Current Science

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

A Comparative Assessment of the Seismic Response of an Earthen Dam Using Analytical Simulation and Empirical Methods


Affiliations
1 Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Trombay, Mumbai 400 085, India
2 Civil Engineering Department, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, Kharagpur 721 302, India
 

This article presents the permanent deformation of an earthen dam located in the vicinity of a safety related structure for Mw = 6.5 design basis earthquake. A non-linear 2D dynamic analysis using a real earthquake motion compatible with the design spectrum was performed to check the earthquake-induced deformations of the dam. Deformations of the dam were also estimated by semi-empirical and empirical methods suc has Seed and Makdisi’s method, Newmark’s double integration method, Jansen’s method and Swaisgood’s method. Results from different methods are compared to obtain a range for the value of permanent deformations of the dam. It is observed that the lateral deformation obtained by Seed and Makdisi’s method is the highest while Jansen’s method predicts the highest crest settlement. The crest settlement of the dam is found to vary between 11.8 mm and 17.8 mm, which is within the safety limits according to IITK-GSDMA guidelines.

Keywords

Earthen Dam, Dynamic Analysis, Deformations, Non-Linear Finite Element Analysis.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • USBR, Seismic design and analysis of embankment dams, Design Standards. Chapter 13, In United States Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation, Denver, Colorado, DS-13(13)-7, 1989.

  • IS:1893, Indian Standard criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures, Part 1 – general provisions and buildings, Bureau of Indian Standards, Fifth Revision, New Delhi, 2001.

  • Newmark, N. M., Effects of earthquakes on dams and embankments. Geotechnique, 1965, 15(2), 139–159.

  • Makdisi, F. I. and Seed, H. B., Simplified procedure for estimating dam and embankment earthquake induced deformations. J. Geotech. Eng. Div., 1978, 104(7), 849–867.

  • Jansen, R. B., Estimation of embankment dam settlement caused by earthquake. Int. Water Power Dam Constr., 1990, 42(12), 35–40.

  • Swaisgood, J. R., Estimating deformation of embankment dams caused by earthquakes. In ASDSO Western Regional Conference, Montana, USA, 1995, pp. 1–7.

  • Singh, R., Roy, D. and Jain, S. K., Analysis of earth dams affected by the 2001 Bhuj Earthquake. Eng. Geol., 2005, 80, 282–291.

  • Basudhar, P. K., Rao, N. S. V. K., Bhookya, M. and Dey, A., 2D FEM analysis of earth and rockfill dam under seismic condition. In 5th International Conference on Recent Advances in Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics, 2010.

  • Seed, H. B. and Idriss, I. M., Soil modulii and damping factors for dynamic response analysis. Report EERC, 70–10, University of California, Berkeley, 1970.

  • Hardin, B. O. and Drenvich, V. P., Shear modulus and damping in soils: design equations and curves. J. Soil Mech. Found. Div., 1972, 98(7), 667–692.

  • Gutenberg, B. and Richter, C. F., Earthquake magnitude, intensity, energy and acceleration (second paper). Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 1956, 46(2), 105–145.

  • Idriss, I. M., Evaluating seismic risk in engineering practice. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, San Francisco, USA, 1985, vol. 1, pp. 255–320.

  • Ghosh, A. K., Rao, K. S. and Kushwaha, H. S., Development for UHRS for Tarapur, Trombay and Kakrapara Sites. Report BARC/2003/E/019, 2003.

  • Sengupta, A., Estimation of permanent displacements of the Tehri dam in the Himalayas due to future strong earthquakes. Sadhana, 2010, 35(3), 373–392.

  • Ghaboussi, J. and Wilson, E. L., Seismic analysis of earth dam reservoir systems. J. Soil Mech. Found. Div., 1973, 99(10), 849–862.

  • Dakoulas, P. and Gazetas, G., A class of inhomogeneous shear models for seismic response of dams and embankments. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 1985, 4(4), 166–182.

  • Seed, H. B. and Sun, J. H., Implication of site effects in the Mexico City earthquake of 19 September 1985 for Earthquakeresistancedesign criteria in the San Francisco Bay Area of California. In Report No. UCB/EERC-89/03, University of California, Berkeley, USA, 1989.

  • Bishop, A. W., The use of slip circles in the stability analysis of earth slopes. Geotechnique, 1955, 5(1), 7–17.

  • Seed, H. B. and Martin, G. R., The seismic coefficient in earth dam design. J. Soil Mech. Found. Div., 1966, 92(3), 25–58.

  • Seed, H. B. and Idriss, I. M., A simplified procedure for evaluating soil liquefaction potential. J. Soil Mech. Found. Div., ASCE, 1971, 97(9), 1249–1274.

  • IIT-K, GSDMA guidelines for seismic design of earth dams and embankments, 2007.


Abstract Views: 430

PDF Views: 134




  • A Comparative Assessment of the Seismic Response of an Earthen Dam Using Analytical Simulation and Empirical Methods

Abstract Views: 430  |  PDF Views: 134

Authors

Srijit Bandyopadhyay
Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Trombay, Mumbai 400 085, India
Raj Banerjee
Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Trombay, Mumbai 400 085, India
Aniruddha Sengupta
Civil Engineering Department, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, Kharagpur 721 302, India
Y. M. Parulekar
Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Trombay, Mumbai 400 085, India
G. R. Reddy
Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Trombay, Mumbai 400 085, India

Abstract


This article presents the permanent deformation of an earthen dam located in the vicinity of a safety related structure for Mw = 6.5 design basis earthquake. A non-linear 2D dynamic analysis using a real earthquake motion compatible with the design spectrum was performed to check the earthquake-induced deformations of the dam. Deformations of the dam were also estimated by semi-empirical and empirical methods suc has Seed and Makdisi’s method, Newmark’s double integration method, Jansen’s method and Swaisgood’s method. Results from different methods are compared to obtain a range for the value of permanent deformations of the dam. It is observed that the lateral deformation obtained by Seed and Makdisi’s method is the highest while Jansen’s method predicts the highest crest settlement. The crest settlement of the dam is found to vary between 11.8 mm and 17.8 mm, which is within the safety limits according to IITK-GSDMA guidelines.

Keywords


Earthen Dam, Dynamic Analysis, Deformations, Non-Linear Finite Element Analysis.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv113%2Fi05%2F902-910