Current Science

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

The Science behind Archaeological Signatures from Space


Affiliations
1 Indian Space Research Organization Headquarters, Bengaluru 560 231, India
2 National Institute of Advanced Studies, IISc Campus, Bengaluru 560 012, India
 

Archaeology has traditionally focused on studying historic or prehistoric people and their cultures by analysis of their artefacts, inscriptions, monuments and other such material remains, especially those that have been documented from excavations. This focus is somewhat narrow, because it excludes many new methods that have emerged in the last few decades (described in detail by Prabhakar and Korisettar in this special section (page 1873)). One such novel method is to study large imprints on the landscape caused by human activity. These tell-tale features include soil marks, crop marks, drainage patterns, field boundaries and a host of man-made structures, whose study can provide additional cultural insights. In some cases, these features are difficult to detect by the naked eye at ground level, but are detectable by remote sensing techniques from aerial/space-based platforms in a non-destructive manner. For these reasons, it is now well recognized that examining archaeological landscapes using remote sensing can complement traditional investigations. An analysis of remote sensing data can play an important role in (1) understanding spatial relationships between cultural materials and activities, (2) formulating archaeological sampling schemes, (3) measuring distances and spatial distributions of structures and monuments, and (4) evolving schemes for their conservation.

Keywords

Archaeology, Image Interpretation, Remote Sensing, Signatures.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Parcak, S., Satellite Remote Sensing for Archaeology. Routledge, 31 March 2009, 1st edn.

  • Wiseman, J. and El-Baz, F. (eds), Remote Sensing in Archaeology, Springer, New York, USA, 2007.

  • Lasaponara, R. and Masini, N. (eds). In Proceedings of the Workshop on Advances in Remote Sensing for Archaeology and Cultural Heritage Management. Rome, 2008.

  • Ebert, J. I. and Lyons, T. R., Manual of Remote Sensing (ed. Colwell, R. N.), American Society of Photogrammetry, Virginia, USA, 1983, 2nd edn.

  • Deuel, L., Flights into Yesterday: The Story of Aerial Archaeology, Pelican, Middlesex, England, 1969.

  • http://database.eohandbook.com/.

  • Gupta, E., Das, S. and Rajani, M. B., Archaeological exploration in Srirangapatna and its environ through remote sensing analysis. J. Indian Soc. Remote Sensing, 2016; doi:10.1007/s12524-017-0659-9.

  • Rajani, M. B. and Settar, S., Application of multispectral remote sensing imagery in detection of ancient forts in South India. In Space, Time, Place Third International Conference on Remote Sensing in Archaeology (eds Campana, S., Forte, M. and Liuzza, C.), Tiruchirappalli, Tamil Nadu, India, 17–21 August 2009, pp. 123–127, BAR–S2118,2010; ISBN 978 1 4073 0659 9.

  • Ghose, B., Kar, A. and Hussain, Z., The lost courses of the Sarasvati River in the Great Indian Desert: new evidence from the Landsat imagery. Geographical J., 1979, 145(3), 446e451.

  • Pal, Y., Baldev, S., Sood, R. K. and Agarwal, D. P., Remote sensing of the ‘lost’ Saraswati river. Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. (Earth Planet. Sci.), 1980, 89(3), 317e331.

  • Ramasamy, S. M., Bakliwal, P. C. and Verma, R. P., Remote sensing and river migration in Western India. Int. J. Remote Sensing, 1991, 12, 2597e2609.

  • Ben-Dor, E., Portugali, J., Kochavi, M., Shimoni, M. and Vinitzky, L., Airborne thermal video radiometry and excavation planning at Tel Leviah, Golan heights, Israel. J. Field Archaeol., 1999, 26(2), 117–127.

  • McCauley, J. F. et al., Palaeodrainages of the Eastern Sahara – the radar rivers revisited (SIR-A/B implications for a mid-Tertiary trans-African drainage system). IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sensing, 1986, GE-24(4), pp. 624–648.

  • McCauley, J. F. et al., Subsurface valley and geoarchaeology of Eastern Sahara revealed by Shuttle Radar. Science, 1982, 218, 1004–1019.

  • Rajani, M. B., Patra, S. K. and Verma, M., Space observation for generating 3D perspective views and its implication to the study of the archaeological site of Badami in India. J. Cult. Heritage, 10 (Suppl. 1), 2009, pp. e20–e26; doi:10.1016/j.culher.2009.08.003.

  • http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2013/06/hidden-city-angkor-wat (retrieved on 15 June 2017).

  • http://archive.archaeology.org/1007/etc/caracol.html (retrieved on 15 June 2017).

  • Prithviraj, M., Vijay, U. T. and Ajay Kumar, G. C., Geo-spatial data generation and terrestrial scanning for 3D Reconstruction. Int. J. Adv. Res. Comput. Commun. Eng., 2012, 1(9).

  • Holcomb, D. W. and Shingiray, I. L., Imaging radar in archaeological investigations: an image-processing perspective. Remote Sensing in Archaeology, Springer, New York, USA, 2007, pp. 11–45.

  • Rajani, M. B., Bhattacharya, S. and Rajawat, A. S., Synergistic application of optical and radar data for archaeological exploration in the Talakadu Region, Karnataka. J. Indian Soc. of Remote Sensing, 2011, pp. 519–527; doi:10.1007/s 12524-011-0102-6.

  • Kvammem, K. L., Integrating multiple geo-spatial datasets. Remote Sensing in Archaeology, Springer, New York, USA, 2007, pp. 329–374.

