Current Science

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Multidisciplinary Approach to Teaching Inorganic Chemistry in High School:An Example of The Topic of Metals


Affiliations
1 Department of Chemistry, University of Nis, Visegradska 33, 18000 Nis, Serbia
2 Gymnasium Stevan Sremac, Street Vozda Karadorda 27, 18000 Nis, Serbia
 

We present in this article a multidisciplinary approach to teaching high-school chemistry in Serbia, illustrated by an example of the course topic of metals. The aim is to increase the level of interest in studying chemistry and acquiring knowledge that is applicable in daily life. The experiment was carried out in four classes of second-year gymnasium students. The redesigned materials can serve as a model for the preparation of similar materials for other course topics. Multidisciplinary approach in processing of the lesson on metals and the redesigned curriculum content significantly increased the interest of the students and improved their knowledge.

Keywords

Inorganic Chemistry, High School, Multidisciplinary Approach, Teaching, Metals.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Gilbert, J. K. and Treagust, D., Multiple Representations in Chemical Education, Springer, 2009.

  • Johnstone, A. H., Why is science difficult to learn? Things are seldom what they seem. J. Com. Ass. Learn., 1991, 7, 75–83.

  • Gabel, D., The complexity of chemistry and implications for teaching. In International Handbook of Science Education (eds Fraser, B. J. and Tobin, K. G.), Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1998, pp. 233–248.

  • Harrison, A. G. and Treagust, D. F., Learning about atoms, molecules, and chemical bonds: a case study of multiple-model use in grade 11 chemistry. Sci. Educ., 2000, 84, 352–381.

  • Ebenezer, J., A hypermedia environment to explore and negotiate students’ conceptions: animation of the solution process of table salt. J. Sci. Educ Technol., 2001, 10(1), 73–92.

  • Ravialo, A., Assessing students’ conceptual understanding of solubility equilibrium. J. Chem. Educ., 2001, 78(5), 629–631.

  • Treagust, D. F., Chittleborough, G. D. and Mamiala, T. L., The role of sub-microscopic and symbolic representations in chemical explanations. Int. J. Sci. Educ., 2003, 25, 1353–1369.

  • Taber, K. S., Challenging misconceptions in the chemistry classroom: resources to support teachers. Educ. Quím., 2009, 4, 13–20.

  • Zoller, U., Students’ misunderstandings and alternative conceptions in college freshman chemistry (general and organic). J. Res. Sci. Teach., 1990, 27(10), 1053–1065.

  • Nakhleh, M., Why Some students don’t learn chemistry: chemical misconceptions. J. Chem. Educ., 1992, 69(3), 191–196.

  • Ayas, A. and Demirbaş, A., Turkish secondary students’ conception of introductory chemistry concepts. J. Chem. Educ., 1997, 74(5), 518–521.

  • Coll, R. K. and Treagust, D. F., Learners’ use of analogy and alternative conceptions for chemical bonding. Aust. Sci. Teach. J., 2001, 48(1), 24–32.

  • De Jong, O., Research and teaching practice in chemical education: living apart or together? Chem. Educ. Int., 2005, 6(1), 1–7.

  • ACS Guidelines and Recommendations for the Teaching of High School Chemistry, American Chemical Society, Washington, USA, 2012.

  • Sirhan, G., Learning difficulties in chemistry: an overview. J. Turk. Sci. Educ., 2007, 4(2), 2–20.

  • Pavlovic-Babic, D., Baucal, A. and Kuzmanovic, D., Naucna pismenost, PISA 2003 i PISA 2006 [Scientific literacy. PISA 2003 i PISA 2006], Beograd: Ministarstvo prosvete Republike Srbije, Zavod za vrednovanje kvaliteta obrazovanja i vaspitanja, Institut za psihologiju Filozofskog fakulteta Univerziteta u Beogradu.

  • Nahum, T. L., Mamlok‐Naaman, R., Hofstein, A. and Krajcik, J., Developing a new teaching approach for the chemical bonding concept aligned with current scientific and pedagogical knowledge. Sci. Educ., 2007, 91(4), 579–603.

  • Sisovic, D. and Bojovic, S., Evaluating achievement in chemistry learning through demonstration experiments. J. Educ., 1998, 1, 5–17.

  • Sisovic, D., Jankov, R. and Zindovic, G., Standards for student achievement in chemistry (part Ι). J. Educ., 2004, 2–3, 168–179.

