Current Science

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Resolution Enhancement for Geoelectrical Layer Interpretation of Electrical Resistivity Model from Composite Dataset:Implication from Physical Model Studies


Affiliations
1 CSIR-National Geophysical Research Institute, Hyderabad 500 007, India
 

Besides the high resolution offered by HERT, the resistivity models obtained using different electrode arrays differ significantly in geological structure and resistivity range. We combine the apparent resistivity data from multiple arrays to provide single resistivity model of high resolution as ‘composite method’. Initially, the method was tested on physical model data obtained over horizontal marble sheet kept in water. The parameters of target (resistivity, geometry, thickness) noticed in the resistivity model corresponding to composite method are appropriately matching with the true parameters. Finally, the method was applied to the data from Mahabubnagar, Telangana, India for groundwater studies. The resistivity model obtained using the proposed method has shown good match with regional hydro-geology and borehole data. The results from physical model as well as field data suggest plausible resolution enhancement in composite methodology for resolving thin layer(s) in 2D and 3D electrical resistivity tomography and induced polarization (IP) studies.

Keywords

Electrical Resistivity Tomography, Groundwater, Induced Polarization, Physical Model Studies, Resolution Enhancement.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Griffiths, D. H., Turnbull, J. and Olayinka, A. I., Two-dimensional resistivity mapping with a computer-controlled array. First Break, 1990, 8(4), 121–129.

  • Panissod, C., Dabas, M., Hesse, A., Jolivet, A., Tabbagh, J. and Tabbagh, A., Recent developments in shallow depth electrical and electrostatic prospecting using mobile arrays. Geophysics, 1998, 65, 1542–1550.

  • Loke, M. H. and Lane Jr, J. W., Inversion of data from electrical resistivity imaging surveys in water-covered areas. Explor. Geophys., 2004, 35, 266–271.

  • Loke, M. H., Tutorial: 2-D and 3-D electrical imaging surveys. 2001; http://www.geoelectrical.com (accessed on 13 March 2001).

  • Griffiths, D. H. and Barker, R. D., Two-dimensional resistivity imaging modeling in areas of complex geology. J. Appl. Geophys., 1993, 29, 211–226.

  • Loke, M. H. and Barker, R. D., Practical techniques for 3D resistivity surveys and data inversion. Geophys. Prospect., 1996, 44, 499–523.

  • Bhattacharya, P. K. and Patra, H. P., Direct Current Geo-electric Sounding, Principles and Interpretation, Elsevier, New York, USA, 1968.

  • Apparao, A., Reddy, B. S. and Sarma, V. S., Comparison of electrode arrays in induced polarisation and resistivity profiling. Geoviews, 1981, 9, 405–418.

  • Evjen, H. M., Depth factor and resolving power of electrical measurements. Geophysics, 1938, 3, 78–95.

  • Carpenter, E. W., Some notes concerning the Wenner configuration. Geophys. Prospect., 1955, 3, 388–402.

  • Carpenter, E. W. and Habberjam, G. M., A tri-potential method of resistivity prospecting. Geophysics, 1956, 21, 455–469.

  • Frohlich, R. K., The depth penetration of dipole arrays compared with Schlumberger arrangement. Geoexploration, 1967, 5, 195–204.

  • Apparao, A. and Roy, A., Resistivity model experiments. Geoexploration, 1971, 7, 45–54.

  • Apparao, A. and Roy, A., Resistivity model experiments II. Geoexploration, 1971, 9, 195–206.

  • Apparao, A. and Roy, A., Field results for direct current resistivity profiling with two-electrode array. Geoexploration, 1973, 11, 21–44.

  • Roy, A. and Apparao, A., Depth of investigation in direct current methods. Geophysics, 1971, 36(5), 943–959.

  • Roy, A., Depth of investigation in Wenner, three-electrode and dipole resistivity methods. Geophys. Prospect., 1972, 20, 329–340.

  • Roy, A. and Jain, S. C., Comparative field performance of electrode arrays in time-domain induced polarisation profiling. Geophys. Prospect., 1973, 42, 624–634.

  • Apparao, A., Srinivas, G. S. and Subrahmanya Sarma, V., Modelling results on modified pseudo-depth sections in exploration of highly resistive targets-II. PAGEOPH, 1977, 150, 341–352.

