Current Science

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Organic Residue Analysis in Archaeological Ceramics from Lahuradewa, India:Role of Contaminants


Affiliations
1 Department of Geology, Presidency University, Kolkata 700 073, India
2 Department of Archaeology and Classical Studies, Stockholm University, 106 91 Stockholm, Sweden
 

Organic residue, often amorphous or invisible to the naked eye, cannot be characterized by using traditional archaeological techniques. Such residues are a result of plant and animal product processing either by heating or due to mechanical action1-4. Organic residues, in contrast to the food crusts, are often better preserved in the mineral matrices of the pottery fabric that protect the organic molecules from microbiological degradation4,5. The biomolecular components of organic residue are used as a tool to identify the source of the residue6, and to glean information on economic and subsistence practices associated with prehistoric cultural and technological traditions4,7-9. This makes organic residue analysis a well-established tool in geoarchaeology.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Chang, T. T., Euphytica, 1976, 25, 425-441.

  • Stern, B., Heron, C., Serpico, M. and Bouiau, J., Archaeometry, 2000, 42, 399-414.

  • Evershed, R. P., Dudd, S. N., Lockhart, M. J. and Jim, S., Handbook o f Archaeological Science, Chichester, 2001.

  • Evershed, R. P., Archaeometry, 2008, 50, 895-924.

  • Regert, M., Bland, H. A., Dudd, S. N., van Bergen, P. F. and Evershed, R. P., Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. B, 1998, 265, 2027-2032.

  • Gregg, M. W. and Slater, G. F., Archaeometry, 2010, 52, 833-854.

  • Barnard, H. et al. , J. Archaeol. Sci. , 2007, 34, 28-37.

  • Craig, O. E. et al., Nature, 2013, 496, 351-354.

  • Lucquin, A. et al. , Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2016, 113, 3991-3996.

  • Dudd, S. N. and Evershed, R. P., Science, 1998, 282, 1478-1481.

  • Isaksson, S., Olsson, M. and Hjulstrom, B., Fornvannen, 2005, 100, 179-191.

  • Hansel, F. A., Copley, M. S., Madureira, L. A. S. and Evershed, R. P., Tetrahedron Lett., 2004, 45, 2999-3002.

  • Olsson, M. and Isaksson, S., J. Archaeol. Sci., 2008, 35, 773-780.

  • Hjulstrom, B., Isaksson, S. and Karlsson, C., Acta Archaeol., 2008, 79, 62-78.

  • Evershed, R. P., Stott, A. W., Raven, A., Dudd, A. N., Charters, S. and Leyden, A., Tetrahedron Lett., 1995, 36, 8875-8878.

  • Isaksson, S., Karlsson, C. and Eriksson, T., J. Archaeol. Sci., 2010, 37, 3263-3268.

  • Isaksson, S., Curr. Swedish Archaeol., 2009, 17, 131-149.

  • Tewari, R., Srivastava, R. K., Singh, K. K., Saraswat, K. S., Singh, I. B. and Chauhan, M. S., Pragdhara, 2006, 16, 35-68.

  • Tewari, R., Man Environ., 2004, XXIX, 102-116.

  • Joglekar, P. P., Pragdhara, 2006, 18, 309-321.

  • Saxena, A., Prasad, V., Singh, I. B., Chauhan, M. S. and Hasan, R., Curr. Sci., 2006, 90, 1547-1552.

  • Sharma, G. R., Misra, V. D., Mandai, D., Misra, B. B. and Pal, J. N., Beginnings of agriculture: (Epi-Palaeolithic to neolithic; excavations at Chopani-Mando, Mahadaha and Mahagara), Abinash Prakashan, Allahabad, India, 1980.

  • Possehl, G. L. and Rissman, P. C., In Chronologies in Old World Archaeology (ed. Ehrich, R. W.), The University of Chicago Press, 1992, 3rd edn, vol. 1.

  • Saraswat, K. S., Pragdhara, 2004, 15, 145-177.

  • Weyermann, C., Roux, C. and Champod, C., J. Forensic Sci., 2011, 56, 102-108.

  • Baeten, J., Jervis, B., De Vos, D. and Waelkens, M., Archaeometry, 2013, 55, 1150-1174.

  • Romanus, K., Poblome, J., Verbeke, K., Luypaerts, A., Jacobs, P., De Vos, D., and Waelkens, M., Archaeometry, 2007, 49, 729-747.

  • Emerson, B., Gidden, J., Lay Jr, J. O. and Durham, B., J. Forensic Sci., 2011, 56, 381-389.

  • Buchanan, M. V., Asano, K. and Bohanan, A., SPIE, 1997, 2941, 89-95.


Abstract Views: 368

PDF Views: 117




  • Organic Residue Analysis in Archaeological Ceramics from Lahuradewa, India:Role of Contaminants

Abstract Views: 368  |  PDF Views: 117

Authors

Supriyo Kumar Das
Department of Geology, Presidency University, Kolkata 700 073, India
Santanu Ghosh
Department of Geology, Presidency University, Kolkata 700 073, India
Sven Isaksson
Department of Archaeology and Classical Studies, Stockholm University, 106 91 Stockholm, Sweden
Kerstin Liden
Department of Archaeology and Classical Studies, Stockholm University, 106 91 Stockholm, Sweden
Arunabha Dey
Department of Geology, Presidency University, Kolkata 700 073, India

Abstract


Organic residue, often amorphous or invisible to the naked eye, cannot be characterized by using traditional archaeological techniques. Such residues are a result of plant and animal product processing either by heating or due to mechanical action1-4. Organic residues, in contrast to the food crusts, are often better preserved in the mineral matrices of the pottery fabric that protect the organic molecules from microbiological degradation4,5. The biomolecular components of organic residue are used as a tool to identify the source of the residue6, and to glean information on economic and subsistence practices associated with prehistoric cultural and technological traditions4,7-9. This makes organic residue analysis a well-established tool in geoarchaeology.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv115%2Fi8%2F1456-1458