Current Science

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Declaring the Commercial Source and Grade of Chemicals, and Equipment, in a Scientific Paper


Affiliations
1 P. O. Box 7, Miki-cho Post Office, Ikenobe 3011-2, Kagawa-ken, 761-0799, Japan
2 Research Institute of Nyíregyhaza, University of Debrecen, Nyiregyhaza, P.O. Box 12, H-4400, Hungary
 

Scientific biomedical papers widely use chemicals, reagents and/or equipment. These are described in the materials and methods section. The source of these methodological props needs to be precisely defined for scientific and proprietary reasons. The commercial source or grade of a chemical can affect the quality and outcome of an analysis, e.g. in plant tissue culture. Failure to recognize the commercial source deprives a company of its due proprietary investment in a product, reduces reproducibility and thus constitutes an incomplete or erroneous methodology. Such errors should be corrected, which should be the responsibility of authors, editors and publishers.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Teixeira da Silva, J. A. and Dobránszki, J., Accountability Res.: Policies Qual. Assurance, 2015, 22(1), 22–40.

  • Teixeira da Silva, J. A., The Winnower, 2016, 3, e146575.50444.

  • ASHS (American Society for Horticultural Science), 2015; http://c.ymcdn.com/ sites/www.ashs.org/resource/resmgr/files/ style_manual.pdf (accessed on 5 October 2016).

  • Penarrubia, L., Romero, P., CarrióSeguí, A., Andrés-Bordería, A., Moreno, J. and Sanz, A., Front. Plant Sci., 2015, 6, 255.

  • Shahbaz, M., Ravet, K., Peers, G. and Pilon, M., Front. Plant Sci., 2015, 6, 407.

  • Briat, J-F., Rouached, H., Tissot, N., Gaymard, F. and Dubos, C., Front. Plant Sci., 2015, 6, 290.

  • George, E. F. and de Klerk, G.-J., In Plant Propagation by Tissue Culture. Vol. 1. The Background (eds George, E.

  • F., Hall, M. A. and de Klerk, G-J.), Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2008, 3rd edn, pp. 65–113.

  • Anagnostakis, S. L. O., Planta, 1974, 15, 281–283.

  • Debergh, P. C., Physiol. Plant., 1983, 59, 270–276.

  • Orlikowska, T., Biol. Plant., 1992, 34, 45–52.

  • Thorpe, T., Stasolla, C., Yeung, E. C., de Klerk, G. J., Roberts, A. and George, E.F., In Plant Propagation by Tissue Culture (eds George, E. F., Hall, M. A. and de Klerk, G-J.), Springer, Dordrecht, 2008, 3rd edn, pp. 115–173.

  • Sulusoglu, M., Turk. J. Agric. Nat. Sci., 2014, 1, 957–963.

  • Scholten, H. J. and Pierik, R. L. M., Plant Cell Rep., 1998, 17, 230–235.

  • Scholten, H. J. and Pierik, R. L. M., Sci. Hortic., 1998, 77, 109–116.

  • Beruto, M., Curir, P. and Debergh, P., In Vitro Cell. Dev. – Plant., 1999, 35, 94– 101.

  • Pereira-Netto, A. B., Petkowitz, C. L. O., Cruz-Silva, C. T. A., Gazzoni, M. T., Mello, A. F. P. and Silveira, J. L. M., In Vitro Cell. Dev. – Plant., 2007, 43, 356– 363.

  • Ramesh, Y. and Ramassamy, V., Int. J.Curr. Res. Biosci. Plant Biol., 2015, 2, 174–178.

  • Kodym, A. and Zapata-Arias, F. J., Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult., 2001, 66, 67–71.

  • Placide, R., Rwanda J., 2012, 28, 76– 83.

  • Van der Salm, T. P. M., Van der Toorn, C. J. G., Tencate, C. H. H., Dubois, L. A. M., Devries, D. P. and Dons, H. J. M., Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult., 1994, 37, 73– 77.

  • Sotiropoulos, T. E., Almaliotis, D., Papadakis, I., Dimassi, K. N. and Therios, I.N., Eur. J. Hortic. Sci., 2006, 71, 222– 226.

  • Antonopoulou, C., Dimassi, K., Therios, I., Chatzissavvidis, C. and Papadakis, I., Acta Physiol. Plant., 2007, 29, 559–561.

  • Trejgell, A., Libront, I. and Tretyn, A., Acta Physiol. Plant., 2012, 34, 2051– 2055.

  • Garrison, W., Dale, A. and Saxena, P. K., Can. J. Plant Sci., 2013, 93, 511– 521.

  • Dapson, R. W., Biotech. Histochem., 2007, 82, 173–187.

  • Huang, C. and Chen, C., Biosyst. Eng., 2005, 91, 501–511.

  • McClelland, M. T. and Smith, M. A. L., HortScience, 1990, 25, 797–800.

  • Fal, M. A., Majada, J. P. and Tamés, R. S., In Vitro Cell. Dev. – Plant., 2002, 38, 589–594.

  • Yann, L. K., Nornadia, K., Jin, C. S., Izzati, N., Bhatt, A., Ping, N. S. and LaiKeng, C., J. Med. Plants Res., 2010, 4, 2273–2282.

  • Teixeira da Silva, J. A., Front. Plant Sci., 2013, 4, 485.

  • Teixeira da Silva, J. A., Sci. Editor (CSE), 2014, 37(2), 57–59.

  • Teixeira da Silva, J. A., J. Sci. Expl., 2015, 29(2), 353–356.

  • Teixeira da Silva, J. A., J. Educ. Soc. Res., 2015, 5(2), 15–21.

  • Teixeira da Silva, J. A., Int. J. Educ. Inf. Technol. (Public Science Framework), 2015, 1(2), 34–37.

  • COPE (Committee of Publication Ethics), Code of conduct for journal editors. 2016; http://publicationethics.org/files/ Code_of_conduct_for_journal_editors_ Mar11.pdf (accessed on 5 October 2016).

  • Teixeira da Silva, J. A., Asian Australasian J. Plant Sci. Biotechnol., 2013, 7, 6–15.


Abstract Views: 411

PDF Views: 129




  • Declaring the Commercial Source and Grade of Chemicals, and Equipment, in a Scientific Paper

Abstract Views: 411  |  PDF Views: 129

Authors

Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva
P. O. Box 7, Miki-cho Post Office, Ikenobe 3011-2, Kagawa-ken, 761-0799, Japan
Judit Dobranszki
Research Institute of Nyíregyhaza, University of Debrecen, Nyiregyhaza, P.O. Box 12, H-4400, Hungary

Abstract


Scientific biomedical papers widely use chemicals, reagents and/or equipment. These are described in the materials and methods section. The source of these methodological props needs to be precisely defined for scientific and proprietary reasons. The commercial source or grade of a chemical can affect the quality and outcome of an analysis, e.g. in plant tissue culture. Failure to recognize the commercial source deprives a company of its due proprietary investment in a product, reduces reproducibility and thus constitutes an incomplete or erroneous methodology. Such errors should be corrected, which should be the responsibility of authors, editors and publishers.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv112%2Fi08%2F1623-1626