  • Sisovic, D. and Bojovic, S., On the use of concept maps at different stages of chemistry teaching. Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 2000, 1, 135–144.

  • Sisovic, D. and Bojovic, S., Approaching the concepts of acids and bases by cooperative learning. Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 2000, 2, 263–275.

  • Kostic, D. A., Mitic, S. S., Gosnjic-Ignatovic, A. J., Randjelovic, J. and Zarubica, A. R., Correlation between traditional and computerbased interactive teaching method in the presentation of a lesson on proteins. New Educ. Rev., 2011, 25(3), 172–182.

  • Cohen, L., Manion, L. and Morrison, K., Metode istraživanja u obrazovanju (Research Methods in Education). Naklada Slap, Jastrebarsko, 2007.

  • Terhart, E., Methods of Teaching and Learning, Educa, Zagreb, 2001.

  • Horvat, R., Neorganska hemija za 2. razred gimnazije (Inorganic Chemistry for 2nd class of gymnasium). Zavod za udžbenike i nastavna sredstva (Institute for Textbooks and Teaching Resources), Belgrade, 1996.

  • Crichton, R. R., Biological Inorganic Chemistry, an Introduction, Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2008.

  • Shriver, D. F., Atkins, P. W., Overton, T. L., Rourke, J. P., Weller, M. T. and Armstrong, F. A., Inorganic Chemistry, Oxford University Press, New York, USA, 2006.

  • Rose, S., Vitamins and Minerals, Bounty Books, Division of Octopus Publishing Group Ltd, London, UK, 2007.

  • Challoner, J., The Visual Dictionary of Chemistry (Eyewitness Visual Dictionaries), Dorling Kindersley Limited, London, UK, 1996.

  • Nikolic, R. S., Kostic, D. A., Krstic, N. S., Trajkovic, A. and Stojanovic, N., A multidisciplinary approach to teaching metals as part of the elementary school curriculum in Serbia. New Educ. Rev., 2014, 36(2), 95–103.

  • Statistical Analysis and Reporting System, User Guide, version 1.0, 1999; http://ps-2.kev009.com/rs6000/manuals/Tape/3590/ 3590_Stats_Analysis_and_Reporting_System_User_Guide.pdf

  • Markovic, M., Randelovic, M., Trivic, D., Bojovic, S. and ZindovicVukadinovic, G., The effectiveness of different methods of teaching and learning chemistry in elementary school. J. Educ., 2006, 4, 398-413.

  • Sisovic, D., Student achievement in chemistry. In TIMSS 2003 in Serbia (eds Antonijevic, R. and Janjetovic, D.), Institute for Educational Research, Belgrade, 2005, pp. 215–245 (in Serbian).


Abstract Views: 380

PDF Views: 131




  • Multidisciplinary Approach to Teaching Inorganic Chemistry in High School:An Example of The Topic of Metals

Abstract Views: 380  |  PDF Views: 131

Authors

D. A. Kostic
Department of Chemistry, University of Nis, Visegradska 33, 18000 Nis, Serbia
R. S. Nikolic
Department of Chemistry, University of Nis, Visegradska 33, 18000 Nis, Serbia
N. S. Krstic
Department of Chemistry, University of Nis, Visegradska 33, 18000 Nis, Serbia
M. G. Nikolic
Department of Chemistry, University of Nis, Visegradska 33, 18000 Nis, Serbia
V. D. Dimitrijevic
Department of Chemistry, University of Nis, Visegradska 33, 18000 Nis, Serbia
S. Simic
Gymnasium Stevan Sremac, Street Vozda Karadorda 27, 18000 Nis, Serbia

Abstract


We present in this article a multidisciplinary approach to teaching high-school chemistry in Serbia, illustrated by an example of the course topic of metals. The aim is to increase the level of interest in studying chemistry and acquiring knowledge that is applicable in daily life. The experiment was carried out in four classes of second-year gymnasium students. The redesigned materials can serve as a model for the preparation of similar materials for other course topics. Multidisciplinary approach in processing of the lesson on metals and the redesigned curriculum content significantly increased the interest of the students and improved their knowledge.

Keywords


Inorganic Chemistry, High School, Multidisciplinary Approach, Teaching, Metals.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv115%2Fi2%2F268-273