Current Science

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Study on the Establishment of a Diversified National Ambient Noise Monitoring Network in Seven Major Cities of India


Affiliations
1 CSIR-National Physical Laboratory, New Delhi 110 012, India
2 Central Pollution Control Board, Parivesh Bhawan, East Arjun Nagar, Delhi 110 032, India
3 Delhi Technological University, Delhi 110 042, India
 

We describe the diversified National Ambient Noise Monitoring Network (NANMN) set up across 7 major cities of India and covering 70 stations for continuous noise monitoring throughout the year. The annual average Lday (06–22 h) and Lnight (22–06 h) values observed in 2015 for these 70 locations are described. Of these, 25 locations are in commercial zones, 12 in industrial, 16 in residential and 17 in silence zones. Each city has 10 noise monitoring stations installed for analysing environmental noise pollution levels round the clock (24 x 365 h). The long-term noise monitoring shows that ambient noise levels are very high compared to the recommended standards for some sites and thus noise abatement measures are essentially required for controlling these levels. The present study is focused on evaluation, analysis and reporting of environmental noise pollution in seven major cities of India and is instrumental in planning for the noise abatement measures for controlling noise pollution in these cities. Such a noise monitoring network established in India is unique and one of the largest noise monitoring networks of its kind across the globe.

Keywords

Day Equivalent Level, Day–Night Average Sound Level, National Ambient Noise Monitoring Network, Night Equivalent Level.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Green, M. S., Schwartz, K., Harari, G. and Najenson, T., Industrial noise exposure and ambulatory blood pressure and heart rate. J. Occup. Med., 1991, 33, 879–883.

  • Lang, T., Fouriaud, C. and Jacquinet-Salord, M. C., Length of occupational noise exposure and blood pressure. Int. Arch. Occup. Environ. Health, 1992, 63, 369–372.

  • Fogari, R., Zoppi, A., Vanasia, A., Marasi, G. and Villa, G., Occupational noise exposure and blood pressure. J. Hypertens., 1994, 12, 475–479.

  • Hessel, P. A. and Sluis-Cremer, G. K., Occupational noise exposure and blood pressure: longitudinal and cross-sectional observations in a group of underground miners. Arch. Environ. Health, 1994, 49, 128–134.

  • Babisch, W., Traffic noise and cardiovascular disease: epidemiological review and synthesis. Noise Health, 2000, 2(8), 9–32.

  • Basner, M., Babisch, W., Davis, A., Brink, M., Clark, C., Janssen, S. and Stansfield, S., Auditory and non-auditory effects of noise on health. The Lancet, 2014, 383, 1325–1332.

  • Munzel, T., Gori, T., Babisch, W. and Basner, M., Cardiovascular effects of environmental noise exposure. Eur. Heart J., 2014, 35, 829–836.

  • van Kempen, E. and Babisch, W., The quantitative relationship between road traffic noise and hypertension: a meta-analysis. J. Hypertens., 2012, 30, 1075–1086.

  • Banerjee, D., Association between transportation noise and cardiovascular disease: a meta analysis of cross-sectional studies amongst adult populations from 1980 to 2010. Indian J. Public Health, 2014, 58, 84–91.

  • Banerjee, D., Das, P. P. and Foujdar, A., Association between road traffic noise and prevalence of coronary heart disease. Environ. Monit. Assess., 2014, 186, 2885–2893.

  • Ohrstrom, E. and Skanberg, A., Sleep disturbances from road traffic and ventilation noise-laboratory and field experiments. J. Sound Vibr., 2004, 271, 279–296.

  • WHO-JRC. Burden of disease from environmental noisequantification of healthy life years last in Europe. European Center for Environment and Health, JRC EU, 2011.

  • Garg, N., Sinha, A. K., Gandhi, V., Bhardwaj, R. M. and Akolkar, A. B., A pilot study on establishment of ambient noise monitoring network across the major cities of India. Appl. Acoust., 2016, 103, 20–29.

  • The Noise Pollution (Regulation and Control) rules, 2000, Ministry of Environment and Forests, India; http://envfor.nic.in/downloads/public-information/noise-pollution-rules-en.pdf

  • Geonica Earth sciences, Spain; www.geonica.com.

  • SGS Weather and Environmental Systems Pvt Ltd, New Delhi, India; http://www.sgsweather.com

  • CPCB, Ambient Noise monitoring data display site; http://www.cpcbnoise.com

  • World Health Organization, Night Noise guidelines for Europe. Copenhagen, WHO Regional Office for Europe, 2009.

  • Chowdhury, A. K., Debsarkar, A. and Chakrabarty, S., Critical assessment of day time traffic noise level at curbside open-air microenvironment of Kolkata city, India. J. Environ. Health Sci. Eng., 2015, 13, 65.

  • Sagar, T. V. and Rao, N. G., Noise pollution levels in Vishakhapatnam City (India). J. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2006, 48, 139–142.

