Current Science

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Alaskan-Type Mafic–Ultramafic Complex at Padhar, Betul Belt, Central India


Affiliations
1 Geological Survey of India, Central Region, Nagpur 440 006, India
2 Geological Survey of India, Southern Region, Hyderabad 500 068, India
3 Geological Survey of India, National Center of Excellence in Geoscience Research, Kolkata 700 016, India
4 Geological Survey of India, National Center of Excellence in Geoscience Research, Bengaluru 560 078, India
 

We report here an Alaskan-type mafic–ultramafic complex at Padhar from the Precambrian Betul Belt of Central India. The Padhar intrusive bodies show lithological zoning defined by olivine-bearing ultramafic rocks in the core and gabbroic rocks at the margins, and are commonly accompanied by Cr–Cu–Ni sulphide mineralization. Mineral chemistry and whole-rock geochemistry of these rocks indicate that they are derived from the crystallization of hydrous magmas. The Padhar complex is characterized by high Mg and low abundance of incompatible trace elements. Flat REE pattern with negative Nb anomaly suggests arcmagmatism typical of Ural–Alaskan type. Presence of Mg-rich clinopyroxene and hornblende-rich rock types in the Padhar mafic–ultramafic intrusives along with paucity of orthopyroxenes in them further distinguish its from different types of complexes, i.e. ophiolite, Alpine and stratiform layered-type. These features are akin to Alaskan-type rocks as seen in Alaska, Canada and Urals of Russia. This finding of Alaskan-type ultramafic complex in the Padhar area of Betul Belt, Madhya Pradesh, is significant and has important implications in the tectonics and geodynamics of the Central Indian Tectonic Zone in general, and in the search of platinum group of minerals in particular.

Keywords

CITZ, Mafic–Ultramafic Complex, Hydrous Magmas, Intrusive Bodies, Lithological Zoning.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Eyuboglu, Y., Dilek, Y., Bozkurt, E., Bektas, O., Rojay, B. and Sen, C., Structure and geochemistry of an Alaskan-type ultramafic– mafic complex in the Eastern Pontides, NE Turkey. Gondwana Res., 2010, 18, 230–252.

  • Himmelberg, G. R. and Loney, R. A., Characteristics and petrogenesis of Alaskan-type ultramafic–mafic intrusions, Southeastern Alaska. US Geological Survey Professional Paper, 1995, p. 47.

  • Irvine, T. N., Petrology of the Duke Island ultramafic complex, Southeastern Alaska. Geol. Soc. Am. Mem., 1974, 138, 240.

  • Noble Jr, J. A. and Taylor, H. P., Correlation of the ultramafic complexes of southeastern Alaska with those of other parts of North America and the world. In Petrographic Provinces, Igneous and Metamorphic Rocks. Report of the 21st International Geological Congress, Part 13, Copenhagen, 1960, pp. 188–197.

  • Helmy, H. M. and El Mahallawi, M. M., Gabro Akarem mafic–ultramafic complex, Eastern Desert, Egypt: a late Precambrian analogue of Alaskan-type complexes. Mineral. Petrol., 2003, 77(1–2), 85–108.

  • Nixon, G. T., Cabri, L. J. and Laflamme, J. H. G., Platinum-group element mineralization in lode and placer deposits associated with the Tulameen Alaskan type complex, British Columbia. Can. Mineral., 1990, 28, 503–535.

  • Murray, C. G., Zoned ultramafic complexes of the Alaskan-type: feeder pipes of andesitic volcanoes. Mem. Geol. Soc. Am., 1972, 132, 313–335.

  • Johan, Z., Ohnenstetter, M., Slansky, E., Barron, L. M. and Suppel, D., Platinum mineralization in the Alaskan-type intrusive complexes near field, New South Wales, Australia. Part 1. Platinum group minerals in clinopyroxenites of the Kelvin Grove Prospect, Owendale intrusion. Mineral. Petrol., 1989, 40, 289–309.

  • Spandler, C. J., Arculus, R. J., Eggins, S. M., Mavrogenes, J. A., Price, R. C. and Reay, A. J., Petrogenesis of the Greenhills Complex, Southland, New Zealand: magmatic differentiation and cumulate formation at the ischolar_mains of a Permian island-arc volcano. Contrib. Mineral. Petrol., 2003, 144, 703–721.

  • Taylor Jr, H. P., The zoned ultramaphic complexes of southern Alaska. In Ultramafic and Related Rocks (ed. Wyllie, P. J.), John Wiley, New York, 1967, pp. 97–121.

