Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Nutrient Composition, Glucosinolate and Vinyl-Oxazolidine-Thione Profiling of Indian Rapeseed (Brassica juncea Coss.) Meal


Affiliations
1 Research and Development Centre (Animal Nutrition), Indo Gulf Fertilisers, Jagdishpur, Amethi 227 817, India
 

Presence of antinutritional factor(s) in any feedstuff impedes effective nutrient utilization by animals, besides causing specific adverse effects. This study includes eighteen different batches of Indian rapeseed (Brassica juncea Coss.) meal (RSM) sampled over a period of nine months for their evaluation in terms of nutrient composition, glucosinolate (GL) and vinyloxazolidine- thione (VOT) concentrations. Results showed that RSM contained a mean value (on dry basis) of crude protein (36.7%), ether extract (1.1%), ash (7.6%), crude fibre (10%), neutral detergent fibre (25%), acid detergent fibre (16.5%), hemicellulose (8.6%), total carbohydrates (54.7%), non-fibrous carbohydrates (29.7%), total digestible nutrients (77.9%) and metabolizable energy (11.7 MJ/kg). Furthermore, antinutritional factors like GL (μmol/g) and VOT (mg/g) are presented to be in the range of 36.2–72.2 (mean: 52) and 0–3.2 (mean: 1.0) respectively. Based on the species-wise tolerance limit for GL, the optimum inclusion level of RSM recommended for ruminants, pigs, rabbits, rats, poultry and fish is 15.6%, 1.5%, 13.5%, 1%, 10.4% and 6.9% respectively. Results of the present study are expected to maximize precision ration balancing for enhanced nutrient utilization whilst also curtailing any possible adverse effects of GL and VOT on production performance of animals.

Keywords

Antinutrients, Glucosinolates, NIRS, Protein Feeding, Rapeseed Meal.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Heuzé, V., Tran, G., Sauvant, D., Lessire, M. and Lebas, F., Rapeseed meal. In Feedipedia, a programme by INRA, CIRAD, AFZ and FAO, 2017; http://www.feedipedia.org/node/52 (accessed on 20 November 2017).
  • Mahesh, M. S., Thakur, S. S., Kumar, R., Malik, T. A. and Gami, R., Nitrogen fractionation of certain conventional- and lesserknown by-products for ruminants. Anim. Nutr., 2017, 3, 186–190.
  • Tayo, T., Dutta, N. and Sharma, K., Effect of feeding canola quality rapeseed mustard meal on animal production – a review. Agric. Rev., 2012, 33, 114–121.
  • Mejicanos, G., Sanjayan, N., Kim, I. H. and Nyachoti, C. M., Recent advances in canola meal utilisation in swine nutrition. J. Anim. Sci. Technol., 2016, 58, 7.
  • Niu, Y., Jiang, M., Guo, M., Wan, C., Hu, S., Jin, H. and Huang, F., Characterisation of the factors that influence sinapine concentration in rapeseed meal during fermentation. PLoS ONE, 2015; doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0116470
  • Tripathi, M. K. and Mishra, A. S., Glucosinolates in animal nutrition: a review. Anim. Feed. Sci. Technol., 2007, 132, 1–27.
  • Tyagi, A. K., Influence of water soaking of mustard cake on glucosinolate hydrolysis. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., 2002, 99, 215–219.
  • Tripathi, M. K., Agrawal, I. S., Sharma, S. D. and Mishra, D. P., Effect of substitution of soybean meal with treated or untreated high glucosinolate mustard (Brassica juncea) meal on intake, digestibility, growth performance and body composition of calves. Anim. Feed. Sci. Technol., 2001, 94, 137–146.
  • Li, P. L. et al., Determination of the energy content and amino acid digestibility of double-low rapeseed cakes fed to growing pigs. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., 2015, 210, 243–253.
  • NRC, Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle, National Academy Press, Washington DC, USA, 2001, 7th rev edn.
  • Owens, F. N., Sapienza, D. A. and Hassen, A. T., Effect of nutrient composition of feeds on digestibility of organic matter by cattle: a review. J. Anim. Sci., 2010, 88(E. Suppl.), E151–E169.
  • Sharma, V. C., Mahesh, M. S., Mohini, M., Datt, C. and Nampoothiri, V. M., Nutrient utilisation and methane emissions in Sahiwal calves differing in residual feed intake. Arch. Anim. Nutr., 2014, 68, 345–357.
  • BIS, Bureau of Indian Standards. Specification for mustard and rapeseed oilcake as livestock feed ingredient. Reaffirmed IS:1932, 1986, 1996.
  • Krishnamoorthy, U., Solle, H., Steingass, H. and Menke, K. H., Energy and protein evaluation of tropical feedstuffs for whole tract and ruminal digestion by chemical analyses and rumen inoculum studies in vitro. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., 1995, 52, 177–188.
  • Jayanthi, V., Ravi, R., Natarajan, A. and Chandrasekeran, D., Rapeseed meal as a protein source for broilers. Indian J. Anim. Nutr., 2006, 23, 131–133.
  • Das, L. K., Kundu, S. S., Kumar, D. and Datt, C., Assessment of energy content of some tropical concentrate feeds of ruminants using model of National Research Council-2001. Indian J. Sci. Technol., 2014, 7, 1999–2006.
  • Swanepoel, N., Robinson, P. H. and Erasmus, L. J., Impacts of adding ruminally protected phenylalanine to rations containing high levels of canola meal on performance of high producing Holstein cows. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., 2016, 216, 108–120.
  • Kathirvelan, C. and Tyagi, A. K., Conjugated linoleic acid content of milk from buffaloes fed a mustard oil-based diet. Int. J. Dairy Technol., 2009, 62, 141–146.
  • Anil Kumar, G. K., Panwar, V. S., Yadav, K. R. and Sihag, S., Mustard cake as a source of dietary protein for growing lambs. Small Rumin. Res., 2002, 44, 47–51.
  • Torres-Pitarch, A. et al., The inclusion of rapeseed meal in fattening pig diets, as a partial replacer of soybean meal, alters nutrient digestion, faecal composition and biochemical methane potential from faeces. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., 2014, 198, 215–223.
  • Schöne, F., Tischendorf, F., Leiterer, M., Hartung, H. and Bargholz, J., Effects of rapeseed-press cake glucosinolates and iodine on the performance, the thyroid gland and the liver vitamin A status of pigs. Arch. Anim. Nutr., 2001, 55, 333–350.
  • Gasmi-Boubaker, A., Abdouli, H., El Hichi, M., Faiza, K. and Tayachi, L., Feeding rapeseed meal to rabbits: digestibility, performance and carcass characteristics. Asian J. Anim. Vet. Adv., 2007, 2, 38–41.
  • Bjerg, B., Eggum, B. B., Jacobsen, I., Otte, J. and Sorensen, H., Antinutritional and toxic effects in rats of individual glucosinolates (±myrosinase) added to standard diet. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr., 1989, 61, 227–244.
  • Vermorel, M., Davicco, M. J. and Evrard, J., Valorisation of rapeseed meal. Part 3. Effects of glucosinolate content on food intake, weight gain, live weight and plasma thyroid hormone levels in growing rats. Reprod. Nutr. Dev., 1987, 27, 57–66.
  • Ward, A. K., Classen, H. L. and Buchanan, F. C., Fishy-egg tainting is recessively inherited when brown-shelled layers are fed canola meal. Poultry Sci., 2009, 88, 714–721.
  • Hertrampf, J. W. and Piedad-Pascual, F., Handbook on Ingredients for Aquaculture Feeds, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, the Netherlands, 2000.
  • Luo, Y., Ai, Q., Mai, K., Zhang, W., Xu, W. and Zhang, Y., Effects of dietary rapeseed meal on growth performance, digestion and protein metabolism in relation to gene expression of juvenile cobia (Rachycentron canadum). Aquaculture, 2012, 368–369, 109–116.

