Current Science

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Ecological Flow Requirement for Fishes of Godavari River:Flow Estimation Using the PHABSIM Method


Affiliations
1 Wildlife Institute of India, # 18, Chandrabani, Dehradun 248 001, India
2 Fisheries Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, V6T 1Z4, Canada
 

Fish habitat requirements are an essential aspect of the estimation of environmental flows. In India, a few studies have proposed environmental flows for the major rivers on the basis of qualitative observation or expert opinion. As part of a study regarding the effect of altered flow across the Godavari river on fishes, we estimated flow requirement of the fishes using a physical habitat simulation model (PHABSIM). This model uses habitat requirement of selected fish species in the form of habitat suitability curves (HSCs) against river habitat availability. We developed HSCs for five economically important fishes (Bangana dero, Cirrhinus cirrhosus, Labeo calbasu, Labeo fimbriatus and Wallago attu). These HSCs indicate that B. dero prefers high velocities (0.9–1.2 m/s) compared with the other species and that L. fimbriatus prefers deeper areas (1.2–1.5 m). C. cirrhosus uses low flows with moderate depth (0.3–0.6 m/s; 0.6–1.5 m). The HSCs were used in PHABSIM along with instream habitat data recorded from four cross-sections to predict the weighted usable areas (WUAs) of the fishes. The relationship between habitat area and discharge was used to predict the minimum acceptable flow for maintaining fish habitats. On the basis of the WUA–discharge relationship curve, 26% of the mean flow was recommended as the minimum ecological flow required below the Polavaram dam of Godavari river.

Keywords

Environmental Flow, Habitat Suitability Curves, Instream Flow Incremental Methodology, River Fishes.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Tharme, R. E., A global perspective on environmental flow assessment: emerging trends in the development and application of environmental flow methodologies for rivers. River Res. Appl., 2003, 19, 397–441; doi:10.1002/rra.736.

  • Gore, J. A., Layzer, J. B. and Mead, J., Macroinvertebrate instream flow studies after 20 years: a role in stream management and restoration. Regul. Rivers: Res. Manage., 2001, 17, 527–542; doi:10.1002/rrr.650.

  • Vishmara, R., Azzellinno, A., Bosi, R., Grosa, G. and Gentili, G., Habitat suitability curves for brown trout (Salmo trutta fario L.) in the river Adda, northern Italy: comparing univariate and multivariate approaches. Regul. Rivers: Res. Manage., 2001, 17, 37–50; doi:10.1002/1099-1646(200101/02)17:1<37::AID-RRR606>3.0.CO; 2-Q.

  • Jowett, I. G., Hayes, J. W. and Duncan, M. J., A Guide to Instream Habitat Survey Methods and Analysis, NIWA Science and Technology Series No. 5, New Zealand, 2008, p. 121.

  • Bovee, K. D., Lamb, B. L., Bartholow, J. M., Stalnaker, C. B., Taylor, J. and Henriksen, J., Stream habitat analysis using the instream flow incremental methodology. Biological Resources Division Information and Technology Report USGS/BRD-1998-0004, US Geological Survey, Washington, DC, USA, 1998, p. 159.

  • Annear, T. et al., Instream Flows for Riverine Resource Stewardship, Instream Flow Council, Cheyenne, WY, USA, 2004.

  • Conklin Jr, D. J., Canton, S. P., Chadwick, J. W. and Miller, W. J., Habitat suitability curves for selected fish species in the central Platte river, Nebraska. Rivers, 1996, 5(4), 250–266.

  • Reiser, D. W., Wesche, T. A. and Estes, C., Status of instream flow legislation and practices in North American fisheries. Fisheries, 1989, 14(2), 22–29.

  • Rosenfeld, J. S. and Plotemy, R., Modelling available habitat versus available energy flux: do PHABSIM applications that neglect prey abundance underestimate optional flows for juvenile salmonids? Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 2012, 69, 1920–1934; doi:10.1139/f2012-115.

  • Smakhtin, V. and Anputhas, M., An assessment of environmental flow requirements of Indian river basins. International Water Management Institute, Colombo, Sri Lanka, IWMI Research Report 107, 2006, p. 42.

  • Kumara, B. K. H., Srikantaswamy, S. and Bai, S., Environmental flows in Bhadra River, Karnataka, India. Int. J. Water Res. Environ. Eng., 2010, 2(7), 164–173.

  • Rajvanshi, A. et al., Assessment of cumulative impacts of hydroelectric projects on aquatic and terrestrial biodiversity in Alaknanda and Bhagirathi basins, Uttarakhand. Technical Report, Wildlife Institute of India, Dehradun, 2012.