  • Batanova, V. G. and Astrakhantsev, O. V., Tectonic position and origins of the zoned mafic–ultramafic plutons in the Northern Olyutor Zone, Koryak Highlands. Geotectonics, 1992, 26(2), 153–165.

  • Su, B.-X. et al., Petrological, geochemical and geochronological constraints on the origin of the Xiadong Ural–Alaskan type complex in NW China and tectonic implication for the evolution of southern Central Asian Orogenic Belt. Lithos, 2014, 201, 226–240.

  • Pittigrew, N. T. and Hattori, K. H., The Quetico intrusions of Western Superior Province: Neo-Archean examples of Alaskan/Ural-typemafic–ultramafic intrusions. Precambrian Res., 2006, 149, 21–42.

  • Roy, A., Chore, S. A., Viswakarma, L. L. and Chakraborthy, K., Geology and perochemistry of Padhar mafic–ultramafic complexes from Betul Belt: a study on arc type magmatism in central Indian Tectonic zone. Geol. Surv. India, Spec. Publ., 2004, 84, 297–318.

  • Subba Rao, D. V., Satyanarayanan, M., Srinivasa Sarma, D., Subramanyam, K. S. V., Venkateswarlu, K. and Hanuma Prasad, M., Geochemistry of the unusual mafic intrusions in Betul Fold Belt, Central India: implications for Ni–Cu–Au–PGE metallogeny. Curr. Sci., 2015, 108(4), 713–722.

  • Mondal, A. and Ray, A., Petrological and geochemical studies of ultramafic–mafic rocks from the North Puruliya Shear Zone (eastern India). J. Earth Syst. Sci., 2015, 124, 1781–1799.

  • Deng, Y., Yuan, F., Zhou, T., Xu, C., Zhang, D. and Guo, X., Geochemical characteristics and tectonic setting of the Tuerkubantao mafic-ultramafic intrusion in West Junggar, Xinjiang, China. Geosci. Front., 2015, 6, 141–152.

  • Roy, A. and Prasad, H. M., Tectonothermal events in Central Indian Tectonic Zone (CITZ) and its implication in Rhodinian crustal assembly. J. Asian Earth. Sci., 2003, 22, 115–129.

  • Chaturvedi, R. K., A review of the geology, tectonic features and tectono-lithostratigraphy of Betul Belt. Geol. Surv. India, Spec. Publ., 2001, 64, 299–315.

  • Chakrabarty, K. and Roy, A., Mesoproterozoic differential metasomatism in subcontinental lithospheric mantle of Central Indian tectonic zone: evidence from major and trace element geochemistry of Padhar Mafic–Ultramafic complex. J. Geol. Soc. India, 2012, 80, 628–640.

  • Snoke, A. W., Quick, J. E. and Bowman, H. R., Bear Mountain igneous complex, Klamath Mountains, California: an ultrabasic to silicic calc-alkaline suite. J. Petrol., 1981, 22, 501–552.

  • Farahat, E. S., Helmy, H. M. and Abu Hamamid, Neoproterozic Alaskan-type complex, South Eastern Desert, Egypt. J. Afr. Earth Sci., 2006, 45, 187–197.

  • Barnes, S. J. and Roeder, P. L., The range of spinel compositions in terresterial mafic and ultramafic rocks. J. Petrol., 2001, 42, 2279–2302.

  • Burg, J. P. et al., Translithospheric mantle diapirism: geological evidence and numerical modelling of the Kondyor zoned ultramafic complex (Russian Far-East). J. Petrol., 2009, 50, 289–321.

  • Brugmann, G. E., Reischmann, T., Naldrett, A. J. and Sutcliffe, R. H., Roots of an Archean volcanic arc complex: the Lac des IIes area in Ontario, Canada. Precamb. Res., 1997, 81, 223–239.

  • Ishiwatari, A. and Ichiyama, Y., Alaskan-type plutons and ultramafic lavas in Far East Russia, Northeast China, and Japan. Int. Geol. Rev., 2004, 46, 316–331.

  • Batanova, V. G., Pertsev, A. N., Kamenetsky, V. S., Ariskin, A. A., Mochalov, A. G. and Sobolev, A. V., Crustal evolution of island arc ultramafic magma: Galmoenan pyroxenites–dunite plutonic complex, Koryak Highland (Far East Russia). J. Petrol., 2005, 46, 1345–1366.

  • Cabri, L. J., Harris, D. C. and Weizer, T. W., Mineralogy and distribution of platinum-group mineral placer deposits of the world. Exp. Mining Geol., 1996, 5, 73–167.

