Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Trends and Insights of Agroforestry Practices in Madhya Pradesh, India


Affiliations
1 Indian Institute of Forest Management, Nehru Nagar, Bhopal 462 003, India
2 Department of Silviculture and Agroforestry, College of Forestry, Navsari Agricultural University, Navsari 396 450, India
3 Madhya Pradesh Forest Department, Bhopal 462 004, India
4 Indira Gandhi National Tribal University, Amarkantak 484 887, India
5 College of Forestry, VCSG Uttarakhand University of Horticulture and Forestry, Hill Campus, Ranichauri, Tehri Garhwal 249 199, India
 

Agroforestry practices in Madhya Pradesh (MP), India existed in the primordial times, which can be evidenced almost in every region of the state; however, the pace of scientific inclusion in agroforestry and its extension is quite slow. There is lack of priority and limited work has been done related to agroforestry practices, possibly due to the presence of large natural forest area in the state. In the present context, to meet the national target of forest cover and to reduce pressure on nature forest, agroforestry seems to be a viable option as it provides a source of income for farming and tribal communities along with countless environmental benefits. This article provides a review and insight of agroforestry and extent of agriculture, horticulture and agroforestry in MP. It also provides information on diverse tree species under agroforestry systems, a mosaic of tree–crop combinations and horticulture species preferred by the farmers in different agro-climatic zones of the state. The authors have also tried to enlist the efforts of various government initiatives and other agencies involved in the extension of agroforestry in the state. The roles of MP Forest Department, MP Forest Development Corporation and allied Departments of the state in agroforestry and tree planting have also been discussed. Marketing of agroforestry produce, farmers’ involvement in agroforestry practices and identification of key policy constraints of agroforestry in the state have been discussed and critically analysed.