Abstract Views: 287

PDF Views: 121




  • Nutrient Composition, Glucosinolate and Vinyl-Oxazolidine-Thione Profiling of Indian Rapeseed (Brassica juncea Coss.) Meal

Abstract Views: 287  |  PDF Views: 121

Authors

M. S. Mahesh
Research and Development Centre (Animal Nutrition), Indo Gulf Fertilisers, Jagdishpur, Amethi 227 817, India
S. P. Tripathi
Research and Development Centre (Animal Nutrition), Indo Gulf Fertilisers, Jagdishpur, Amethi 227 817, India
Prashant M. Puri
Research and Development Centre (Animal Nutrition), Indo Gulf Fertilisers, Jagdishpur, Amethi 227 817, India

Abstract


Presence of antinutritional factor(s) in any feedstuff impedes effective nutrient utilization by animals, besides causing specific adverse effects. This study includes eighteen different batches of Indian rapeseed (Brassica juncea Coss.) meal (RSM) sampled over a period of nine months for their evaluation in terms of nutrient composition, glucosinolate (GL) and vinyloxazolidine- thione (VOT) concentrations. Results showed that RSM contained a mean value (on dry basis) of crude protein (36.7%), ether extract (1.1%), ash (7.6%), crude fibre (10%), neutral detergent fibre (25%), acid detergent fibre (16.5%), hemicellulose (8.6%), total carbohydrates (54.7%), non-fibrous carbohydrates (29.7%), total digestible nutrients (77.9%) and metabolizable energy (11.7 MJ/kg). Furthermore, antinutritional factors like GL (μmol/g) and VOT (mg/g) are presented to be in the range of 36.2–72.2 (mean: 52) and 0–3.2 (mean: 1.0) respectively. Based on the species-wise tolerance limit for GL, the optimum inclusion level of RSM recommended for ruminants, pigs, rabbits, rats, poultry and fish is 15.6%, 1.5%, 13.5%, 1%, 10.4% and 6.9% respectively. Results of the present study are expected to maximize precision ration balancing for enhanced nutrient utilization whilst also curtailing any possible adverse effects of GL and VOT on production performance of animals.

Keywords


Antinutrients, Glucosinolates, NIRS, Protein Feeding, Rapeseed Meal.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv116%2Fi5%2F838-841