  • Thakurta, J., Ripley, E. M. and Li, C. S., Geochemical constraints on the origin of sulfide mineralization in the Duke Island complex, southeastern Alaska. Geochem., Geophys., Geosyst., 2008, Q07003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2008GC001982.

  • Maier, W. D., Barnes, S. J., Chinyepi, G., Barton, J. J., Eglington, B. and Setshedi, T., The composition of magmatic Ni–Cu–(PGE) sulfide deposits in the Tati and Selebi–Phikwe belts of eastern Botswana, Mineralium Deposita, 2008, 43, 37–60.

  • Ripley, E. M., Magmatic sulfide mineralization in Alaskan-type complexes. In New Development in Magmatic Ni–Cu and PGE Deposits (eds Li, C. S. and Ripley, E. M.), Geological Publishing House, Beijing, 2009, pp. 219–228.

  • Dora, M. L., Final PGE report of Gondpipri area, GSI Report, 2012; gsi.gov.in.

  • Conrad, W. K. and Kay, R. W., Ultramafic and mafic inclusions from Adak Island: crystallization history, and implications for the nature of primary magmas and crustal evolution in the Aleutian Arc. J. Petrol., 1984, 25, 88–125.

  • Leake, B. E. et al., Nomenclature of the amphiboles: report of the Subcommittee on Amphiboles of the International Mineralogical Association, Commission on New Minerals and Mineral Names. Am. Mineral., 1997, 82, 1019–1037.

  • Jan, M. Q. and Windley, B. F., Cr-spinel-silicate chemistry in ultrmafic rocks of the Jijal Complex, NW Pakistan. J. Petrol., 1990, 31, 667–715.

  • Nakamura, N., Determination of REE, Ba, Fe, Mg, Na and K in carbonaceous and ordinary chondrites. Geochim. Cosmachim. Acta, 1974, 38, 757–775.

  • Vijaya Kumar, K., Rathna, K. and Leelanandam, C., Proterozoic subduction-related and continental rift-zone mafic magmas from the Eastern Ghats Belt, SE India: geochemical characteristics and mantle sources. Curr. Sci., 2015, 108(2), 184–197.


Abstract Views: 369

PDF Views: 127




  • Alaskan-Type Mafic–Ultramafic Complex at Padhar, Betul Belt, Central India

Abstract Views: 369  |  PDF Views: 127

Authors

R. R. Meshram
Geological Survey of India, Central Region, Nagpur 440 006, India
N. K. Rao
Geological Survey of India, Central Region, Nagpur 440 006, India
S. Chore
Geological Survey of India, Southern Region, Hyderabad 500 068, India
M. L. Dora
Geological Survey of India, Central Region, Nagpur 440 006, India
S. Shome
Geological Survey of India, National Center of Excellence in Geoscience Research, Kolkata 700 016, India
M. Shareef
Geological Survey of India, National Center of Excellence in Geoscience Research, Bengaluru 560 078, India
M. Korakoppa
Geological Survey of India, National Center of Excellence in Geoscience Research, Bengaluru 560 078, India

Abstract


We report here an Alaskan-type mafic–ultramafic complex at Padhar from the Precambrian Betul Belt of Central India. The Padhar intrusive bodies show lithological zoning defined by olivine-bearing ultramafic rocks in the core and gabbroic rocks at the margins, and are commonly accompanied by Cr–Cu–Ni sulphide mineralization. Mineral chemistry and whole-rock geochemistry of these rocks indicate that they are derived from the crystallization of hydrous magmas. The Padhar complex is characterized by high Mg and low abundance of incompatible trace elements. Flat REE pattern with negative Nb anomaly suggests arcmagmatism typical of Ural–Alaskan type. Presence of Mg-rich clinopyroxene and hornblende-rich rock types in the Padhar mafic–ultramafic intrusives along with paucity of orthopyroxenes in them further distinguish its from different types of complexes, i.e. ophiolite, Alpine and stratiform layered-type. These features are akin to Alaskan-type rocks as seen in Alaska, Canada and Urals of Russia. This finding of Alaskan-type ultramafic complex in the Padhar area of Betul Belt, Madhya Pradesh, is significant and has important implications in the tectonics and geodynamics of the Central Indian Tectonic Zone in general, and in the search of platinum group of minerals in particular.

Keywords


CITZ, Mafic–Ultramafic Complex, Hydrous Magmas, Intrusive Bodies, Lithological Zoning.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv114%2Fi03%2F671-678