Current Science

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Pivotal 20th Century Contributions to the Development of the Anthropocene Concept:Overview and Implications


Affiliations
1 Institute of Biological and Health Sciences, Federal University of Alagoas, Praça Afrânio Jorge, s/n, Prado, Maceió, AL, Brazil
2 Department of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Ankara University, Cemal Gürsel Cad., Cebeci, Ankara, Turkey
 

Humans have become such dominant drivers of planetary changes that scientists are now debating the establishment of a new epoch: the Anthropocene. The concept of the Anthropocene has gained rapid visibility, quickly becoming a trademark of 21st century scientific literature. Interestingly, some studies claim that this idea can be traced back to the 19th and 20th centuries, others suggest that this concept is strongly associated with emerging multidisciplinary views of humans as drivers of global environmental change. In this article, we analyse bibliographical data to trace the key 20th century contributions towards the development of this concept in scientific literature. Using data from Web of Science, we identify five historical citation peaks and show that their associated key publications stem both from natural and social sciences, clearly highlighting the multidisciplinary nature of Anthropocene science. With the ongoing debate for a formal definition of the Anthropocene epoch, we argue that a geological definition aligned with the interdisciplinary development of the concept may be the best way to ensure that it remains relevant to the wider scientific community.

Keywords

Bibliometrics, Citations, Multidisciplinary Science, Reference Publication Year Spectroscopy, Scientometrics.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Steffen, W., Crutzen, P. J. and McNeill, J. R., The anthropocene: are humans now overwhelming the great forces of nature. Ambio, 2007, 36, 614–621.

  • Steffen, W., Grinevald, J., Crutzen, P. and McNeill, J., The anthropocene: conceptual and historical perspectives. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci., 2011, 369, 842–867.

  • Kareiva, P., Watts, S., McDonald, R. and Boucher, T., Domesticated nature: shaping landscapes and ecosystems for human welfare. Science, 2007, 316, 1866–1869.

  • Ellis, E. C., Goldewijk, K. K., Siebert, S., Lightman, D. and Ramankutty, N., Anthropogenic transformation of the biomes, 1700 to 2000. Global Ecol. Biogeogr., 2010, 19, 589–606.

  • Ellis, E. C., Anthropogenic transformation of the terrestrial biosphere. Philos. Trans. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci., 2011, 369, 1010–1035.

  • Steffen, W. et al., Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet. Science, 2015, 347, 736.

  • Rockström, J. et al., A safe operating space for humanity. Nature, 2009, 461, 472–475.

  • Crutzen, P. J. and Stoermer, E. F., The anthropocene. Global Change Newsl., 2000, 41, 17–18.

  • Lövbrand, E. et al., Who speaks for the future of earth? How critical social science can extend the conversation on the anthropocene. Global Environ. Chang, 2015, 32, 211–218.

  • Chin, A., Gillson, L., Quiring, S., Nelson, D., Taylor, M. P., Vanacker, V. and Lovegrove, D., An evolving anthropocene for science and society. Anthropocene, 2016, 13, 1–3.

  • Brondizio, E. S. et al., Re-conceptualizing the anthropocene: a call for collaboration. Global Environ. Chang., 2016, 39, 318–327.

  • Chin, A., Fu, R., Harbor, J., Taylor, M. P. and Vanacker, V., Anthropocene: Human interactions with earth systems. Anthropocene, 2013, 1, 1–2.

  • Brasseur, G. P. and van der Pluijm, B., Earth’s future: navigating the science of the anthropocene. Earth's Future, 2013, 1, 1–2.

  • Helmig, D., Dean, C., Kurtz, M. and Elementa Editorial and Production Team, Elementa: Science of the anthropocene – a new nonprofit, open-access journal publishing scientific research specific to the anthropocene in a multidisciplinary format. In Earth System Research Laboratory Global Monitoring Annual Conference (ed. Boulder, Colorado).

  • Oldfield, F., Barnosky, A. D., Dearing, J., Fischer-Kowalski, M., McNeill, J., Steffen, W. and Zalasiewicz, J., The anthropocene review: Its significance, implications and the rationale for a new transdisciplinary journal. The Anthropocene Rev., 2014, 1, 3–7.

  • Lewis, S. L. and Maslin, M. A., Defining the anthropocene. Nature, 2015, 519, 171–180.

  • Zalasiewicz, J., Williams, M., Haywood, A. and Ellis, M., The anthropocene: A new epoch of geological time? Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci., 2011, 369, 835–841.

  • Hamilton, C. and Grinevald, J., Was the anthropocene anticipated? The Anthropocene Rev., 2015, 2, 59–72.

  • Ellis, E. C., Maslin, M. A., Boivin, N. L. and Bauer, A., Involve social scientists in defining the anthropocene. Nature, 2016, 540, 192–193.

  • Ruddiman, W. F., Ellis, E. C., Kaplan, J. O. and Fuller, D. Q., Defining the epoch we live in. Science, 2015, 348, 38–39.

  • Marx, W., Bornmann, L., Barth, A. and Leydesdorff, L., Detecting the historical ischolar_mains of research fields by reference publication year spectroscopy (rpys). J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Tec., 2014, 65, 751– 764.

  • Bornmann, L., Thor, A., Marx, W. and Leydesdorff, L., Identifying seminal works most important for research fields: software for the reference publication year spectroscopy (rpys). COLLNET J. Scientomet. Infn. Manage., 2016, 10, 125–140.

  • Brad Wray, K. and Bornmann, L., Philosophy of science viewed through the lense of ‘references publication years spectroscopy’ (RPYS). Scientometrics, 2015, 102, 1987–1996.

