Current Science

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Estimation of Crop Coefficients and Water Productivity of Mustard (Brassica juncea) under Semi-Arid Conditions


Affiliations
1 Division of Agricultural Engineering, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, India
2 Water Technology Centre, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, India
 

Experiment was conducted using weighing-type field lysimeters to determine single and dual crop coefficients (Kc) and to estimate water productivity of mustard (Brassica juncea) cultivar, Pusa Vijay (NPJ-93) during rabi 2013-14 and 2014-15. It was observed that the single crop coefficient (Kc) during rabi 2013-14 was 0.39, 0.72, 1.02 and 0.5 for initial, development, mid and late stages respectively. While in dual Kc the value of Kcb (basal crop coefficient) was 0.19, 0.55, 0.91 and 0.24 for the four stages, respectively. During rabi 2014-15, the single Kc was 0.36, 0.63, 1.04 and 0.44 and for dual Kc the value of Kcb was 0.17, 0.46, 0.91 and 0.23 for four stages respectively. Relationship between Kcb and leaf area index as well as between Kcb and growing degree days was also established. Water productivity was estimated to be 14.9 kg/ha-mm corresponding to grain yield of 2.34 t ha-1 with 157 mm of total irrigation water applied during rabi 2013-14. Whereas during rabi 2014-15, water productivity was 15.4 kg/ha-mm with grain yield of 2.89 t ha-1 with 187 mm depth of applied irrigation. Nonetheless, the estimated crop coefficients of mustard can be used for judicious irrigation scheduling in order to enhance water productivity in semi-arid environment.

Keywords

Brassica juncea, Crop Coefficient, Evapotranspiration, Leaf Area Index, Water Productivity.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Hamdy, A. and Lacirignola, D., Mediterranean water resources: major challenges toward 21st century. CIHEAM-IAM Bari, Italy, 1999, p. 570.

  • Katerji, N. and Rana, G., Crop evapotranspiration measurement and estimation in the Mediterranean region, INRA-CRA, Bari, Italy, 2008, p. 173; ISBN 978 8 89015 241 2.

  • Tyagi, N. K., Sharma, D. K. and Luthra, S. K., Determination of evapotranspiration and crop coefficients of rice and sunflower with lysimeter. Agric. Water Manage., 2000, 45, 41–54.

  • Kashyap, P. S. and Panda, R. K., Evaluation of evapotranspiration estimation methods and development of crop-coefficients for potato crop in a sub-humid region. Agric. Water Manage., 2001, 50, 9–25.

  • Irmak, S., Estimating crop evapotranspiration from reference evapotranspiration and crop coefficients. University of Nebraska-Lincoln, USA, NebGuide, 1994; http://extension.unl.edu/publications.

  • Martins, J. D. et al., Dual crop coefficients for maize in southern Brazil: model testing for sprinkler and drip irrigation and mulched soil. Biosyst. Eng.., 2013, 115, 291–310.

  • Jensen, M. E., Option by agricultural plants. In Water Deficits and Plant Growth (ed. Kozlowski, T. T.), Academic Press, New York, 1968, vol. 2, pp. 1–22.

  • Doorenbos, J. and Pruitt, W. O., Guidelines for predicting crop water requirements. Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 24, Food and Agriculture Organization of United Nations (FAO-UNO), Rome, Italy, 1975.

  • Doorenbos, J. and Pruitt, W. O., Crop water requirements. FAO Irrigation Drainage Paper No. 24, FAO, Rome, Italy, 1977.

  • Burman, R. D., Nixon, P. R., Wright, J. L. and Pruitt, W. O., Water requirements, In Design of Farm Irrigation Systems (ed. Jensen, M. E.), ASAE Monograph, American Society of Agricultural Engineers, St. Joseph, MI, USA, 1980, pp. 189–232.

  • Allen, R. G., Pereira, L. S., Raes, D. and Smith, M., Crop evapotranspiration: guidelines for computing crop water requirements. Irrigation and Drainage Paper 56, UN-FAO, Rome, Italy, 1998.

  • Allen, R. G. and Pereira, L. S., Estimating crop coefficients from fraction of ground cover and height. Irrig. Sci., 2009, 28, 17–34.

  • Parekh, F., Crop water requirement using single and dual crop coefficient approach. Int. J. Innov. Res. Sci. Eng. Technol., 2013, 2, 4493–4499.

  • Shekhawat, K., Rathor, S. S., Premi, O. P., Kandpal, B. K. and Chauhan, J. S., Advances in agronomic management of Indian mustard (Brassica juncea (L.) Czernj. Cosson): an overview. Int. J. Agron., 2012, 2012, 1–14.