  • Banerjee, D., Chakraborty, K. S., Bhattacharyya, S. and Gangopadhyay, A., Evaluation and analysis of road traffic noise in Asnasol: an industrial town of eastern India. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 2008, 5, 165–171.

  • Goswami, S., Road traffic noise: a case study of Balasore town, Orissa, India. Int. J. Environ. Res., 2009, 3, 309–318.

  • Kisku, G. C. et al., Profile of noise pollution in Lucknow city and its impact on environment. J. Environ. Biol., 2006, 27, 409–142.

  • Joshi, A. N., Joshi, N. C. and Rane, P. P., Noise mapping in Mumbai city, India. Int. J. Innov. Sci. Eng. Technol., 2015, 2, 380–385.

  • US Department of Housing and Urban Development, Environmental Criteria and Standards, 24 CFR Part 51, Vol. 12, July 1979, amended by 49FR 880, 6 January 1984.

  • Garg, N., Kumar, A., Saini, P. K. and Maji, S., A retrospective view of ambient noise standards in India: status and proposed revision. Noise Control Eng. J., 2015, 63, 266–278.

  • Szumilas, M., Explaining odds ratios. J. Can. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry, 2010, 19, 227–229.

  • Garg, N. and Maji, S., A retrospective view of noise pollution control policy in India: status, proposed revisions and control measures. Curr. Sci., 2016, 111(1), 29–38.

  • Olayinka, O. S., Effective noise control measures and sustainable development in Nigeria. World J. Environ. Eng., 2013, 1, 5–15.

  • Garg, N., Sharma, O. and Maji, S., Experimental investigations on sound insulation through single, double and triple window glazing for traffic noise abatement. J. Sci. Ind. Res., 2011, 78, 471–478.

  • Garg, N. and Vishesh, Maji, S., Fuzzy TOPSIS approach in selection of optimal noise barrier for traffic noise abatement. Ach. Acoust., 2015, 40, 453–467.

  • Garg, N., Kumar, A. and Maji, S., Significance and implications of airborne sound insulation criteria in building elements for traffic noise abatement. Appl. Acoust., 2013, 74, 1429–1435.

  • Rasmussen, B., Sound insulation between dwellings – requirements in building regulations in Europe. Appl. Acoust., 2010, 71, 373–385.

  • Garg, N., Kumar, A. and Maji, S., Parametric sensitivity analysis of factors affecting sound insulation of double glazing using Taguchi method. Appl. Acoust., 2013, 74, 1406–1413.

  • Amundsen, A. H., Klæboe, R. and Aasvang, G. M., The Norwegian facade insulation study: the efficacy of facade sound insulation in reducing noise annoyance due to road traffic. J Acoust. Soc. Am., 2011, 129, 1381–1389.

  • Dintrans, A. M. and Prendez, M., A method of assessing measures to reduce road traffic noise: a case study in Santiago, Chile. Appl. Acoust., 2013, 74, 1486–1491.

  • Naish, D., A method of developing regional road traffic noise management strategies. Appl. Acoust., 2010, 71, 640–652.


Abstract Views: 380

PDF Views: 139




  • Study on the Establishment of a Diversified National Ambient Noise Monitoring Network in Seven Major Cities of India

Abstract Views: 380  |  PDF Views: 139

Authors

N. Garg
CSIR-National Physical Laboratory, New Delhi 110 012, India
A. K. Sinha
Central Pollution Control Board, Parivesh Bhawan, East Arjun Nagar, Delhi 110 032, India
M. K. Sharma
Delhi Technological University, Delhi 110 042, India
V. Gandhi
Central Pollution Control Board, Parivesh Bhawan, East Arjun Nagar, Delhi 110 032, India
R. M. Bhardwaj
Central Pollution Control Board, Parivesh Bhawan, East Arjun Nagar, Delhi 110 032, India
A. B. Akolkar
Central Pollution Control Board, Parivesh Bhawan, East Arjun Nagar, Delhi 110 032, India
R. K. Singh
Delhi Technological University, Delhi 110 042, India

Abstract


We describe the diversified National Ambient Noise Monitoring Network (NANMN) set up across 7 major cities of India and covering 70 stations for continuous noise monitoring throughout the year. The annual average Lday (06–22 h) and Lnight (22–06 h) values observed in 2015 for these 70 locations are described. Of these, 25 locations are in commercial zones, 12 in industrial, 16 in residential and 17 in silence zones. Each city has 10 noise monitoring stations installed for analysing environmental noise pollution levels round the clock (24 x 365 h). The long-term noise monitoring shows that ambient noise levels are very high compared to the recommended standards for some sites and thus noise abatement measures are essentially required for controlling these levels. The present study is focused on evaluation, analysis and reporting of environmental noise pollution in seven major cities of India and is instrumental in planning for the noise abatement measures for controlling noise pollution in these cities. Such a noise monitoring network established in India is unique and one of the largest noise monitoring networks of its kind across the globe.

Keywords


Day Equivalent Level, Day–Night Average Sound Level, National Ambient Noise Monitoring Network, Night Equivalent Level.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv113%2Fi07%2F1367-1383