Current Science

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Visions for India:Public Participation, Debate and the S&T Community


Affiliations
1 DST Centre for Policy Research, Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, Hauz Khas, New Delhi 110 016, India
 

This article is an exploration into the nature, width and scope of science and technology visioning exercises in India, particularly in the context of how these narratives are presented and discussed in Current Science, one of India’s premier science journals. We categorize these visions into two broad categories – one is a vision that is more individual and/or domain-specific; the other is the institutionalized vision that has a larger mandate and canvas and that creates imaginaries of the future and/or provides horizons for society and S&T to move towards. Prominent examples of the latter are India’s Technology Vision 2020 and the most recent, Technology Vision 2035. We observe that visioning exercises in the country have been and continue to be taken up quite prominently, but narratives and debates around them are present only marginally in Current Science. We discuss possible reasons for this and conclude with the hope that more attention will be paid to such exercises and documents on the accounts of investments that are made in them, on the implications these visions have and the importance of imaginaries of the future they create for society, country and for S&T.

Keywords

Technology Visions, Technology Assessment, Visioning Exercise.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • TIFAC, Technology Vision 2035, 2015.

  • Ramalingaswami, V., A vision of molecular science and medicine – Inaugural address delivered at the International Symposium on Bio-molecular structure and Biomedicine, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, December 1984. Curr. Sci., 1998, 75, 539–540.

  • WHO. Malaria vaccine development, 2016; http://www.who.int/malaria/areas/vaccine/en/

  • TIFAC. TIFAC Annual Report 1993–94, 1994.

  • PC, Report of the Committee on India Vision 2020, 2002.

  • GoI, 10th Five Year Plan 2002–2007, 2002, p. 232; http://planningcommission.nic.in/plans/planrel/fiveyr/10th/volume1/10th_vol1.pdf

  • CRRID, State Development Report of Punjab, 2002.

  • Sen, N., Vision document on biotechnology. Curr. Sci., 2001, 81, 1157.

  • Blurred Vision, India Today, 1998; http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/andhra-pradesh-cm-chandrababu-naidu-faces-problems-with-andhra-pradesh-vision-2020/1/265575.html

  • Andhra Pradesh Vision 2020 – Strategy for Sustainable Agricultural Growth, New Age International (P) Limited, 2001.

  • GoK, Karnataka – A vision for Development, 2009; http://www.karnataka.gov.in/spb/KarnatakaVisionDocument/Vision2020_English30jan2010.pdf

  • DoNER. North Eastern Region Vision 2020, 2008.

  • GoTN, Tamil Nadu 2023 – Strategic Plan for Infrastructure Development in Tamil Nadu, 2012.

  • MPPC, Vision 2018, 2013; http://mpplanningcommission.gov.in/Vision2018English.pdf

  • Himachal Pradesh government launches pehal vision document. Current Affairs, 2016.

  • IANS, ‘Technology Vision 2035’: India bets on technology to overcome challenges. The Financial Express, 2016; http://www.financialexpress.com/article/industry/tech/technology-vision-2035-india-bets-on-technology-to-overcome-challenges/192653/

  • Prasad, R., Organic farming vis-a-vis modern agriculture. Curr.Sci., 2005, 89, 252–253.

  • Abrol, I. P. and Sangar, S., Sustaining Indian agriculture – conservation agriculture the way forward. Curr. Sci., 2006, 91, 1020–1025.

  • Maikhuri, R. K. et al., Traditional agriculture systems. Curr. Sci., 2015, 108, 1581–1583.

  • Ramani, R., Sharma, K. K., Monobrullah, M. and Mohanasundaram, A., Harnessing desirable insects and managing undesirable insects: way forward in Indian agriculture. Curr. Sci., 2015, 109, 2179–2180.

  • Ely, A., Van Zwanenberg, P. and Stirling, A., New Models of Technology Assessment for Development – STEPS Working Paper, 2011.

  • Dylander, B., Technology assessment: as science and as tools for policy. Acta Sociol., 1980, 23, 217–236.

  • Rip, A. and te Kulve, H., In The Yearbook of Nanotechnology in Society, Volume 1: Presenting Futures (eds Fisher, E., Selin, C. and Wetmore, J. M.), Springer, 2008, pp. 49–70.

  • Johnson, D. G. and Wetmore, J. M., In The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies (eds Hackett, E. J. et al.), The MIT Press, 2008, pp. 568–581.

  • von Schomberg, R., In Technikfolgen Abschatzen Lehren: Bildungspotenziale Transdisziplinarer Methoden (eds Dusseldorp, M. and Beecroft, R.), 2011.

  • Owen, R., Macnaghten, P. and Stilgoe, J., Responsible research and innovation: from science in society to science for society, with society. Sci. Public Policy, 2012, 39, 751–760.

  • Hackett, E. J., Amsterdamska, O., Lynch, M. and Wajcman, J., The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, 2007, 3rd edn.

  • Jasanoff, S., In Encyclopedia of Science and Technology Ethics (ed. Mitcham, C.), Thomson Gale, 2005, pp. xix–xxvii.

