Current Science

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Acknowledgements in Francis Crick’s Papers Appearing in Science Journals


Affiliations
1 Section of General Education, Gifu University, 1-1 Yanagido, Gifu City 501-1193, Japan
 

Apart from citation counting, the study of recorded acknowledgements by researchers as a recognizable metric to evaluate peer influence is currently gaining momentum. As a metric, acknowledgements have an advantage over citations. Whereas citations can be copied and pasted from one publication to the next by an unscrupulous researcher without being studied in depth, acknowledgements cannot be lifted in such a duplicitous style. Here I present an exploratory survey of acknowledgement patterns in journal papers by Francis Crick. Five principal categories (namely, moral, financial, editorial, instrumental/technical and conceptual) were studied from 104 papers authored by Crick, either solely or collaboratively, over a span of five decades. To the best of my knowledge, there are no earlier studies where acknowledgement patterns of a well-recognized interdisciplinary scientist are reported cumulatively.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Beckett, C., Med. Hist., 2004, 48, 245– 260.

  • Ridley, M., Francis Crick – Discoverer of the Genetic Code, Harper Perennial, London, UK, 2008.

  • Olby, R., Francis Crick: Hunter of Life’s Secrets, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, New York, USA, 2009.

  • Sri Kantha, S., Curr. Sci., 2013, 104(9), 1237–1239.

  • Hollander, P., Acad. Questions, 2001–02, 15(1), 63–76.

  • Giles, C. L. and Councill, I. G., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2004, 101, 17599– 17604.

  • Butler, D., Nature, 2004, 432, 790.

  • Scrivener, L., J. Acad. Libr., 2009, 35(3), 241–251.

  • Sri Kantha, S., Rev. Agric. Sci. (Jpn), 2016, 4, 66–72; doi:10.7831/ras.4.66.

  • Crick, F. H. C. and Hughes, A. F. W., Exp. Cell Res., 1950, 1(1), 37–80.

  • Crick, F. H. C., Exp. Cell Res., 1950, 1(4), 505–533.

  • Watson, J. D. and Crick, F. H. C., Nature, 1953, 171, 737–738.

  • Crick, F. H. C., Acta Crystallogr., 1953, 6, 689–697.

  • Crick, F. H. C., Barnett, L., Brenner, S. and Watts-Tobin, R. J., Nature, 1961, 192, 1227–1232.

  • Crick, F. H. C., J. Mol. Biol., 1966, 19, 548–555.

  • Crick, F., Nature, 1970, 225, 420–422.

  • Crick, F. H. C., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 1976, 73, 2639–2643.

  • Crick, F., Science, 1979, 204, 264–271.

  • Crick, F. and Mitchison, G., Nature, 1983, 304, 111–114.

  • Crick, F., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 1984, 81, 4586–4590.

  • Crick, F., Nature, 1989, 337, 129–132.

  • Crick, F. and Mitchison, G., Behav. Brain Res., 1995, 69, 147–155.

  • Crick, F., Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, Ser. B, 1999, 354, 2021–2025.

  • Crick, F. and Koch, C., Nature Neurosci., 2003, 6, 119–126.

  • Hyland, K., Written Commun., 2003, 20(3), 242–268.

  • Cronin, B., Shaw, D. and La Barre, K., J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2003, 54(9), 855–871.

  • Crick, F., Nature, 1970, 227, 561–563.

  • Magdoff, B. S. and Crick, F. H. C., Acta Crystallogr., 1955, 8, 461–468

  • Magdoff, B. S., Crick, F. H. C. and Luzzati, V., Acta Crystallogr., 1956, 9, 156– 162.

  • Munro, M. and Crick, F., Symp. Soc. Exp. Biol., 1971, 25, 439–453.

  • Lawrence, P. A., Crick, F. H. C. and Munro, M., J. Cell Sci., 1972, 11, 815– 853.

  • Crick, F. H. C. and Orgel, L. E., Icarus, 1973, 19, 341–346.

  • Crick, F. H. C., Perspect. Biol. Med., 1973, 17(1), 67–70.

  • Chargaff, E., Nature, 1974, 248, 776– 779.

  • Hartree, E. F., Nature, 1975, 255, 8.

  • Day, R. A., How to Write and Publish a Scientific Paper, Oryx Press, Phoenix, AZ, 1988, 3rd edn, pp. 47–48.


Abstract Views: 364

PDF Views: 108




  • Acknowledgements in Francis Crick’s Papers Appearing in Science Journals

Abstract Views: 364  |  PDF Views: 108

Authors

Sachi Sri Kantha
Section of General Education, Gifu University, 1-1 Yanagido, Gifu City 501-1193, Japan

Abstract


Apart from citation counting, the study of recorded acknowledgements by researchers as a recognizable metric to evaluate peer influence is currently gaining momentum. As a metric, acknowledgements have an advantage over citations. Whereas citations can be copied and pasted from one publication to the next by an unscrupulous researcher without being studied in depth, acknowledgements cannot be lifted in such a duplicitous style. Here I present an exploratory survey of acknowledgement patterns in journal papers by Francis Crick. Five principal categories (namely, moral, financial, editorial, instrumental/technical and conceptual) were studied from 104 papers authored by Crick, either solely or collaboratively, over a span of five decades. To the best of my knowledge, there are no earlier studies where acknowledgement patterns of a well-recognized interdisciplinary scientist are reported cumulatively.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv112%2Fi08%2F1768-1771