Current Science

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Balancing Conservation and Development in Nandhaur Wildlife Sanctuary, Uttarakhand, India


Affiliations
1 Wildlife Institute of India, Post Box # 18, Chandrabani, Dehra Dun 248 001, India
 

The Terai Arc Landscape in the foothills of the Himalaya is a critical tiger conservation unit straddling India and Nepal. The Nandhaur Wildlife Sanctuary (NWS) located in the eastern part of this landscape, is an important corridor for the movement of large mammalian species. This landscape is under tremendous pressure due to increased human population and demands for forest resources. The present study (1) assesses the dependence of the local communities on forest resources, (2) identifies concerns and interests of major stakeholders, and (3) assesses the major issues challenging conservation in the NWS. Household surveys and focus group discussions were carried out in 13 fringe villages around the NWS, and key stakeholders were identified and consulted. Risk assessment was done to identify the major issues in the area and their underlying causes. The local communities are dependent on forest for fuel wood (25-40 kg/ household/day) and fodder (20-25 kg/household/day). Low-income groups, displaced groups and the gujjar community emerged as the most dependent stakeholders. Diverse interests arose from the communities having different livelihood patterns. Habitat loss and degradation due to excessive extraction of forest resources, riverbed mining and lack of support of local communities emerged as the major threats hampering conservation in the area. Involvement of local communities in forest conservation along with provision of alternative livelihood is needed. It is critical to develop a consultative framework with the local communities and other stakeholders to explore alternative strategies that meet conservation and development goals.

Keywords

Anthropogenic Pressure, Community-Based Conservation, Dependent Stakeholders, Forest Corridor, Habitat Degradation.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Williams, J. C., Delineating protected wildlife corridors with multi‐objective programming. Environ. Modell. Assess., 1998, 3(1–2), 77–86.

  • Rastogi, A., Hickey, G. M., Badola, R. and Hussain, S. A., Saving the superstar: a review of the social factors affecting tiger conservation in India. J. Environ. Manage., 2012, 113, 328–340.

  • WWF, The Terai Arc Landscape: Bengal Tigers in the Himalayas’ Shadow. World Wide fund for Nature, India, 2004.

  • Harihar, A., Veríssimo, D. and MacMillan, D. C., Beyond compensation: integrating local communities’ livelihood choices in large carnivore conservation. Global Environ. Change, 2015, 33, 122–130.

  • Dinerstein, E. et al., Setting Priorities for the Conservation and Recovery of Wild Tigers: 2005–2015. A User’s Guide, WWF, WCS, Smithsonian, and NFWF-STF, Washington, DC, New York, 2006.

  • Qureshi, Q., Saini, S., Basu, P., Raza, R. and Jhala, Y., Connecting tiger populations for long-term conservation. National Tiger Conservation Authority, Government of India, New Delhi, and Wildlife Institute of India, Dehradun, Technical Report, 2014–02.

  • Johnsingh, A. J. T. et al., Conservation status of tiger and associated species in the Terai Arc Landscape, India. Final Report submitted to Wildlife Institute of India, Dehradun, 2004, RR-04/001.

  • Chanchani, P. et al., Tigers of the transboundary Terai Arc Landscape: status, distribution and movement in the Terai of India and Nepal. National Tiger Conservation Authority, Government of India, and Department of National Park and Wildlife Conservation, Government of Nepal, NTNC/DNPWC, 3, 2014.

  • Verma, A., Proposal for Nandhaur Wildlife Sanctuary. Uttarakhand Forest Department, 2011.

  • Badola, R. and Hussain, S. A., Conflict in paradise: women and protected areas in the Indian Himalayas. Mt. Res. Dev., 2003, 23(3), 234–237.

  • Mamo, G., Sjaastad, E. and Vedeld, P., Economic dependence on forest resources: a case from Dendi District, Ethiopia. For. Policy Econ., 2007, 9(8), 916–927.

  • Reisman, C. K., Narrative analysis. Qual. Res. Methods Ser., 1993, 30.

  • McCance, T. V., McKenna, H. P. and Boore, J. R., Exploring caring using narrative methodology: an analysis of the approach. J. Adv. Nurs., 2001, 33(3), 350–356.

  • Badola, R., Attitudes of local people towards conservation and alternatives to forest resources: a case study from the lower Himalayas. Biodivers. Conserv., 1998, 7(10), 1245–1259.

  • Badola, R. and Silori, C., Nanda Devi Biosphere Reserve: a study on socio-economic aspects for the sustainable development of dependent population. Study Report, Wildlife Institute of India, Dehra Dun, India, 1999.

  • Mitroff, I. I. and Mason, R. O., The metaphysics of policy and planning: a reply to Cosier. Acad. Manage. Rev., 1981, 6(4), 649–651.

  • Goodman, L. A., Snowball sampling. Ann. Math. Stat., 1961, 32(1), 148–170.

  • Rastogi, A., Badola, R., Hussain, S. A. and Hickey, G. M., Assessing the utility of stakeholder analysis to protected areas management: the case of Corbett National Park, India. Biol. Conserv., 2010, 143(12), 2956–2964.

  • Nastran, M., Stakeholder analysis in a protected natural park: case study from Slovenia. J. Environ. Plann. Manage., 2014, 57(9), 1359–1380.