  • Joshi, K. D., Jha, D. N., Alam, A., Srivastava, S. K., Vijay Kumar and Sharma, A. P., Environmental flow requirements of river Sone: impacts of low discharge on fisheries. Curr. Sci., 2014, 107(3), 478–488.

  • CWC, National register of dams in India. Central Water Commission, New Delhi, 2014; www.cwc.nic.in (accessed on 31 December 2014).

  • WRIS, Dams and barrages location map in India. Water Resource Information System of India, New Delhi, 2014; www.india-wris.nrsc.gov.in (accessed on 31 December 2014).

  • Bovee, K. D., A guide to stream habitat analysis using the instream flow incremental methodology. Instream Flow Information Paper 12, FWS/OBS-82/26, US Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington DC, USA, 1982, p. 248.

  • Sivakumar, K., Johnson, J. A., Gokulakkannan, N., Ray, P., Katlam, G. and Bagaria, P., Assessment of ecological settings and biodiversity values of Papikonda National Park and Indira Sagar (Polavaram) Multipurpose Project Impact Zone in Andhra Pradesh for development of mitigatory measures. Wildlife Institute of India, Dehradun, 2014, p. 159.

  • Bovee, K. D., Development and evaluation of habitat suitability criteria for use in the instream flow incremental methodology. Instream Flow Information No. 21, US Fish and Wildlife Service (Biological Report 87[7]), Washington, DC, USA, 1986, p. 231.

  • Jowett, I. G., Native fish and minimum flows in the Kakanui river. Conservation Advisory Science Notes No. 88, Department of Conservation, New Zealand, 1994, p. 288.

  • PHABSIM, Physical Habitat Stimulation Model for Windows. User’s Manual and Exercises, Midcontinent Ecological Science Center, US Geological Survey, Washington DC, USA, 2001.

  • Talwar, P. K. and Jhingran, A. G., Inland Fishes of India and Adjacent Countries, Oxford-IBH Publishing Co Pvt Ltd, New Delhi, 1991.

  • Jayaram, K. C. and Dhas, J. J., Revision of the genus Labeo from Indian region with a discussion on its phylogeny and zoogeography. ZSI, Occasional Paper No. 183, Zoological Survey of India, Kolkata, 2000.

  • Mishra, S. S., Acherjee, S. K. and Chakraborty, S. K., Development of tools for assessing conservation categories of siluroid fishes of fresh water and brackish water wetlands of south West Bengal, India. Environ. Biol. Fish, 2009, 84(4), 395–407; doi:10.1007/s10641-009-9448-9.

  • Ng, H. H., Wallago attu. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2014.3, 2010, www.iucnredlist.org (accessed on 15 December 2014).


Abstract Views: 370

PDF Views: 132




  • Ecological Flow Requirement for Fishes of Godavari River:Flow Estimation Using the PHABSIM Method

Abstract Views: 370  |  PDF Views: 132

Authors

J. A. Johnson
Wildlife Institute of India, # 18, Chandrabani, Dehradun 248 001, India
K. Sivakumar
Wildlife Institute of India, # 18, Chandrabani, Dehradun 248 001, India
Jordan Rosenfeld
Fisheries Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, V6T 1Z4, Canada

Abstract


Fish habitat requirements are an essential aspect of the estimation of environmental flows. In India, a few studies have proposed environmental flows for the major rivers on the basis of qualitative observation or expert opinion. As part of a study regarding the effect of altered flow across the Godavari river on fishes, we estimated flow requirement of the fishes using a physical habitat simulation model (PHABSIM). This model uses habitat requirement of selected fish species in the form of habitat suitability curves (HSCs) against river habitat availability. We developed HSCs for five economically important fishes (Bangana dero, Cirrhinus cirrhosus, Labeo calbasu, Labeo fimbriatus and Wallago attu). These HSCs indicate that B. dero prefers high velocities (0.9–1.2 m/s) compared with the other species and that L. fimbriatus prefers deeper areas (1.2–1.5 m). C. cirrhosus uses low flows with moderate depth (0.3–0.6 m/s; 0.6–1.5 m). The HSCs were used in PHABSIM along with instream habitat data recorded from four cross-sections to predict the weighted usable areas (WUAs) of the fishes. The relationship between habitat area and discharge was used to predict the minimum acceptable flow for maintaining fish habitats. On the basis of the WUA–discharge relationship curve, 26% of the mean flow was recommended as the minimum ecological flow required below the Polavaram dam of Godavari river.

Keywords


Environmental Flow, Habitat Suitability Curves, Instream Flow Incremental Methodology, River Fishes.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv113%2Fi11%2F2187-2193