Current Science

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Triple-Blind Review is the Way to Go


Affiliations
1 Physical and Geological Sciences Programme, Universiti Brunei Darussalam, Brunei Darussalam, BE1410, Tanzania, United Republic of
 

Authors submit a research article to a standard journal with a view that it will be properly reviewed and considered on merit. However, there are many cases where editors and reviewers have rejected papers totally based on bias. The ischolar_mains of this problem are suggested to lie in editorial process, and thus double-blind review process was suggested, and subsequently adapted by many journals.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Editorial, Nature Geosci., 2013, 6, 413.

  • Editorial, Nature Geosci., 2012, 5, 585.

  • Moss-Racusin, C. A. et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2012, 109, 16474–16479.

  • Weller, A. C., Ser. Rev., 1995, 21(1), 53–65.

  • Elisa De Ranieril et al., In Eighth International Congress on Peer Review and Scientific Publications, Chicago, USA, 10–11 September 2017; https://peerreviewcongress.org/program-information


Abstract Views: 384

PDF Views: 127




  • Triple-Blind Review is the Way to Go

Abstract Views: 384  |  PDF Views: 127

Authors

A. A. Shah
Physical and Geological Sciences Programme, Universiti Brunei Darussalam, Brunei Darussalam, BE1410, Tanzania, United Republic of

Abstract


Authors submit a research article to a standard journal with a view that it will be properly reviewed and considered on merit. However, there are many cases where editors and reviewers have rejected papers totally based on bias. The ischolar_mains of this problem are suggested to lie in editorial process, and thus double-blind review process was suggested, and subsequently adapted by many journals.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv114%2Fi04%2F712-712