Current Science

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Modelling Vadose Zone Processes for Assessing Groundwater Recharge in Semi-Arid Region


Affiliations
1 College of Agriculture, B. Gudi, University of Agricultural Science-Raichur, Raichur 585 287, India
2 Water Technology Centre, Indian Agricultural Research Institure, New Delhi 110 012, India
3 Rajmata Vijayaraje Scindia Krishi Vishwavidyalaya, Gwalior 474 002, India
 

Normally groundwater recharge is estimated using methods based on water balance, water table fluctuations, fixed factor of annual rainfall and tracer movement. In many of these methods water stored in the vadose zone and evapotranspiration are not accounted properly. These factors control groundwater recharge to a large extent, particularly in arid and semi-arid regions which are normally characterized by a deep water table, thick vadose zone and high evapotranspiration. In this study, HYDRUS-1D and MODFLOW models were used to assess the recharge flux and groundwater recharge in an area under a semi-arid region giving due consideration to important vadose zone processes. Cumulative recharge flux at water table in various sub-areas varied from 20.01 cm to 23.43 cm (29.26% to 34.26% of the monsoon rainfall). The average groundwater recharge was 22.2%. Total surface runoff in various sub-areas varied from 3.39 cm to 14.36 cm (5% to 21% of the monsoon rainfall). Evapotranspiration was found to be a major recharge controlling factor. Reference evapotranspiration varied from 37.19 cm to 45 cm (54% to 66% of the monsoon rainfall). Natural recharge under the prevailing pumping rate and pumping schedule was 23.3% of the monsoon rainfall. Simulation results revealed that if all the surface runoff is retained in the area, water table will rise by 1.46 m.

Keywords

Groundwater Recharge Modelling, HYDRUS and MODLFOW, Semi-Arid Region, Vadoze Zone Processes.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Scanlon, B. R. et al., Global synthesis of groundwater recharge in semiarid and arid regions. Hydrol. Process., 2006, 20, 3335–3370.

  • Theis, C. V., Amount of ground-water recharge in the Southern High Plains. In Proceedings of American Geophysical Union Trans 18th Annual Meeting, 1937, pp. 564–568.

  • Theis, C. V., Ground Water Note. American Society of Civil Engineers. Civil Engineering, 1940, pp. 277–280.

  • Sanford, W., Recharge and groundwater models: an overview. J. Hydrol., 2002, 10, 110–120.

  • Sophocleous, M., Groundwater recharge in groundwater. In Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS) (eds Silveira, L., Wohnlich, S. and Usunoff, E. J.), Developed under the Auspices of the UNESCO, Eolss Publishers, Oxford, UK, 2004; http://www.eolss.net

  • Keese, K. E., Scanlon, B. R. and Reedy, R. C., Assessing controls on diffuse groundwater recharge using unsaturated flow modelling. Water Resour. Res., 2005, 41, W06010, WR003841.

  • Lerner, D. N., Issar, A. S. and Simmers, I., Groundwater recharge: a guide to understanding and estimating natural recharge. Rep. 8. International Association of Hydrogeologists, Kenilworth, UK, 1990.

  • Cook, P. G. and Kitty, S., A helicopter-borne electromagnetic survey to delineate groundwater recharge rates. Water Resour. Res., 1992, 28, 2953–2961.

  • Rockhold, M. L., Fayer, M. J., Kincaid, C. T. and Gee, G. W., Estimation of natural groundwater recharge for the performance assessment of a low-level waste disposal facility at the Hanford site, Rep. PNL-10508, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington, 1995.

  • Kearns, A. K. and Hendrickx, J. M. H., Temporal variability of diffuse groundwater recharge in New Mexico, N.M. Water Resource Research Institute, Soccoro, Tech. Rep. No. 309, 1998, pp. 43.

  • Zomorodi, K., Evaluation of the response of a water table to a variable recharge rate. J. Hydrolog. Sci., 1991, 36, 67–78.

  • Allison, G. B., Gee, G. W. and Tyler, S. W., Vadose-zone techniques for estimating groundwater recharge in arid and semiarid regions. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 1994, 58, 6–14.

