Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Electrical Conductance Map for Saurashtra Region, Gujarat, India


Affiliations
1 Indian Institute of Geomagnetism, Panvel, Navi Mumbai 410 218, India
 

In the present study, we have deployed 35 fluxgate magnetometers and 20 long-period magnetotelluric sites to derive the electrical conductivity distribution of Saurashtra region, Gujarat, India. Geomagnetic field variations (X-north–south, Y-east–west and Z-vertically downward components) recorded at the above sites are investigated to obtain single-station vertical field transfer functions. Maps of induction arrows suggest that the offshore basins are more conducting than inland basins of the region. Thin sheet modelling of the induction features suggests that the anomalous behaviour is strongly influenced by the offshore and shelf edge sedimentary basins that contain thick depo centres of Mesozoic sediments. Jamnagar, Ulva and Mesozoic sedimentary basins on land are also reflected as high conductivity anomalies that could be related to the presence of carbonate/shale sediments. Release of carbon (in the form of thin films) due to thermal activity of Reunion hotspot on carbonate rich sediments may give rise to high conductivity anomalies.

Keywords

Carbon Films, Induction Arrows, Thermal Activity, Thin Sheet Modelling.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Storey, M., Mahoney, J. J., Saunders, A. D., Duncan, R. A., Kelley, S. P. and Coffin, M. F., Timing of hot spot related volcanism and the breakup of Madagascar from India. Science, 1995, 267, 852–855.
  • Morgan, W. J., Plate motions and deep mantle convection. Mem. Geol. Soc. Am., 1972, 132,7–22.
  • White, R. S. and McKenzie, D., Magmatism at rift zones: the generation of volcanic continental margins and flood basalts. J. Geophys. Res., 1989, 94, 7685–7729.
  • White, R. S. and McKenzie, D., Mantle plumes and flood basalts. J. Geophys. Res., 1995, 100, 17543–17585.
  • Biswas, S. K., Regional tectonic framework, structure and evolution of the western marginal basins of India. Tectonophysics, 1987, 135, 307–327.
  • Radhakrishana, M., Verma, R. K. and Purushotham, A. K., Lithospheric structure below the eastern Arabian Sea and adjoining west coast of India based on intergrated analysis of gravity and seismic data. Mar. Geophys. Res., 2002, 23, 25–42.
  • Rao, G. S. P. and Tewari, H. C., The seismic structure of the Saurashtra crust in NW India and its relationship to Reunion hotspot. Geophys. J. Int., 2005, 160, 318–330.
  • Tewari, H. C., Surya Prakasa Rao, G. and Rajendra Prasad, B., Uplifted crust in parts of western India. J. Geol. Soc. India, 2009, 73, 479–488.
  • Chopra, S. et al., Crustal structure of the Gujarat region, India: new constraints from the analysis of teleseismic receiver functions. J. Asian Earth Sci., 2014, 96, 237–254.
  • Kennett, B. L. N. and Widiyantoro, S., A low seismic wave speed anomaly beneath North Western India: a seismic structure of Deccan hotspot? Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 1999, 165, 145–155.
  • Mohan, G., Ravi Kumar, M., Saikia, D., Praveen Kumar, K. A., Tiwari, P. Kr. and Surve, G., Imprints of volcanism in the upper mantle beneath NW Deccan volcanic Province. Lithosphere, 2012, 4, 150–159.
  • Madhusudhan Rao, K., Ravi Kumar, M., Rastogi, B. K., Crust beneath the northwestern Deccan Volcanic Province, India: evidence for uplift and magmatic underplating. J. Geophys. Res., 2015, 120, 3385–3405.
  • Sarma, S. V. S., Patro, B. P. K., Harinarayana, T., Veeraswamy, K., Sastry, R. S. and Sarma, M. V. C., A magnetotelluric (MT) study across the Koyna seismic zone, western India: evidence for block structure. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 2004, 142, 23–36.
  • Patro, P. K. et al., Sub-basalt sediment imaging – the efficacy of magnetotellurics. J. Appl. Geophys., 2015, 121, 106–115.
  • Schmucker, U., Anomalies of geomagnetic variations in the southwestern United States. Bull. Scripps Inst. Oceanogr., 1970, 13, 1–165.
  • Beamish, D., The mapping of induced currents around the Kenyarift: comparison techniques. Geophys. J. R. Astron. Soc., 1977, 50, 311–322.
  • Arora, B. R., Rigoti, A., Vitorello, I., Padhila, A. L., Trivedi, N. B. and Chamalaun, F. H., Electrical imaging of the intracratonic Parnaiba basin, North–Northeast Brazil. J. Geomagn. Geoelectr., 1997, 49, 1631–1648.
  • Arora, B. R. and Subba Rao, P. B. V., Integrated modeling of EM response functions from peninsular India and Bay of Bengal. Earth Planets Space, 2002, 54, 637–654.
  • Subba Rao, P. B. V., Singh, A. K. and Rao, C. K., Regional conductance map of Saurashtra and surrounding regions. Curr. Sci., 2012, 103(2), 187.
  • Egbert, G. D. and Booker, J. R., Imaging crustal structure in southwestern Washington with small magnetometer arrays. J. Geophys. Res., 1993, 98, 15967–15985.
  • Lilley, F. E. M. and Arora, B. R., The sign convention for quadrature Parkinson arrows in geomagnetic induction studies. Rev. Geophys., 1982, 20, 513–518.
  • Subba Rao, P. B. V., Arora, B. R. and Singh, A. K., Electrical conductance map for the Kachchh rift basin: constraint on tectonic evolution and seismotetonic implications. Pure Appl. Geophys., 2014, 171, 2353–2370.
  • Jones, A. G., The problem of current channeling: critical review. Geophys. Surv., 1983, 6, 79–122.
  • Arora, B. R. and Adam, A., Anomalous directional behaviour of induction arrows above elongated conductive structures and its possible causes. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 1992, 74, 183–190.
  • Bailey, R. C., Edwards, G. D., Garland, G. D., Kurtz, R. and Pitcher, D., Electrical conductivity studies over a tectonically active area in eastern Canada. J. Geomagn. Geoelectr., 1974, 26, 125–146.
  • Kaila, K. L., Tewari, H. C., Krishna, V. G., Dixit, M. M., Sarkar, D. and Reddy, M. S., Deep seismic sounding studies in the north Cambay and Sanchor basin, India. Geophys. J. Int., 1990, 103, 621–637.
  • Dixit, M. M., Tewari, H. C. and Visweswara Rao, C., Two-dimensional velocity model of the crust beneath the South Cambay Basin, India from refraction and wideangle reflection data. Geophys. J. Int., 2010, 181, 635–652.
  • Vasseur, G. and Weidelt, P., Bimodel electromagnetic induction in non-uniform thin sheets with an application to the northern Pyrenean induction anomaly. Geophys. J. R. Astron. Soc., 1977, 51, 669–690.
  • Vijaya Kumar, P. V., Subba Rao, P. B. V., Rao, C. K., Singh, A. K. and Rama Rao, P., Frequency characteristics of geomagnetic induction anomaliesin Saurashtra Region. J. Earth Sci. Syst. 2017, 101; doi:10.1007/s12040-017-0872-5.
  • Mareschal, M., Vasseur, G., Srivastava, B. J. and Singh, R. N., Induction models of southern India and effect of offshore geology. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 1987, 45, 137–148.
  • Sharma, K., Nilesh, B., Shukla, A. D., Cheong, D. K. and Singhvi, A. K., Optical dating of late Quaternary carbonate sequence of Saurashtra, western India. Quaternary Res., 2017, 87, 133–150.
  • Dwivedi, A. K., Petroleum exploration in India – a perspective and endeavours. Proc. Indian Natl. Sci. Acad., 2016, 82, 881–903.
  • Duba, A., Huenges, E., Nover, G. and Will, G., Impedance of black shale from the Munster land I borehole: an anomalously good conductor. Geophys. J. Int., 1988, 94, 413–419.
  • Chamyal, L. S., Maurya, D. M. and Rachna Raj, Fluvial systems of the drylands of western India: a synthesis of Late Quaternary environmental and tectonic changes. Quaternary Int., 2003, 104, 69–86.
  • Singh, S. B. et al., Delineation of basaltic covered sediments in the Saurashtra region using deep resistivity sounding studies. In Fifth Conference and Exposition on Petroleum Geophysics, Hyderabad, 2004, 69–74.
  • Chandrasekhar, D. V., Mishra, D. C., Rao, G. P. and Rao, J. M., Gravity and magnetic signatures of volcanic plugs related to Deccan volcanism in Saurashtra, India and their physical and geo-chemical properties. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 2002, 201, 277–292.
  • Arora, B. R. and Reddy, C. D., Magnetovariational study over a seismically active area in the Deccan trap province of western India. Phys. Earth Planet. Int., 1991, 66, 118–131.
  • Merh, S. S., Geology of Gujarat, Geological Society of India Publication, Bangalore, 1995, pp. 1–222.
  • Biswas, S. K., A review of structure and tectonics of Kutch basin, western India, with special reference to earthquakes. Curr. Sci., 2005, 88, 1592–1600.
  • Bhattacharya, G. C. and Subramanyam, V., Extension of the Narmada–Son lineament on the continental margin off Saurashtra, western India as obtained from magnetic measurements. Marine Geophys. Res., 1986, 8, 329–344.

