Current Science

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Monitoring of Total Volatile Organic Compounds and Particulate Matter in an Indoor Environment


Affiliations
1 Academy of Scientific and Innovative Research, Mathura Road, New Delhi 110 025, India
2 Transport Planning Division, CSIR-Central Road Research Institute, Mathura Road, New Delhi 110 025,, India
3 Environment Science Division, CSIR-Central Road Research Institute, Mathura Road, New Delhi 110 025, India
 

Indoor air pollution in the workplace is considered as one of the most potential environment risks to an occupant’s health. Office employees are exposed to airborne pollutants that include particulate matter (PM), volatile organic compounds (VOCs), gases chemicals and microorganisms originating from indoor and ourdoor sources. Exposure to PM and VOCs is likely to be higher in the workplace than outdoors due to the amount of time people spend in the indoor environment. A weekly monitoring of VOCs and PM with sampling period of 8 h was carried out in an indoor (office) environment in order to evaluate the exposure to pollutant concentration. The sampling was carried out with the help of a Grimm dust monitor and potable VOC monitor for PM and VOCs respectively. The results clearly show that exposure to PM and VOCs is much higher in an office building.

Keywords

Indoor Environment, Particulate Matter, Office, Volatile Organic Compounds.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Datta, A., Suresh, R., Gupta, A., Singh, D. and Kulshrestha, P., Indoor air quality of non-residential urban buildings in Delhi, India. Int. J. Sustain. Built Environ., 2017, 1–91.

  • Kamarulzaman, N., Saleh, A. A., Hashim, S. Z., Hashim, H. and Abdul-Ghani, A. A., An overview of the influence of physical office environments towards employee. Proc. Eng., 2011, 20, 262–268.

  • Bruce, N., Perez-Padilla, R. and Albalak, R., Indoor air pollution in developing countries: a major environmental and public health challenge. Bull. WHO, 2000, 78, 1078–1092.

  • Smith, K. R., Indoor air pollution in developing countries: recommendations for research. Indoor Air, 2002, 12, 198–207.

  • United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air and Radiation (OAR). Indoor Environments Division. An office building occupant’s guide to indoor air quality. EPA-402-K-97-003, 1997.

  • Fromme, H., Twardella, D., Dietrich, S., Heitmann, D., Schierl, R., Liebl, B. and Rüden, H., Particulate matter in the indoor air of classrooms – exploratory results from Munich and surrounding area. Atmosph. Environ., 2007, 41, 854–866.

  • Panagopoulos, I. K., Karayannis, A. N., Kassomenos, P. and Aravossis, K., A CFD simulation study of VOC and formaldehyde indoor air pollution dispersion in an apartment as part of an indoor pollution management plan. Aerosol Air Qual. Res., 2011, 11, 758–762.

  • Ncube, M. and Riffat, S., Developing an indoor environment quality tool for assessment of mechanically ventilated office buildings in the UK – a preliminary study. Build. Environ., 2012, 53, 26– 33.

  • Lee, S. C., Lam, S. and Fai, H. K., Characterization of VOCs, ozone, and PM 10 emissions from office equipment in an environmental chamber. Build. Environ., 2001, 36, 837–842.

  • Wolkoff, P. and Nielsen, G. D., Organic compounds in indoor air – their relevance for perceived indoor air quality? Atmosph. Environ., 2001, 35, 4407–4417.

  • Kagi, N. et al., Indoor air quality for chemical and ultrafine particle contaminants from printers. Build. Environ., 2007, 42, 1949– 1954.

  • Horemans, B. and Van Grieken, R., Speciation and diurnal variation of thoracic, fine thoracic and sub-micrometer airborne particulate matter at naturally ventilated office environments. Atmos. Environ., 2010, 44, 1497–1505.

  • Barrese, E., Gioffrè, A., Scarpelli, M., Turbante, D., Trovato, R. and Iavicoli, S., Indoor pollution in work office: VOCs, formaldehyde, and ozone by printer. Occup. Dis. Environ. Med., 2014, 2, 49–55.

  • Chatoutsidou, S. E., Ondráček, J., Tesar, O., Tørseth, K., Ždímal, V. and Lazaridis, M., Indoor/outdoor particulate matter number and mass concentration in modern offices. Build. Environ., 2015, 92, 462–474.

  • Szigeti, T. et al., Oxidative potential and chemical composition of PM 2.5 in office buildings across Europe – the OFFICAIR study. Environ. Int., 2016, 92, 324–333.

