), 74–96.

  • Kumar, N. and Saqib, M., Firm size, opportunity for adaptation, and in-house R&D activity in developing countries: the case of Indian manufacturing. UNU/INTECH Working Paper No. 13, 1994.

  • Sinha, A. P., Innovation in Indian firms: myths and reality. Econ. Polit. Wkly., 1983, 18(35), M111–M115.

  • Lundvall, B.-Å. (ed.), National Innovation Systems: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning, Pinter Publishers, London, 1992.

  • Eitlie, J. E. and Rubenstein, H., Firm size and product innovation. J. Prod. Innov. Manage., 1987, 4(2), 89–108.

  • Wakasugi, R. and Koyata, F., R&D, firm size and innovation outputs: are Japanese firms efficient in product development? J. Prod. Innov. Manage, 1997, 14, 383–392.

  • Camison-Zornoza, C. et al., A meta-analysis of innovation and organisational size. Organ. Stud., 2004, 25(3), 331–361.

  • Kamien, M. I. and Schwartz. N. L., Market Structure and Innovation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1982.

  • Arrow, K., Economic welfare and the allocation of resources of invention. In The Rate and Direction of Incentive Activity: Economic and Social Factors (ed. Universities-National Bureau), National Bureau of Economic Research, 1962, pp. 609–626.

  • Philips, A., Market structure innovation and investment. In Patents and Progress: The Sources and Impact of Advancing Technology (eds Alderson, W. et al.), pp. 37–58.

  • Nath, P., Firm size and in-house R&D: the Indian experience revisited. Dev. Econ., 1993, 31(3), 329–344.

  • Oslo Manual, Proposed Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Technological Innovation Data, Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, OCDE/GD(92)26, Paris, 1992.

  • Understanding Innovation: India’s National Innovation Survey (with special focus to MSME), National Science and Technology Management Information System, Department of Science and Technology, Government of India, 2014.

  • Jaramillo, H., Lugones, G. and Salazar, M., Bogota Manual, Standardisation of Indicators of Technological Innovation in Latin American and Caribbean Countries, Iberoamerican Network of Science and Technology Indicators (RICYT) Organisation of American States (OAS)/CYTED PROGRAM, Nesta, UK, 2001; http://www.ricyt.org/manuales/doc-view/149-bogota-manual

  • National Innovation Survey, NSTMIS, DST, Government of India; http://nationalinnovationsurvey.nstmis-dst.org/

  • Nelson, R. and Rosenberg, N., Technical innovation and national systems. In National Innovation Systems (ed. Nelson, R.), Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1993.


Abstract Views: 428

PDF Views: 132




  • Are Small-Sized Firms Really Innovative? Understanding the Indian Scenario

Abstract Views: 428  |  PDF Views: 132

Authors

Debanjana Dey
Academy of Scientific and Innovative Research, CSIR-National Institute of Science, Technology and Development Studies, Dr K.S. Krishnan Marg, New Delhi 110 012, India

Abstract


This article presents an understanding of innovation in the Indian context by considering the relationship between firm size and innovation. This is based on a major study on innovation where survey of Indian firms was undertaken by the research team to understand the process in the Indian context. In this article the focus is on the relationship between firm size and propensity to innovate. The interesting observation is that the small-sized firms focus mostly on minor or marginal innovations which are either not recognized or go unnoticed in the market. The purpose behind such initiatives is to enable them to sustain in the market. This brings in an interesting dimension of the process of innovation where the firms innovate not to create market, but to sustain themselves in the market. The article presents variation in the innovation activities amongst the firms depending upon their size.

Keywords


Firm Size, Innovation Propensity, Innovation, Novelty or Newness.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv112%2Fi06%2F1121-1126