Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Impact of Ecosystem Respiration on Carbon Balance in a Semi-Evergreen Forest of Northeast India


Affiliations
1 Department of Environmental Science, Tezpur University, Tezpur 784 028, India
2 Indian Institute of Tropical Meteorology, Pune 411 008, India
3 Savitribai Phule Pune University, Pune 411 007, India
4 Prince of Wales Institute of Engineering and Technology, Jorhat 785 001, India
 

We have estimated in this study the annual net ecosystem productivity (NEP) of Kaziranga National Park by using real-time eddy covariance data. We partitioned the net CO2 flux into gross primary productivity and ecosystem respiration (Re) using standardized method. Estimated annual NEP of the ecosystem 92.93 ± 1.7 g C m–2 year–1 indicated that the forest is a moderate sink of CO2 and is reported for the first time from a forest of Northeast India.

Keywords

Eddy Covariance, Gross Primary Productivity, Net Ecosystem Productivity.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Bhattacharyya, P., Neogi, S., Roy, K. S. and Rao, K. S., Gross primary production, ecosystem respiration and net ecosystem exchange in Asian rice paddy: an eddy covariance-based approach. Curr. Sci., 2013, 104(1), 67–75.
  • Magnani, F. et al., The human footprint in the carbon cycle of temperate and boreal forests. Nature, 2007, 447, 848–850.
  • Beer, C. et al., Terrestrial gross carbon dioxide uptake: Global distribution and covariation with climate. Science, 2010, 329, 834– 838.
  • Pita, G., Gielen, B., Zona, D., Rodrigues, A., Rambal, S., Janssens, I. A. and Ceulemans, R., Carbon and water vapor fluxes over four forests in two contrasting climatic zones. Agric. For. Meteorol., 2013, 180, 211–224.
  • Carrara, A., Janssens, I. A., Yuste, J. C. and Ceulemans, R., Seasonal changes in photosynthesis, respiration and NEE of a mixed temperate forest. Agric. For. Meteorol., 2004, 126, 15–31.
  • Valentini, R. et al., Respiration as the main determinant of carbon balance in European forests. Nature, 2000, 404, 861–865.
  • Giardina, C. P. and Ryan, M. G., Evidence that decomposition rates of organic carbon in mineral soil do not vary with temperature. Nature, 2000, 404, 858–861.
  • Krishna, M. P. and Mohan, M., Litter decomposition in forest ecosystems: a review. Energ. Ecol. Environ., 2017, 2, 236–249.
  • Mahanta, R., Sarma, D. and Choudhury, A., Heavy rainfall occurrences in northeast India. Int. J. Climatol., 2013, 33, 1456–1469.
  • Sarma, D., Baruah, K. K., Baruah, R., Gogoi, N., Bora, A., Chakraborty, S. and Karipot, A., Carbon dioxide, water vapour and energy fluxes over a semi-evergreen forest in Assam, Northeast India. J. Earth Syst. Sci., 2018, 127(7).
  • Deb Burman, P. K., Sarma, D., Williams, M., Karipot, A. and Chakraborty, S., Estimating gross primary productivity of a tropical forest ecosystem over north-east India using LAI and meteorological variables. J. Earth Syst. Sci., 2017, 126.
  • Rodda, S. R., Thumaty, K. C., Jha, C. S. and Dadhwal, V. K., Seasonal variations of carbondioxide, water vapor and energy fluxes in tropical Indian mangroves. Forests, 2016, 7(35).
  • Lasslop, G. et al., Separation of net ecosystem exchange into assimilation and respiration using a light response curve approach: critical issues and global evaluation. Global Change Biol., 2010, 16, 187–208.
  • Falge, E. et al., Gap filling strategies for defensible annual sums of net ecosystem exchange. Agric. For. Meteorol., 2001, 107, 43–69.
  • Lloyd, J. and Taylor, J. A., On the temperature dependence of soil respiration. Funct. Ecol., 1994, 8(3), 315–323.
  • Reichstein, M. et al., On the separation of net ecosystem exchange into assimilation and ecosystem respiration: review and improved algorithm. Global Change Biol., 2005, 11, 1424–1439.
  • Korner, C., Leaf diffusive conductances in the major vegetation types of the globe. In Ecophysiology of Photosynthesis (eds Schulze, E. D. and Caldwell, M. M.), Springer, Berlin, 1995, pp. 463–490.
  • Thomas, M. V. et al., Carbondioxide fluxes over an ancient broadleaved deciduous woodland in southern England. Biogeosciences, 2011, 8, 1595–1613.
  • Heinemeyer, A., Hartley, I. P., Evans, S. P., Fuente, J. A. and Ineson, P., Forest soil CO2 flux: uncovering the contribution and environmental responses of ectomycorrhizas. Global Change Biol., 2007, 13, 1786–1797.
  • Veenendaal, E., Kolle, O. and Lloyd, J., Seasonal variation in energy fluxes and carbondioxide exchange for a broad-leaved semi-arid savanna (Mopane woodland) in Southern Africa. Global Change Biol., 2004, 10, 318–328.
  • Pandey, R. R., Sharma, G., Singh, T. B. and Tripathi, S. K., Factors influencing soil CO2 efflux in a northeastern Indian oak forest and plantation. Afr. J. Plant Sci., 2010, 4, 280–289.
  • Sheikh, M. A., Kumar, M. and Bussmann, R. W., Altitudinal variation in soil organic carbon stock in coniferous subtropical and broadleaf temperate forests in Garhwal Himalaya. Carbon Balance Manage., 2009, 4(6).

Abstract Views: 342

PDF Views: 110




  • Impact of Ecosystem Respiration on Carbon Balance in a Semi-Evergreen Forest of Northeast India

Abstract Views: 342  |  PDF Views: 110

Authors

Dipankar Sarma
Department of Environmental Science, Tezpur University, Tezpur 784 028, India
Kushal Kumar Baruah
Department of Environmental Science, Tezpur University, Tezpur 784 028, India
Supriyo Chakraborty
Indian Institute of Tropical Meteorology, Pune 411 008, India
Anand Karipot
Savitribai Phule Pune University, Pune 411 007, India
Rulee Baruah
Prince of Wales Institute of Engineering and Technology, Jorhat 785 001, India

Abstract


We have estimated in this study the annual net ecosystem productivity (NEP) of Kaziranga National Park by using real-time eddy covariance data. We partitioned the net CO2 flux into gross primary productivity and ecosystem respiration (Re) using standardized method. Estimated annual NEP of the ecosystem 92.93 ± 1.7 g C m–2 year–1 indicated that the forest is a moderate sink of CO2 and is reported for the first time from a forest of Northeast India.

Keywords


Eddy Covariance, Gross Primary Productivity, Net Ecosystem Productivity.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv116%2Fi5%2F751-757