  • Koponen, I. K., Asmi, A., Keronen, P., Puhto, K. and Kulmala, M., Indoor air measurement campaign in Helsinki, Finland 1999 – the effect of outdoor air pollution on indoor air. Atmos. Environ., 2001, 35,1465–1477.

  • Berrios, I. T., Zhang, J. S., Guo, B., Smith, J. and Zhang, Z., Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) emissions from sources in a partitioned office environment and their impact on IAQ. In 10th International Conference on Indoor Air Quality and Climate (Indoor Air 2005), Tsinghua University Press, Beijing, China, 2005.

  • Raaschou-Nielsen, O., Sørensen, M., Hertel, O., Chawes, B. L., Vissing, N., Bønnelykke, K. and Bisgaard, H., Predictors of indoor fine particulate matter in infants’ bedrooms in Denmark. Environ. Res., 2011, 111, 87–93.

  • Rockstroh, J., Jann, O., Wilke, O. and Horn, Development of a reliable test method for laser printers, copiers and multifunctional devices in emission test chambers – Part 1, Gefahrstoffe – Reinhaltung der Luft, 2005, vol. 65, pp. 71–80.

  • Saraga, D. E., Maggos, T., Helmis, C. G., Michopoulos, J., Bartzis, J. G. and Vasilakos, C., PM1 and PM2.5 ionic composition and VOCs measurements in two typical apartments in Athens, Greece: investigation of smoking contribution to indoor air concentrations. Environ. Monit. Assess., 2010, 167, 321–331.

  • Yu, B. F., Hu, Z. B., Liu, M., Yang, H. L., Kong, Q. X. and Liu, Y. H., Review of research on air-conditioning systems and indoor air quality control for human health. Int. J. Refrig., 2009, 32, 3–20.

  • Chao, C. Y. and Wong, K. K., Residential indoor PM 10 and PM 2.5 in Hong Kong and the elemental composition. Atmos. Environ., 2002, 36, 265–277.

  • Morawska, L. and Zhang, J. J., Combustion sources of particles. 1. Health relevance and source signatures. Chemosphere, 2002, 49, 1045–1058.

  • He, C., Morawska, L., Hitchins, J. and Gilbert, D., Contribution from indoor sources to particle number and mass concentrations in residential houses. Atmos. Environ., 2004, 38, 3405–3415.

  • Pekey, H. and Arslanbaş, D., The relationship between indoor, outdoor and personal VOC concentrations in homes, offices and schools in the metropolitan region of Kocaeli, Turkey. Water, Air, Soil Pollut., 2008, 191, 113–129.

  • Chen, C. and Zhao, B., Review of relationship between indoor and outdoor particles: I/O ratio, infiltration factor and penetration factor. Atmos. Environ., 2011, 45, 275–288.

  • Lunden, M. M., Kirchstetter, T. W., Thatcher, T. L., Hering, S. V. and Brown, N. J., Factors affecting the indoor concentrations of carbonaceous aerosols of outdoor origin. Atmos. Environ., 2008, 42, 5660–5671.


Abstract Views: 289

PDF Views: 102




  • Monitoring of Total Volatile Organic Compounds and Particulate Matter in an Indoor Environment

Abstract Views: 289  |  PDF Views: 102

Authors

Manisha Gaur
Academy of Scientific and Innovative Research, Mathura Road, New Delhi 110 025, India
Kirti Bhandari
Transport Planning Division, CSIR-Central Road Research Institute, Mathura Road, New Delhi 110 025,, India
Anuradha Shukla
Environment Science Division, CSIR-Central Road Research Institute, Mathura Road, New Delhi 110 025, India

Abstract


Indoor air pollution in the workplace is considered as one of the most potential environment risks to an occupant’s health. Office employees are exposed to airborne pollutants that include particulate matter (PM), volatile organic compounds (VOCs), gases chemicals and microorganisms originating from indoor and ourdoor sources. Exposure to PM and VOCs is likely to be higher in the workplace than outdoors due to the amount of time people spend in the indoor environment. A weekly monitoring of VOCs and PM with sampling period of 8 h was carried out in an indoor (office) environment in order to evaluate the exposure to pollutant concentration. The sampling was carried out with the help of a Grimm dust monitor and potable VOC monitor for PM and VOCs respectively. The results clearly show that exposure to PM and VOCs is much higher in an office building.

Keywords


Indoor Environment, Particulate Matter, Office, Volatile Organic Compounds.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv115%2Fi9%2F1787-1792