  • Van Zwanenberg, P., Ely, A. and Stirling, A., Emerging Technologies and Opportunities for International Science and Technology Foresight, 2009.

  • Rip, A., Misa, T. J. and Schot, J., Managing Technology in Society: The Approach of Constructive Technology Assessment, Pinter, 1995.

  • Kluver, J. et al., European Participatory Technology Assessment: Participatory Methods in Technology Assessment and Technology Decision-Making, 2000.

  • Guston, D. and Sarewitz, D., Real-time technology assessment. Technol. Soc., 2002, 24, 93–109.

  • Rejeski, D., Open-Source Technology Assessment or e.TA, 2005.

  • Hirakawa, H., Outline of the Project Deliberation and Collaboration between Citizens and Scientists (DeCoCiS), Introduction to the session on Empowering Citizens and Scientists to engage in Deliberative Dialouge Community-based Research and Technology Assessment, 2010.

  • Yoshizawa, G., Third Generation of Technology Assessment, 2010.

  • Johnston, R., Technology Planning in Major Asian Countries: An Analysis of Recent Foresight Reports from China and India & Comparison with Japan and Korea, 2005.

  • Schot, J. and Rip, A., The past and future of constructive technology assessment. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang., 1996, 54, 251–268.

  • TIFAC, TIFAC at 25, 2013.

  • Abdul Kalam, A. P. J. and Rajan, Y. S., India 2020: A Vision for the New Millenium, Penguin, 1998.

  • Pattnayak, K., Visions of development: the inevitable need for alternatives. Futures, 2004, 36, 671–678.

  • Yashpal, India – 2020: a vision for the New Millenium. Curr. Sci., 1998, 75, 1415–1417.

  • Mehrotra, R. C., India in 2020. Curr. Sci., 1999, 76, 1173–1174.

  • MST. Science, Technology and Innovation Policy 2013, 2013, p. 22.

  • Mane, R., Science, technology and innovation policy. Curr. Sci., 2012, 103, 975–976.

  • Pani, N., Towards a socially consistent science and technology policy. Curr. Sci., 2016, 110, 1624–1629.

  • Sangar, S., Socio-economic empowerment of women through ‘Science, Technology and Innovation Policy, 2013’ – the missing link? Curr. Sci., 2014, 106, 1074–1080.

  • Sheikh, F. A., Science, technology and innovation policy 2013 of India and informal sector innovations. Curr. Sci., 2014, 106, 21–23.

  • Mukhopadhyay, D., Science, technology and innovation policy 2013: outline of a coherent strategy for translating it into action. Curr. Sci., 2015, 109, 863–868.

  • Roy, R., Value of introducing the ‘science, technology and society’ perspective into Indian Science. Curr. Sci., 2009, 96.

  • Rajagopalachari, C., The Future of Indian Science. Curr. Sci., 1947, 3.

  • SERC, Vision 2005: Earth Sciences. Curr. Sci., 1996, 71, 820–823.

  • Chopra, K. L., Technical education – Vision 2010. Curr. Sci., 1997, 72, 538–541

  • Kabiraj, S. B., Science in India: Vision and reality. Curr. Sci., 1995, 68, 569–570.

  • Balaram, P., Visions and nightmares. Curr. Sci., 2000, 78, 5–6.

  • Dwivedi, B. N., Malaviya’s vision on science and technology: celebrating his 150th birth anniversary. Curr. Sci., 2010, 99, 1492–1493.

  • Padmanabhan, G., An assessment of the current Indian scene in biotechnology. Curr. Sci., 1991, 60, 510–513

  • Gupta, S. K. and Deshpande, R. D., Water for India in 2050: firstorder assessment of available options. Curr. Sci., 2004, 86, 1216–1223.


Abstract Views: 270

PDF Views: 94




  • Visions for India:Public Participation, Debate and the S&T Community

Abstract Views: 270  |  PDF Views: 94

Authors

Pankaj Sekhsaria
DST Centre for Policy Research, Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, Hauz Khas, New Delhi 110 016, India
Naveen Thayyil
DST Centre for Policy Research, Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, Hauz Khas, New Delhi 110 016, India

Abstract


This article is an exploration into the nature, width and scope of science and technology visioning exercises in India, particularly in the context of how these narratives are presented and discussed in Current Science, one of India’s premier science journals. We categorize these visions into two broad categories – one is a vision that is more individual and/or domain-specific; the other is the institutionalized vision that has a larger mandate and canvas and that creates imaginaries of the future and/or provides horizons for society and S&T to move towards. Prominent examples of the latter are India’s Technology Vision 2020 and the most recent, Technology Vision 2035. We observe that visioning exercises in the country have been and continue to be taken up quite prominently, but narratives and debates around them are present only marginally in Current Science. We discuss possible reasons for this and conclude with the hope that more attention will be paid to such exercises and documents on the accounts of investments that are made in them, on the implications these visions have and the importance of imaginaries of the future they create for society, country and for S&T.

Keywords


Technology Visions, Technology Assessment, Visioning Exercise.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv113%2Fi10%2F1835-1840