Keywords

Agroforestry Practices, Agriculture, Agroclimatic Regions, Horticulture.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Viswanath, S., Kaushik, P. K., Pandey, D. K. and Amit, S., Effect of A. nilotica on rainfed rice crop in Chhattisgarh, Madhy Pradesh. Ann. For., 1998, 6(1), 103–109.
  • Viswanath, S., Nair, P. K. R., Kaushik, P. K. and Prakasam, U., Acacia nilotica trees in rice fields: a traditional agroforestry system in central India. Agrofor. Syst., 2000, 50(2), 157–177.
  • FSI, India State of Forest Report, Forest Survey of India, Dehradun, 2015.
  • Census 2011, Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India (GoI), 2011.
  • http://www.mp.gov.in/unlimited-potential-in-agriculture
  • http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/bhopal/M-P-bags-award-for-4th-year-2-farmers-to-get-Krishi-KarmanAward/articleshow/5067-3411.cms
  • http://www.prsindia.org/administrator/uploads/general/1489033061~~MP%20Budget%202017-18.pdf
  • Madhya Pradesh Development Report/Planning Commission, Agriculture in Madhya Pradesh, 2009.
  • DES, A report on assessment of marketable and marketed surplus of wheat, gram and tur in Madhya Pradesh, Directorate of Economics and Statistics, Ministry of Agriculture, GoI, 2014; http://jnkvv.org/PDF/AERC/Study-110.pdf
  • Lal, M., Singh, K. K., Srinivasan, G., Rathore, L. S., Naidu, D. and Tripathi, C. N., Growth and yield responses of soybean in Madhya Pradesh, India to climate variability and change. Agric. For. Meteorol., 1999, 93(1), 53–70.
  • De, D., Singh, R. S. and Chandra, H., Technological impact on energy consumption in rainfed soybean cultivation in Madhya Pradesh. Appl. Energy, 2001, 70(3), 193–213.
  • Mandal, K. G., Saha, K. P., Ghosh, P. K., Hati, K. M. and Bandyopadhyay, K. K., Bioenergy and economic analysis of soybeanbased crop production systems in central India. Biomass Bioenergy, 2002, 23(5), 337–345.
  • Kaushik, V. K., Rathore, V. S. and Sood, N. K., Incidence of bollworms and losses caused to cotton in Madhya Pradesh, 1969, 31, 175–177.
  • Kannan, S., Problems of iron deficiency in different crop plants in India: causative factors and control measures. J. Plant Nutr., 1984, 7(1–5), 187–200.
  • Chouhan, S., Singh, S. R. K., Pande, A. K. and Gautam, U. S., Adoption dynamics of improved sugarcane cultivation in Madhya Pradesh. Indian Res. J. Extens. Educ., 2016, 13(2), 26–30.
  • www.indianetzone.com
  • Bhattacharya, A. K. and Basnyat, B., Lok Vanaki – a recent innovative approach for managing private forestry in Madhya Pradesh, India. Banko Janakari, 2005, 15(2), 24–27.
  • mpforest.org/lokvaniki.html
  • http://www.business-standard.com/article/markets/corporate-sector-enters-sandalwood-plantation-111040800086_1.html
  • http://www.mpsfdc.com/Workshop%20Proceeding.pdf
  • http://www.dsgroup.com/agro-forestry.aspx
  • http://bilttreetech.com/about-history.asp
  • Tewari, S. K., Agro-forestry Project; Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, College of Agriculture, G.B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology Pantnagar 263145 (14-1-2008), 2008.
  • Bleasdale, J. K. A., The relationship between the weight of a plant part and total weight as affected by plant density. J. Hortic. Sci., 1967, 42(1), 51–58.
  • Gupta, N., Singh, M. and Sharma, R. P., Evaluation of integrated horticulture-cum-fish farming in Malwa Region of Madhya Pradesh, India. Curr. World Environ., 2015, 10(2), 667.
  • Chavan, S. B., Keerthika, A., Dhyani, S. K., Handa, A. K., Newaj, R. and Rajarajan, K., National Agroforestry Policy in India: a low hanging fruit. Curr. Sci., 2015, 108(10), 1826.
  • Anis, M., Sharma, M. P. and Iqbal, M., Herbal ethnomedicine of the Gwalior forest division in Madhya Pradesh, India. Pharma. Biol., 2000, 38(4), 241–253.
  • Ginwal, H. S. and Gera, M., Genetic variation in seed germination and growth performance of 12 Acacia nilotica provenances in India. J. Trop. For. Sci., 2000, 12(2), 286–297.
  • Pandey, C. B., Singh, A. K. and Sharma, D. K., Soil properties under Acacia nilotica trees in a traditional agroforestry system in central India. Agrofor. Syst., 2000, 49(1), 53–61.
  • Roychoudhury, N., Chawhaan, P. H., Mandal, A. K. and Joshi, K. C., Genetic analysis of infestation of borer, Bruchus bilineatopygus Pic. (Coleoptera: Bruchidae), in seeds of Albizia procera (Roxb.) Benth. J. Trop. For., 2010, 26(2), 63–71.
  • Brodt, S. B., Interactions of formal and informal knowledge systems in village-based tree management in central India. Agric. Hum. Values, 1999, 16(4), 355–363.
  • Jamatia, S., Livelihood of the bamboo base: challenges and opportunities. In Proceedings of 54th Society of Wood Science and Technology Conference on Sustainable Development of Wood and Biomass in our New Global Economy, International Bamboo and Rattan, Beijing China, 2012, vol. 20, pp. 1–16.
  • Kumar, R. S., Binu, N. K., Nishant, N., Buxy, S. and Sinha, G. N., A review of bamboo based agroforestry models developed in different parts of India, productivity and marketing aspects, 2014, pp. 45–52.
  • NHMAPMP: National Horticulture Mission, Action Plan for Madhya Pradesh, A report prepared by Rabo India Finance Private Limited, New Delhi, 2005.
  • http://www.mphorticulture.gov.in/agri_climatic.php
  • Prasad, R., Pandey, A. K., Newaj, R., Dhyani, S. K., Saroj, N. K. and Tripathi, V. D., Risk and vulnerability due to climate change and adaptation initiatives for agricultural resilience in Panna district of Madhya Pradesh, central India. Range Manage. Agrofor., 2014, 35(1), 157–162.
  • Pandey, D., Pandey, G. and Tripathi, M., Variability in aonla (Emblica officinalis Gaertn.) accessions collected from Madhya Pradesh. Prog. Hortic., 2014, 46(2), 280–284.
  • Gill, M. S., Singh, J. P. and Gangwar, K. S., Integrated farming system and agriculture sustainability. Indian J. Agron., 2010, 54(2), 128–139.
  • Current, D., Lutz, E. and Scherr, S. J., The costs and benefits of agroforestry to farmers. World Bank Res. Observ., 1995, 10(2), 151–180.
  • Dobriyal, M. J., Dashora, L. K., Maloo, S. R. and Sarolia, D., Improvement in livelihoods and benefits of small and marginal farmers through agroforestry interventions with carbon finance. In Proceedings of National Seminar on Agroforestry: an Evergreen Agriculture for Food Security and Environmental Resilience, Navsari Agricultural University, Navsari, 2–4 February 2012, pp. 201– 211.
  • MoA&FW, New steps, Progressive steps – a glimpse of achievement during June 2014 to December 2016, p. 27; ww.icar.org.in/E-Book/2016/English/index.htmlw, 2017.
  • Forest Department of MP, Research, Extension and Lok Vaniki, Krishi Vaniki se Krishak Samiridhi Yojana, 2016.
  • http://mpbusinessline.com/SectorDetails.aspx?authkey=N4UGMicYTfc=
  • http://planningcommission.nic.in/plans/stateplan/sdr/sdr_mp1909.pdf
  • MPFD, Madhya Pradesh Forestry Action Plan, Madhya Pradesh Forest Department, Bhopal, 1999.
  • MPFDC, Proceedings Consultative Workshop on PPP-based Farm Forestry, MP State Forest Development Corporation, 30 April 2013.
  • Pandey, D. N., Multifunctional Agroforestry system in India for livelihoods: current knowledge and future challenges (no. id: 204), 2005.
  • Lasco, R. D., Delfino, R. J. P., Catacutan, D. C., Simelton, E. S. and Wilson, D. M., Climate risk adaptation by smallholder farmers: the roles of trees and agroforestry. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain., 2014, 6, 83–88.
  • Dhyani, S. K., National Agroforestry Policy 2014 and the need for area estimation under agroforestry. Curr. Sci., 2014, 107(1), 9–10.
  • Chambers, R. and Leach, M., Trees as savings and security for the rural poor. World Dev., 1989, 17(3), 329–342.
  • Pandey, C. B., Pandya, K. S., Pandey, D. and Sharma, R. B., Growth and productivity of rice (Oryza sativa) as affected by Acacia nilotica in a traditional agroforestry system. Trop. Ecol., 1999, 40(1), 109–117.
  • Upadhyaya, S. D., Nema, S. and Bhargava, M. K., Agroforestry practices for food–fuel security in rainfed agro-ecosystem: a management option. Indian J. Agrofor., 2008, 10(1), 15–18.
  • Behari, B., Aggarwal, R., Singh, A. K. and Banerjee, S. K., Vegetation development in a degraded area under bamboo based agroforestry system. Indian For., 2000, 126(7), 710–720.
  • Chadhar, S. K. and Sharma, M. C., Survival and yield of four medicinal plant species grown under tree plantations of bhataland. Vaniki Sandesh, 1996, 20(4), 3–5.
  • Singh, R., Pal, R. S. and Banerjee, S., Growth performance of multipurpose tree species in degraded land under agroforestry practices. J. Trop. Forestry, 2009, 25(1/2), 24–29.
  • Khatri, N. and Reddy, G. R. S., Performance of multipurpose tree species in a Silvi-Olericultural system in India. In Proceedings of the National Workshop, Pune, India, 6–9 April 1994, pp. 47–50.
  • Chadhar, S. K., Six years of extension and research activities in Social Forestry Division, Jhabua (MP). Vaniki Sandesh, 2001, 25(4), 6–10.
  • Jain, A. and Ansari, S. A., Quantification by allometric equations of carbon sequestered by Tectona grandis in different agroforestry systems. J. For. Res., 2013, 24(4), 699–702.
  • Hymavathi, H. N., Kandya, A. K. and Patel, L. P., Beneficial effects of multiple plantation patterns in agroforestry systems. Indian For., 2010, 136(4), 465–475.