Abstract Views: 412

PDF Views: 126




  • Electrical Conductance Map for Saurashtra Region, Gujarat, India

Abstract Views: 412  |  PDF Views: 126

Authors

P. V. Vijaya Kumar
Indian Institute of Geomagnetism, Panvel, Navi Mumbai 410 218, India
P. B. V. Subba Rao
Indian Institute of Geomagnetism, Panvel, Navi Mumbai 410 218, India
A. K. Singh
Indian Institute of Geomagnetism, Panvel, Navi Mumbai 410 218, India
C. K. Rao
Indian Institute of Geomagnetism, Panvel, Navi Mumbai 410 218, India

Abstract


In the present study, we have deployed 35 fluxgate magnetometers and 20 long-period magnetotelluric sites to derive the electrical conductivity distribution of Saurashtra region, Gujarat, India. Geomagnetic field variations (X-north–south, Y-east–west and Z-vertically downward components) recorded at the above sites are investigated to obtain single-station vertical field transfer functions. Maps of induction arrows suggest that the offshore basins are more conducting than inland basins of the region. Thin sheet modelling of the induction features suggests that the anomalous behaviour is strongly influenced by the offshore and shelf edge sedimentary basins that contain thick depo centres of Mesozoic sediments. Jamnagar, Ulva and Mesozoic sedimentary basins on land are also reflected as high conductivity anomalies that could be related to the presence of carbonate/shale sediments. Release of carbon (in the form of thin films) due to thermal activity of Reunion hotspot on carbonate rich sediments may give rise to high conductivity anomalies.

Keywords


Carbon Films, Induction Arrows, Thermal Activity, Thin Sheet Modelling.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv114%2Fi10%2F2175-2181