  • Apparao, A., Reddy, B. S. and Sarma, V. S., Model tank experiments on comparative performance of different electrode arrays in IP and resistivity profiling. In Symposium on Exploration Geophysics in India, 1945–78, Geological Survey of India, Calcutta, 1978.

  • Apparao, A. and Sarma, V. S., The modified pseudo-depth section as a tool in resistivity and IP prospecting – a case history. PAGEOPH, 1983, 121, 91–108.

  • Saydam, A. S. and Duckworth, K., Comparison of some electrode arrays for their IP and apparent resistivity responses over a sheetlike target. Geoexploration, 1978, 16, 267–291.

  • Sarma, V. S., Srinivas, G. S. and Joshi, M. S., Physical modeling results on modified pseudo-depth sections in exploration of highly resistive targets – II. PAGEOPH, 2001, 158, 813–820.

  • Oldenburg, D. W. and Li, Y., Estimating depth of investigation in DC resistivity and IP surveys. Geophysics, 1999, 64, 403–416.

  • Szalai, S., Novák, A. and Szarka, László, Depth of investigation and vertical resolution of geoelectric arrays. J. Environ. Eng. Geophys., 2009, 14(1), 15–23.

  • Lane Jr, J. W., Day-Lewis, F. D., Loke, M. H., Eric, A. and White, E. A., Pitfalls in inversion and interpretation of continuous resistivity profiling data – effects of resolution limitations and measurement error (abs.): EOS Trans., Am. Geophys. Union (Fall Meeting Suppl.), 2005, 86(52), abstract H43F-0546.

  • Patella, D., Introduction to ground surface self-potential tomography. Geophys. Prospect., 1997, 45, 653–681.

  • Mauriello, P., Monna, D. and Patella, D., 3D geoelectric tomography and archaeological applications. Geophys. Prospect., 1998, 46, 543–570.

  • Mauriello, P. and Patella, D., Resistivity anomaly imaging by probability tomography. Geophys. Prospect., 1999, 47, 411–429.

  • Barker, R. D., Depth of investigation of collinear symmetrical four-electrode arrays. Geophysics, 1989, 54(8), 1031–1037.

  • Rajesh, R., Padmavathi Devi, P., Sarma, V. S. and Rajendra Prasad, P., Electrical resistivity imaging over natural (in situ) geological samples using physical model studies. Arab. J. Geosci., 2013, 7(11), 4717–4725; doi:10.1007/s12517-013-1101-4.

  • Kumar, D. et al., Mapping lithology and assessing recharge characteristics in a granitic hard rock aquifer: inference from 2D resistivity, induced polarization, tracer and moisture measurements. J. Geol. Soc. India, 2016, 88(1), 29–38.


Abstract Views: 341

PDF Views: 136




  • Resolution Enhancement for Geoelectrical Layer Interpretation of Electrical Resistivity Model from Composite Dataset:Implication from Physical Model Studies

Abstract Views: 341  |  PDF Views: 136

Authors

Rajesh Rekapalli
CSIR-National Geophysical Research Institute, Hyderabad 500 007, India
Dewashish Kumar
CSIR-National Geophysical Research Institute, Hyderabad 500 007, India
V. S. Sarma
CSIR-National Geophysical Research Institute, Hyderabad 500 007, India

Abstract


Besides the high resolution offered by HERT, the resistivity models obtained using different electrode arrays differ significantly in geological structure and resistivity range. We combine the apparent resistivity data from multiple arrays to provide single resistivity model of high resolution as ‘composite method’. Initially, the method was tested on physical model data obtained over horizontal marble sheet kept in water. The parameters of target (resistivity, geometry, thickness) noticed in the resistivity model corresponding to composite method are appropriately matching with the true parameters. Finally, the method was applied to the data from Mahabubnagar, Telangana, India for groundwater studies. The resistivity model obtained using the proposed method has shown good match with regional hydro-geology and borehole data. The results from physical model as well as field data suggest plausible resolution enhancement in composite methodology for resolving thin layer(s) in 2D and 3D electrical resistivity tomography and induced polarization (IP) studies.

Keywords


Electrical Resistivity Tomography, Groundwater, Induced Polarization, Physical Model Studies, Resolution Enhancement.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv116%2Fi8%2F1356-1362