Abstract Views: 385

PDF Views: 141




  • Trends and Insights of Agroforestry Practices in Madhya Pradesh, India

Abstract Views: 385  |  PDF Views: 141

Authors

Arvind Bijalwan
Indian Institute of Forest Management, Nehru Nagar, Bhopal 462 003, India
Pooja Verma
Indian Institute of Forest Management, Nehru Nagar, Bhopal 462 003, India
Manmohan J. R. Dobriyal
Department of Silviculture and Agroforestry, College of Forestry, Navsari Agricultural University, Navsari 396 450, India
A. K. Patil
Madhya Pradesh Forest Department, Bhopal 462 004, India
Tarun Kumar Thakur
Indira Gandhi National Tribal University, Amarkantak 484 887, India
C. M. Sharma
College of Forestry, VCSG Uttarakhand University of Horticulture and Forestry, Hill Campus, Ranichauri, Tehri Garhwal 249 199, India

Abstract


Agroforestry practices in Madhya Pradesh (MP), India existed in the primordial times, which can be evidenced almost in every region of the state; however, the pace of scientific inclusion in agroforestry and its extension is quite slow. There is lack of priority and limited work has been done related to agroforestry practices, possibly due to the presence of large natural forest area in the state. In the present context, to meet the national target of forest cover and to reduce pressure on nature forest, agroforestry seems to be a viable option as it provides a source of income for farming and tribal communities along with countless environmental benefits. This article provides a review and insight of agroforestry and extent of agriculture, horticulture and agroforestry in MP. It also provides information on diverse tree species under agroforestry systems, a mosaic of tree–crop combinations and horticulture species preferred by the farmers in different agro-climatic zones of the state. The authors have also tried to enlist the efforts of various government initiatives and other agencies involved in the extension of agroforestry in the state. The roles of MP Forest Department, MP Forest Development Corporation and allied Departments of the state in agroforestry and tree planting have also been discussed. Marketing of agroforestry produce, farmers’ involvement in agroforestry practices and identification of key policy constraints of agroforestry in the state have been discussed and critically analysed.

Keywords


Agroforestry Practices, Agriculture, Agroclimatic Regions, Horticulture.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv117%2Fi4%2F597-605