Current Science

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Science and Engineering Research In India (1985–2016):Insights From Two Scientometric Databases


Affiliations
1 DST Centre for Policy Research, Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru - 560 012, India
 

We furnish scientometric data, for science and engineering, of research organizations in India, extracted principally from the Web of Science™ (WoS) database via their InCites™ tool. We classify the data into different granularity levels and address problems in their reliable extraction from publication metadata. We accumulate scientometric measures such as the numbers of publications, citations, and the h-index for the period 1985–2016. We use them to compare research performance in science and engineering, (a) across countries, very briefly, and (b) among Indian research organizations, for which we refine the data to carry out subject -level comparisons. A brief comparison with data from Scopus® and SciVal© is also included.

Keywords

Data Structure, H-Index, India, Research Performance, Scientometry.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Garfield, E., Citation indexes for science: A new dimension in documentation through association of ideas. Science, 1955, 122(3159), 108–111.

  • Bornmann, L., Mutz, R. and Daniel, H., Are there better indices for evaluation purposes than the h index? a comparison of nine different variants of the h index using data from biomedicine. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2008, 59(5), 830–837.

  • Costas, R. and Bordons, M., The h-index: Advantages, limitations and its relation with other bibliometric indicators at the micro level. J. Informetr., 2007, 1(3), 193–203.

  • QS world university rankings; https://www.topuniversities.com/university-rankings (accessed on 30 April 2017).

  • The world university rankings; https://www.timeshighereducation.com/world-university-rankings (accessed on 30 April 2017).

  • ARWU world university rankings; http://www.shanghairanking.com/ (accessed on 30 April 2017).

  • Bhattacharya, S., Shilpa and Kaul, A., Emerging countries assertion in the global publication landscape of science: a case study of India. Scientometrics, 2015, 103(2), 387–411.

  • Haiqi, Z. and Yuhua, Z., Scientometric study on research performance in China. Inf. Process. Manage., 1997, 33(1), 81–89.

  • Kostoff, R. N. et al., Assessment of India’s research literature. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, 2007, 74(9), 1574–1608.

  • Garg, K. C., Dutt, B. and Kumar, S., Scientometric profile of Indian science as seen through science citation index. Ann. Lib. Inform. Stud., 2006, 53(3), 114.

  • Gupta, B. and Dhawan, S., Status of India in science and technology as reflected in its publication output in the Scopus international database, 1996 to 2006. Scientometrics, 2009, 80(2), 473–490.

  • Guan, J. and Ma, N., A comparative study of research performance in computer science. Scientometrics, 2004, 61(3), 339–359.

  • Banshal, S. K., Singhal, K., Singh, V. K. and Uddin, A., Computer science research in India: a scientometric study. In The 12th IEEE India International Conference INDICON, 2015.

  • Modak, J. M. and Madras, G., Scientometric analysis of chemical engineering publications. Curr. Sci., 2008, 94(10), 1265–1272.

  • Ravichandra, I. R. and Suma, M., A quantitative study of Indian engineering literature. Scientometrics, 1999, 46(3), 605–619.

  • InCites; https://incites.thomsonreuters.com (accessed on 30 April 2017).

  • National Information Standards Organization (US), Understanding Metadata, NISO Press, 2004.

  • ISI (web of knowledge); https://www.webofknowledge.com/ (accessed on 30 April 2017).

  • InCites handbook; https://www.researchanalytics.thomsonreuters.com/m/pdfs/indicators-handbook.pdf (accessed on 30 April 2017).

  • Hirsch, J. E., An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2005, 102(46), 16569–16572.

  • Wendl, M. C., h-index: however ranked, citations need context. Nature, 2007, 449, 403.

  • Bornmann, L. and Marx, W., The h-index as a research performance indicator. Eur. Sci. Ed., 2011, 37(3), 77–80.

  • Waltman L. and van Eck, N., The inconsistency of the h-index. J. Am. Soc. Inform. Sci. Technol., 2012, 63(2), 406–415.

  • Heer, J. and Bostock, M., Crowd sourcing graphical perception: Using mechanical turk to assess visualization design. In ACM Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), 2010, pp. 203–212.

  • Prathap, G., The performance of research-intensive higher educational institutions in India. Curr. Sci., 2014, 107(03), 389–396.

  • SciVal – User Guide, Elsevier, 2014.

  • Wang, D., Song, C. and Barabasi, A., Quantifying long-term scientific impact. Science, 2013, 342(6154), 127–132.


Abstract Views: 454

PDF Views: 127




  • Science and Engineering Research In India (1985–2016):Insights From Two Scientometric Databases

Abstract Views: 454  |  PDF Views: 127

Authors

A. Jaya Kumar
DST Centre for Policy Research, Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru - 560 012, India
Rahul Pandit
DST Centre for Policy Research, Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru - 560 012, India

Abstract


We furnish scientometric data, for science and engineering, of research organizations in India, extracted principally from the Web of Science™ (WoS) database via their InCites™ tool. We classify the data into different granularity levels and address problems in their reliable extraction from publication metadata. We accumulate scientometric measures such as the numbers of publications, citations, and the h-index for the period 1985–2016. We use them to compare research performance in science and engineering, (a) across countries, very briefly, and (b) among Indian research organizations, for which we refine the data to carry out subject -level comparisons. A brief comparison with data from Scopus® and SciVal© is also included.

Keywords


Data Structure, H-Index, India, Research Performance, Scientometry.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv115%2Fi3%2F399-409