  • Comins, J. A. and Hussey, T. W., Detecting seminal research contributions to the development and use of the global positioning system by reference publication year spectroscopy. Scientometrics, 2015, 104, 575–580.

  • Marx, W. and Bornmann, L., Tracing the origin of a scientific legend by reference publication year spectroscopy (RPYS): The legend of the darwin finches. Scientometrics, 2014, 99, 839–844.

  • R Core Team, R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, 2016.

  • Holling, C. S., Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 1973, 4, 1–23.

  • Deleuze, G. and Guattari, F., Anti-oedipus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, 1983.

  • Best, S. and Kellner, D., Postmodern Theory: Critical Interrogations, Macmillian, Hampshire, 1991.

  • WCED, Our Common Future, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1987.

  • Borowy, I., Defining Sustainable Development for Our Common Future: A History of the World Commission on Environment and Development (Brundtland Commission), Routledge, Abingdon, 2014.

  • Cronon, W., Uncommon ground: Toward Reinventing Nature, Norton, New York, 1995.

  • Manesh, G., ‘Champion works’: how countries pan out? Curr. Sci., 2012, 103, 1260–1261.

  • Manisha, M. and Manesh, G., Bibliometric characteristics of champion works of china and India. Scientometrics, 2014, 98, 1101–1111.

  • Akyüz, Z. C. and Correia, R. A., A bibliometric analysis of high impact research in the middle east using champion works. Int. Inf. Lib. Rev., 2016, 49, 11–18.

  • Latour, B., We have never been Modern, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1993.

  • Vitousek, P. M., Mooney, H. A., Lubchenco, J. and Melillo, J. M., Human domination of earth's ecosystems. Science, 1997, 277, 494–499.

  • Deleuze, G. and Guattari, F., A Thousand Plateaus, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, 1987.

  • Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Randers, J. and Behrens III, W. W., The Limits to Growth, Universe Books, New York, 1972.

  • Haraway, D. J., Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature, Routledge, New York, 1991.

  • Hooke, R. L., On the history of humans as geomorphic agents. Geology, 2000, 28, 843–846.

  • Braun, T. and Schubert, A., The growth of research on inter- and multidisciplinarity in science and social science papers, 1975– 2006. Scientometrics, 2007, 73, 345–351.

  • Finney, S. C., The ‘Anthropocene’ as a Ratified Unit in the ICS International Chronostratigraphic Chart: Fundamental Issues that must be Addressed by the Task Group, Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 2014, 395, pp. 23–28.

  • Palsson, G. et al., Reconceptualizing the ‘anthropos’ in the anthropocene: integrating the social sciences and humanities in global environmental change research. Environ. Sci. Pol., 2013, 28, 3–13.

  • Ellis, M. A. and Trachtenberg, Z., Which anthropocene is it to be? Beyond geology to a moral and public discourse. Earth's Future, 2013, 2, 122–125.

  • Malhi, Y., The concept of the anthropocene. Annu. Rev. Env. Resour., 2017, 42, 77–104.

  • Zalasiewicz, J., Waters, C. N. and Head, M. J., Anthropocene: its stratigraphic basis. Nature, 2017, 541, 289.

  • Braje, T. J. and Erlandson, J. M., Looking forward, looking back: humans, anthropogenic change, and the anthropocene. Anthropocene, 2013, 4, 116–121.

  • Autin, W. J., Multiple dichotomies of the anthropocene. Anthropocene Rev., 2016, 3, 218–230.

  • Berkhout, F., Anthropocene futures. The Anthropocene Rev., 2014, 1, 154–159.


Abstract Views: 338

PDF Views: 110




  • Pivotal 20th Century Contributions to the Development of the Anthropocene Concept:Overview and Implications

Abstract Views: 338  |  PDF Views: 110

Authors

Ricardo A. Correia
Institute of Biological and Health Sciences, Federal University of Alagoas, Praça Afrânio Jorge, s/n, Prado, Maceió, AL, Brazil
Zeynep C. H. Correia
Department of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Ankara University, Cemal Gürsel Cad., Cebeci, Ankara, Turkey
Ana C. M. Malhado
Institute of Biological and Health Sciences, Federal University of Alagoas, Praça Afrânio Jorge, s/n, Prado, Maceió, AL, Brazil
Richard J. Ladle
Institute of Biological and Health Sciences, Federal University of Alagoas, Praça Afrânio Jorge, s/n, Prado, Maceió, AL, Brazil

Abstract


Humans have become such dominant drivers of planetary changes that scientists are now debating the establishment of a new epoch: the Anthropocene. The concept of the Anthropocene has gained rapid visibility, quickly becoming a trademark of 21st century scientific literature. Interestingly, some studies claim that this idea can be traced back to the 19th and 20th centuries, others suggest that this concept is strongly associated with emerging multidisciplinary views of humans as drivers of global environmental change. In this article, we analyse bibliographical data to trace the key 20th century contributions towards the development of this concept in scientific literature. Using data from Web of Science, we identify five historical citation peaks and show that their associated key publications stem both from natural and social sciences, clearly highlighting the multidisciplinary nature of Anthropocene science. With the ongoing debate for a formal definition of the Anthropocene epoch, we argue that a geological definition aligned with the interdisciplinary development of the concept may be the best way to ensure that it remains relevant to the wider scientific community.

Keywords


Bibliometrics, Citations, Multidisciplinary Science, Reference Publication Year Spectroscopy, Scientometrics.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv115%2Fi10%2F1871-1875