  • Twarakavi, N. K. C., Simunek, J. and Seo, S., Evaluating interactions between groundwater and Vadose zone using the HYDRUS-based flow package for MODFLOW. Vadose Zone J., 2008, 7, 757–768.

  • Scanlon, B. R., Healy, R. W. and Cook, P. G., Choosing appropriate techniques for quantifying groundwater recharge. Hydrogeol. J., 2002, 10, 18–39.

  • Gee, G. W. and Hillel, D., Groundwater recharge in arid regions: Review and critique of estimation methods. Hydrol. Process., 1988, 2, 255–266.

  • De Vries, J. J. and Simmers, I., Groundwater recharge: an overview of processes and challenges. J. Hydrol., 2002, 10, pp. 5–17.

  • Small, E. E., Climatic controls on diffuse groundwater recharge in semi-arid environments of the southwestern United States. Water Resour. Res., 2005, W04012; doi:10.1029/2004WR003193.

  • Nolan, B. T., Healy, R. W., Taber, P. E., Perkins, K., Hitt, K. J. and Wolock, D. M., Factors influencing ground-water recharge in the eastern United States, J. Hydrol., 2007, 332, 187–205; doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.06.029.

  • Rao, G. V. V. S., Groundwater recharge process and groundwater flow modelling: examples in granitic terrain. In Proceedings of 2nd International Conference on Hydrology and Watershed Management ‘Improving Water Productivity in the Agriculture’, organized by Centre for Water Resources, JNTU Institute of Science and Technology, JNTU, Hyderabad. Key Note Paper on Groundwater Recharge and Modeling, 2006, I, 485–503.

  • Feddes, R., Rooij, D. E. and Van Dam. J., Unsaturated zone modelling: progress, challenges and applications, V-6. Wageningen UR Frontis Series, 2004, pp. 179–208.

  • Ward, S., Recharge and groundwater models: An overview. Hydrogeol. J., 2002, 10, 110–120.

  • Seo, H. S., Simunek, J. and Poeter, E. P., Documentation of the HYDRUS package for MODFLOW-2000, the U.S. Geological Survey modular ground-water model. GWMI 2007-01. International Ground Water Modelling Centre, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, 2007.

  • Harbaugh, A. W., Banta, E. R., Hill, M. C. and McDonald, M. G., MODFLOW-2000, the US Geological Survey modular groundwater model user guide to modularization concepts and the ground-water flow process. USGS, Denver, CO, 2000.

  • Anuraga, T. S., Ruiz, L., Mohankumar, M. S., Sekhar, M. and Leijnse, A., Estimating groundwater recharge using land use and soil data: a case study in south India. Agric. Water Manage., 2006, 84, 65–76.

  • G. E. C., Ground Water Estimation Methodology. Report of the Ground Water Estimation Committee, Ministry of Irrigation, Government of India, New Delhi, 1982, p. 39.

  • G. E. C., Groundwater Resource Estimation Methodology. Report of the Groundwater Resource Estimation Committee, Ministry of Water Resources, Government of India, New Delhi, 1997, p. 100.

  • Kinzelbach, W. et al., A survey of methods for groundwater recharge in arid and semi-arid regions. Early Warning and Assessment Report Series, UNEP/DEWA/RS.02-2. United Nations Environment Programme, Nairobi, Kenya, 2002.

  • van Genuchten, M. Th., A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 1980, 44, 892–898.

  • Mualem, Y., A new model predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated porous media. Water Resour. Res., 1976, 12, 513–522.

  • Simunek, J. and Bradford, S. A., Vadose zone modelling: introduction and importance. Vadose Zone J., 2008, 7, 581–586.

  • McDonald, M. G. and Harbaugh, A. W., MODFLOW, A modular three-dimensional finite difference ground-water flow model, US Geological Survey, Open-file report Chapter A1, 1988, pp. 83–875.

  • Vetterlein, E., Bodenphysikalische Kennwerte fur SubstratHorizont-Gruppen. In Bodenwasserregulierung (ed. Koepke, V.), Muncheberg, Germany, 1989.