  • Parihar, S. S. and Sandhu, B. S., Irrigation of field crops: principles and practices. Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi, 1987, p. 142.

  • Shankar, V., Ojha, C. S. P. and Hari Prasad, K. S., Irrigation scheduling for maize and Indian-mustard based on daily crop water requirement in a semi-arid region. World Acad. Sci., Eng. Technol., 2012, 63, 563–572.

  • Pradhan, S., Sehgal, V. K., Das, D. K., Jain, A. K., Bandhyopadhyay, K. K., Singh, R. and Sharma, P. K., Effect of weather on seed yield and radiation and water use efficiency of mustard cultivars in a semi-arid environment. Agric. Water Manage., 2014, 139, 43–52.

  • Amoah, L. K., Darko, R. O. and Sekyere, J. D., Water requirement, deficit irrigation and crop coefficient of hot pepper (Capsicum frutescens var legon 18) using irrigation interval of two days. ARPN J. Agric. Biol. Sci., 2013, 8, 139–146.

  • Howell, T. A., Schneider, A. D. and Jensen, M. E., History of lysimeter design and use for evapotranspiration measurement. In Proceeding of International Symposium on Lysimetry, Honolulu, Hawaii, 23–25 July 1991, pp. 1–9.

  • Doorenbos, J. and Kassam, A. H., Yield response to water. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 33, FAO, Rome, Italy, 1979.

  • Jensen, M. E., Burman, R. D. and Allen, R. G., Evapotranspiration and irrigation water requirements. ASCE Manuals and Reports on Engineering Practice, ISBN 978-0872627635, No. 70, 1990.

  • Majnooni-Heris, A., Sadraddini, A. A., Nazemi, A. H., Shakiba, M. R., Neyshaburi, M. R. and Tuzel, I. H., Determination of single and dual crop coefficients and ratio of transpiration to evapotranspiration for canola. Ann. Biol. Res., 2012, 3(4), 1885–1894.

  • Shenkut, A., Tesfaye, K. and Abegaz, F., Determination of water requirement and crop coefficient for sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) at Melkassa, Ethiopia. Sci., Technol. Arts Res. J., 2013, 2(3), 16–24.

  • Silva, V., Borges, C., Farias, C., Singh, V. P., Albuquerque, W. G. and Silva, B. B., Water requirements and single and dual crop coefficients of sugarcane grown in a tropical region. Braz. Agric. Sci., 2012, 3, 274–286.

  • Adak, T., Chakravarty, N. V. K., Muthukumar, M., Deshmukh, P. S., Joshi, H. C. and Katiyar, R. K., Evaluation of biomass and thermal energy utilization efficiency of oilseed Brassica (Brassica juncea) under altered microenvironments. Biomass Bioenerg., 2011, 35, 2254–2267.


Abstract Views: 360

PDF Views: 129




  • Estimation of Crop Coefficients and Water Productivity of Mustard (Brassica juncea) under Semi-Arid Conditions

Abstract Views: 360  |  PDF Views: 129

Authors

A. Gupta
Division of Agricultural Engineering, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, India
A. Sarangi
Water Technology Centre, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, India
D. K. Singh
Division of Agricultural Engineering, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, India

Abstract


Experiment was conducted using weighing-type field lysimeters to determine single and dual crop coefficients (Kc) and to estimate water productivity of mustard (Brassica juncea) cultivar, Pusa Vijay (NPJ-93) during rabi 2013-14 and 2014-15. It was observed that the single crop coefficient (Kc) during rabi 2013-14 was 0.39, 0.72, 1.02 and 0.5 for initial, development, mid and late stages respectively. While in dual Kc the value of Kcb (basal crop coefficient) was 0.19, 0.55, 0.91 and 0.24 for the four stages, respectively. During rabi 2014-15, the single Kc was 0.36, 0.63, 1.04 and 0.44 and for dual Kc the value of Kcb was 0.17, 0.46, 0.91 and 0.23 for four stages respectively. Relationship between Kcb and leaf area index as well as between Kcb and growing degree days was also established. Water productivity was estimated to be 14.9 kg/ha-mm corresponding to grain yield of 2.34 t ha-1 with 157 mm of total irrigation water applied during rabi 2013-14. Whereas during rabi 2014-15, water productivity was 15.4 kg/ha-mm with grain yield of 2.89 t ha-1 with 187 mm depth of applied irrigation. Nonetheless, the estimated crop coefficients of mustard can be used for judicious irrigation scheduling in order to enhance water productivity in semi-arid environment.

Keywords


Brassica juncea, Crop Coefficient, Evapotranspiration, Leaf Area Index, Water Productivity.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv113%2Fi02%2F264-271