Current Science

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Scientometric Analysis of Current Science


Affiliations
1 School of Science, UP Rajarshi Tandon Open University, Prayagraj 211 021, India
 

This article presents a scientometric analysis of Current Science. The publications of the journal have been analysed for a 28-year period (1990–2017). Several different parameters such as output pattern, collaboration trend, citation pattern, contributing countries and organizations, highly cited papers, etc. have been analysed. Graphs of keyword co-occurrences have also been generated to analyse the important themes of research and their trends over the years. The journal has been in existence for more than 85 years and, according to our knowledge there have been no earlier attempts towards its scientometric characterization. We find that the journal output has increased over the years. The authorship trend is found to be towards multi-authored papers. A fair percentage of the publications in the journal is cited. The rate of international collaboration is, however, not very high and most of the publications in the journal are from India. Major change is observed in the themes and trends of content published in Current Science during the study period, although the journal has remained India-focused.

Keywords

Bibliometrics, Current Science, Research Themes and Trends, Scientometric Analysis.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Krishnan, R. and Balaram, P., Current Science: some early history. Curr. Sci., 2007, 92(1), 129–138; https://www.currentscience.ac.in/Downloads/article_id_092_01_0129_0138_0.pdf

  • Biljecki, F., A scientometric analysis of selected GIScience journals. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci., 2016, 30(7), 1302–1335; doi:10.1080/13658816.2015.1130831.

  • Davarpanah, M. R. and Aslekia, S., A scientometric analysis of international LIS journals: productivity and characteristics. Scientometrics, 2008, 77(1), 21–39; doi:10.1007/s11192-007-1803-z.

  • Lowry, P. B., Humpherys, S. L., Malwitz, J. and Nix, J., A scientometric study of the perceived quality of business and technical communication journals. IEEE Trans Prof Commun., 2007, 50(4), 352–378; doi:10.1109/TPC.2007.908733.

  • Schloegl, C. and Stock, W. G., Impact and relevance of LIS journals: a scientometric analysis of international and Germanlanguage LIS journals – Citation analysis versus reader survey. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2004, 55(13), 1155–1168; doi:10.1002/asi.20070.

  • Andrikopoulos, A. and Trichas, G., Publication patterns and coauthorship in the Journal of Corporate Finance. J. Corp. Financ., 2018, 51, 98–108; doi:10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2018.05.008.

  • Bharvi, D., Garg, K. C. and Bali, A., Scientometrics of the international journal Scientometrics. Scientometrics, 2003, 56(1), 81– 93; doi:10.1023/A:1021950607895.

  • Nishy, P., Parvatharajan, P. and Prathap, G., Visibility and impact of the Indian Journal of Chemistry, Section B during 2005–2009 using scientometric techniques. Indian J. Chem. – Sect. B, 2012, 51(1), 269–284.

  • Ravikumar, S, Agrahari, A. and Singh, S. N., Mapping the intellectual structure of scientometrics: a co-word analysis of the journal Scientometrics (2005–2010). Scientometrics, 2015, 102(1), 929–955; doi:10.1007/s11192-014-1402-8.

  • Young, L., Wilkinson, I. and Smith, A., A scientometric analysis of publications in the Journal of Business-to-Business Marketing 1993–2014. J. Bus.-Bus Market, 2015, 22(1–2), 111–123; doi:10.1080/1051712X.2015.1021591.

  • Arkhipov, D. B., Scientometric analysis of Nature, the journal. Scientometrics, 1999, 46(1), 51–72; doi:10.1007/BF02766295.

  • Serenko, A. and Bontis, N., Meta-review of knowledge management and intellectual capital literature: citation impact and research productivity rankings. Knowl. Process. Manage., 2004, 11(3), 185–198; doi:10.1002/kpm.203.

  • Egghe, L. and Ravichandra Rao, I. K., Citation age data and the obsolescence function: fits and explanations. Inf. Process. Manage., 1992, 28(2), 201–217; doi:10.1016/0306-4573(92)90046-3.

  • Huang, D., Temporal evolution of multi-author papers in basic sciences from 1960 to 2010. Scientometrics, 2015, 105(3), 2137– 2147; doi:10.1007/s11192-015-1760-x.

  • Kishor, P. B. K. et al., Regulation of proline biosynthesis, degradation, uptake and transport in higher plants: its implications in plant growth and abiotic stress tolerance. Curr Sci., 2005, 88(3), 424–438.

  • Aria, M. and Cuccurullo, C., Bibliometrix: an R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. J. Informetr., 2017, 11(4), 959– 975; doi:10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007.

  • Pons, P. and Latapy, M., Computing communities in large networks using random walks. In Computer and Information Sciences – ISCIS 2005 (eds Yolum et al.), Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer, 2005, vol. 3733, pp. 284–293; doi:10.1007/11569596_31.


Abstract Views: 430

PDF Views: 111




  • Scientometric Analysis of Current Science

Abstract Views: 430  |  PDF Views: 111

Authors

Marisha
School of Science, UP Rajarshi Tandon Open University, Prayagraj 211 021, India

Abstract


This article presents a scientometric analysis of Current Science. The publications of the journal have been analysed for a 28-year period (1990–2017). Several different parameters such as output pattern, collaboration trend, citation pattern, contributing countries and organizations, highly cited papers, etc. have been analysed. Graphs of keyword co-occurrences have also been generated to analyse the important themes of research and their trends over the years. The journal has been in existence for more than 85 years and, according to our knowledge there have been no earlier attempts towards its scientometric characterization. We find that the journal output has increased over the years. The authorship trend is found to be towards multi-authored papers. A fair percentage of the publications in the journal is cited. The rate of international collaboration is, however, not very high and most of the publications in the journal are from India. Major change is observed in the themes and trends of content published in Current Science during the study period, although the journal has remained India-focused.

Keywords


Bibliometrics, Current Science, Research Themes and Trends, Scientometric Analysis.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv117%2Fi2%2F190-197