  • INSTAAR, University of Colorado, 1 June 2009; http://instaar.colorado.edu/deltaforce

  • Khalil Ajdary., Singh, D. K., Singh, A. K. and Manoj Khanna, Modelling of nitrogen leaching from experimental onion field under drip fertigation. Agric. Water Manag., 2007, 89, 15–28.

  • Feike, J. leij W., Russell, B. and Scott, M. L., Closed form expressions for water retention and conductivity data. Ground Water, 1997, 35(5), 848–858.

  • Sukhija, B. S., Reddy, D. V. and Nagabhushanam, P., Groundwater recharge in semi-arid regions of India: an overview of results obtained using tracers. Hydrogeology J., 1996, 4(3), 50–71.

  • Rangarajan, R. and Athavale, R. N., Annual replenishable ground water potential of India–an estimate based on injected tritium studies. J. Hydrol., 2000, 234, 35–83.

  • Narasimha Reddy, T. et al., Water balance model and groundwater flow model in Dulapally basin, AP, GWD, A.P. Tech. Rep. Res. Series No. 9, 1991, p. 85.

  • Sukhija, B. S. and Rao, A. A., Environmental tritium and radiocarbon studies in the Vedavati River Basin, Karnataka and Andhra Pradesh, India. J. Hydrol., 1983, 60, 185–196.

  • Scanlon, B. R., Mukherjee, A., Gates, J., Reedy, R. C. and Sinha, A. K., Groundwater recharge in natural dune systems and agricultural ecosystems in the Thar Desert region, Rajasthan, India. Hydrogeol. J., 2010; doi:10.1007/s10040-009-0555-7.

  • Shivanna, K., Kulkarni, U. P., Joseph, T. B. and Navada, S. V., Contribution of storm to groundwater in semi-arid regions of Karnataka, India. Hydrol. Proc., 2004, 18, 473–485.


Abstract Views: 381

PDF Views: 113




  • Modelling Vadose Zone Processes for Assessing Groundwater Recharge in Semi-Arid Region

Abstract Views: 381  |  PDF Views: 113

Authors

A. T. Dandekar
College of Agriculture, B. Gudi, University of Agricultural Science-Raichur, Raichur 585 287, India
D. K. Singh
Water Technology Centre, Indian Agricultural Research Institure, New Delhi 110 012, India
A. Sarangi
Water Technology Centre, Indian Agricultural Research Institure, New Delhi 110 012, India
A. K. Singh
Rajmata Vijayaraje Scindia Krishi Vishwavidyalaya, Gwalior 474 002, India

Abstract


Normally groundwater recharge is estimated using methods based on water balance, water table fluctuations, fixed factor of annual rainfall and tracer movement. In many of these methods water stored in the vadose zone and evapotranspiration are not accounted properly. These factors control groundwater recharge to a large extent, particularly in arid and semi-arid regions which are normally characterized by a deep water table, thick vadose zone and high evapotranspiration. In this study, HYDRUS-1D and MODFLOW models were used to assess the recharge flux and groundwater recharge in an area under a semi-arid region giving due consideration to important vadose zone processes. Cumulative recharge flux at water table in various sub-areas varied from 20.01 cm to 23.43 cm (29.26% to 34.26% of the monsoon rainfall). The average groundwater recharge was 22.2%. Total surface runoff in various sub-areas varied from 3.39 cm to 14.36 cm (5% to 21% of the monsoon rainfall). Evapotranspiration was found to be a major recharge controlling factor. Reference evapotranspiration varied from 37.19 cm to 45 cm (54% to 66% of the monsoon rainfall). Natural recharge under the prevailing pumping rate and pumping schedule was 23.3% of the monsoon rainfall. Simulation results revealed that if all the surface runoff is retained in the area, water table will rise by 1.46 m.

Keywords


Groundwater Recharge Modelling, HYDRUS and MODLFOW, Semi-Arid Region, Vadoze Zone Processes.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv114%2Fi03%2F608-618