  • Schmeer, K., Guidelines for Conducting a Stakeholder Analysis. Bethesda, MD, Partnerships for Health Reform, Abt Associates Inc., November 1999.

  • Sartorius, R. H., The logical framework approach to project design and management. Eval. Pract., 1991, 12(2), 139–147.

  • Suter, W., Ecological Risk Assessment, CRC Press, Florida, United States, 2006, 2nd edn, p. 680.

  • Kellett, B. M., Walshe, T. V. and Bristow, K. L., Ecological risk assessment for the wetlands of the lower Burdekin. CSIRO Land and Water, 2005.

  • Sanchez, H., Robert, B., Bourgault, M. and Pellerin, R., Risk management applied to projects, programs, and portfolios. Int. J. Manag. Projects Bus., 2009, 2(1), 14–35.

  • Badola, R., Hussain, S. A., Mishra, B. K., Konthoujam, B., Thapliyal, S. and Dhakate, P. M., An assessment of ecosystem services of Corbett Tiger Reserve, India. Environmentalist, 2010, 30(4), 320–329.

  • World Parks Congress, Recommendation 29: Poverty and Protected Areas (web document), 2003.

  • Ogra, M. V. and Badola, R., Compensating human – wildlife conflict in protected area communities: ground-level perspectives from Uttarakhand, India. Hum. Ecol., 2008; 10.1007/s10745-008-9189-y.

  • Karanth, K. K. and DeFries, R., Nature-based tourism in Indian protected areas: new challenges for park management. Conserv. Lett., 2011, 4, 137e149.

  • Rastogi, A., Badola, R., Hussain, S. A. and Hickey, G. M., Stakeholder Analysis of Corbett National Park. In XIII World Forestry Congress, Buenos Aires, Argentina, 2009.

  • Wells, M., Brandon, K. and Hannah, L., People and parks: linking protected area management with local communities, World Bank, World Wildlife Fund and US Agency for International Development, Washington DC, 1992.

  • Wells, M. P. and Brandon, K. E., The principles and practice of buffer zones and local participation in biodiversity conservation. Ambio, 1993, 22(2/3), 157–162.

  • Chhatre, A. and Saberwal, V., Political incentives for biodiversity conservation. Conserv. Biol., 2005, 19, 310e317.

  • Mukul, S. A., Rashid, A. M., Quazi, S. A., Uddin, M. B. and Fox, J., Local peoples’ responses to co-management regime in protected areas: a case study from Satchari National Park, Bangladesh. For. Trees Livelihoods, 2012, 21(1), 16–29.

  • Larson, A. M. and Ribot, J. C, The poverty of forestry policy: double standards on an uneven playing field. Policy sciences for sustainable development, Sustain. Sci., 2007, 2, 189–204.

  • Karanth, K. U., Gopalaswamy, A. M., Kumar, N. S., Vaidyanathan, S., Nichols, J. D. and MacKenzie, D. I., Monitoring carnivore populations at the landscape scale: occupancy modelling of tigers from sign surveys. J. Appl. Ecol., 2011, 48(4), 1048–1056.


Abstract Views: 557

PDF Views: 137




  • Balancing Conservation and Development in Nandhaur Wildlife Sanctuary, Uttarakhand, India

Abstract Views: 557  |  PDF Views: 137

Authors

Michelle Irengbam
Wildlife Institute of India, Post Box # 18, Chandrabani, Dehra Dun 248 001, India
Pariva Dobriyal
Wildlife Institute of India, Post Box # 18, Chandrabani, Dehra Dun 248 001, India
Syed Ainul Hussain
Wildlife Institute of India, Post Box # 18, Chandrabani, Dehra Dun 248 001, India
Ruchi Badola
Wildlife Institute of India, Post Box # 18, Chandrabani, Dehra Dun 248 001, India

Abstract


The Terai Arc Landscape in the foothills of the Himalaya is a critical tiger conservation unit straddling India and Nepal. The Nandhaur Wildlife Sanctuary (NWS) located in the eastern part of this landscape, is an important corridor for the movement of large mammalian species. This landscape is under tremendous pressure due to increased human population and demands for forest resources. The present study (1) assesses the dependence of the local communities on forest resources, (2) identifies concerns and interests of major stakeholders, and (3) assesses the major issues challenging conservation in the NWS. Household surveys and focus group discussions were carried out in 13 fringe villages around the NWS, and key stakeholders were identified and consulted. Risk assessment was done to identify the major issues in the area and their underlying causes. The local communities are dependent on forest for fuel wood (25-40 kg/ household/day) and fodder (20-25 kg/household/day). Low-income groups, displaced groups and the gujjar community emerged as the most dependent stakeholders. Diverse interests arose from the communities having different livelihood patterns. Habitat loss and degradation due to excessive extraction of forest resources, riverbed mining and lack of support of local communities emerged as the major threats hampering conservation in the area. Involvement of local communities in forest conservation along with provision of alternative livelihood is needed. It is critical to develop a consultative framework with the local communities and other stakeholders to explore alternative strategies that meet conservation and development goals.

Keywords


Anthropogenic Pressure, Community-Based Conservation, Dependent Stakeholders, Forest Corridor, Habitat Degradation.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv112%2Fi06%2F1187-1196