  • Devereux, B. J., Amable, G. S. and Crow, P., Visualisation of Li-DAR terrain models for archaeological feature detection. Antiquity, 82.316, 2008, pp. 470–479.

  • Navalgund, R. R., Remote Sensing: basics and applications. Resonance, 2001, 6, 51–60.

  • Navalgund, R. R., Remote Sensing 2: Sensors and Platforms. Resonance, 2002, 7, 37–46.

  • Joseph, G., Fundamentals of Remote Sensing, Universities Press, Hyderabad, 2003.

  • Siart, C., Eitel, B. and Panagiotopoulos, D., Investigation of past archaeological landscapes using remote sensing and GIS: a multi-method case study from Mount Ida, Crete. J. Archaeol. Sci., 2008, 35(11), 2918–2926.

  • De Laet, V., Paulissen, E. and Waelkens, M., Methods for the extraction of archaeological features from very high-resolution Ikonos-2 remote sensing imagery, Hisar (southwest Turkey). J. Archaeol. Sci., 2007, 34(5), 830–841.

  • Rajani, M. B. and Rajawat, A. S., Potential of satellite based sensors for studying distribution of archaeological sites along paleo channels: Harappan sites a case study. J. Archaeol. Sci., 2011, 38, 2010–2016.

  • Thakker, P. S., Locating potential archaeological sites in Gujarat using satellite data. NNRMS Bulletin, No. B-26, June 2001, p. 27.

  • Rajani, M. B. and Kasturirengan, K., Sea-level changes and its impact on coastal archaeological monuments: seven pagodas of Mahabalipuram, a case study. J. Indian Soc. Remote Sensing, 2012, doi:10.1007/s12524-012-0210-y.

  • Thakker, P. S., Locating potential archaeological sites in Gujarat using satellite data. NNRMS Bulletin, No. 26, Department of Space, Government of India, Bangalore, 2001.

  • Rajani, M. B., Bangalore from above and archaeological overview. Curr. Sci., 2007, 93(10), 1352–1353.

  • Rajani, M. B. and Kasturirangan, K., Multispectral remote sensing data analysis and application for detecting moats around medieval settlements in South India. J. Indian Society of Remote Sensing, doi:10.1007/s12524-013-0346-4.

  • Mohanty, R. K. and Smith, M. L., Excavations at Sisupalgarh, 2008. Man Environment, 2009, XXXIV(1), 47–56.

  • Takahashi, T. H., Yamaoka, T., Yoneda, F. and Uesugi, A., The ancient city of Sravasti: its significance on the urbanization of North India. Puratattva. Bull. Indian Archaeol. Soc., 1999-2000, 30, 74–92.

  • Rai, S. S., Application of integrated digital technologies in the study of settlement archaeology of Kausambi Region. In Space, Time, Place: Third International Conference on Remote Sensing in Archaeology (eds Campana, S., Forte, M. and Liuzza, C.), BAR International Series 2118, 2010, pp. 325–332.

  • http://www.wikiwand.com/en/Machilipatnam (accessed on 15 April 2017).

  • Rajani, M. B., Rajawat, A. S., Krishna Murthy, M. S., Kamini, J. and Rao, S., Demonstration of the synergy between multi-sensor satellite data, GIS and ground truth to explore the archaeological site in Talakadu region in South India. J. Geomatics, 2012, 6(1), 37–41.

  • Iyer, M., Nagendra, H. and Rajani, M. B., Using satellite imagery and historical maps to investigate the original contours of Lalbagh Botanical Garden. Curr. Sci., 2012, 102(3), 507–509.

  • Rajani, M. B., The expanse of archaeological remains at Nalanda: a study using remote sensing and GIS. Arch. Asian Art, 2016, 66(1), 1–23.

  • Bevan, B. W., Geophysical prospecting. Am. J. Archaeol., 1995, 99, 88–90.

  • Coningham, R. A. E., Schmidt, A. and Strickland, K. M. S., A pilot geophysical and auger core evaluation within the UNESCO World Heritage Site of Lumbini, Nepal. Ancient Nepal, 2011, 176, 9–24.


Abstract Views: 276

PDF Views: 105




  • The Science behind Archaeological Signatures from Space

Abstract Views: 276  |  PDF Views: 105

Authors

Ranganath Navalgund
Indian Space Research Organization Headquarters, Bengaluru 560 231, India
M. B. Rajani
National Institute of Advanced Studies, IISc Campus, Bengaluru 560 012, India

Abstract


Archaeology has traditionally focused on studying historic or prehistoric people and their cultures by analysis of their artefacts, inscriptions, monuments and other such material remains, especially those that have been documented from excavations. This focus is somewhat narrow, because it excludes many new methods that have emerged in the last few decades (described in detail by Prabhakar and Korisettar in this special section (page 1873)). One such novel method is to study large imprints on the landscape caused by human activity. These tell-tale features include soil marks, crop marks, drainage patterns, field boundaries and a host of man-made structures, whose study can provide additional cultural insights. In some cases, these features are difficult to detect by the naked eye at ground level, but are detectable by remote sensing techniques from aerial/space-based platforms in a non-destructive manner. For these reasons, it is now well recognized that examining archaeological landscapes using remote sensing can complement traditional investigations. An analysis of remote sensing data can play an important role in (1) understanding spatial relationships between cultural materials and activities, (2) formulating archaeological sampling schemes, (3) measuring distances and spatial distributions of structures and monuments, and (4) evolving schemes for their conservation.

Keywords


Archaeology, Image Interpretation, Remote Sensing, Signatures.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv113%2Fi10%2F1859-1872