Current Science

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Above-And Below-Ground Biomass Production in Pinus roxburghii Forests along Altitudes in Garhwal Himalaya, India


Affiliations
1 Department of Forestry, HNB Garhwal University, Srinagar-Garhwal 249 161, India
2 Department of Informatics, Forest Research Institute, Dehradun 248 003, India
 

Chir pine (Pinus roxburghii Sargent) stands were selected across their distributional range from Himalaya, i.e. from lower altitude to upper altitude to understand distribution of chir tree density, basal cover and biomass with altitudes. Tree density was highest >1800 m (405 ind ha–1) and lowest (171.67 ind ha–1) between 1401 and 1800 m. Tree height was highest (23.69 m) between 1001 and 1400 m and lowest (17.71 m) >1800 m. Basal area was highest (30.51 m2 ha–1) between 1001 and 1400 m and lowest (17.16 m2 ha–1) between 1401 and 1800 m. The highest volume was observed between 1001 and 1400 m altitude and lowest between 1401 and 1800 m. Bole biomass was highest (145.51 t ha–1) between 1001 and 1400 m and lowest (80.78 t ha–1) between 1401 and 1800 m. The mean leaf litter biomass production was highest in summer and showed decreasing trend in winter to rainy seasons, except in Rudraprayag where the highest biomass was observed in summer and regressed from rainy to winter seasons. The study concluded that, the density, height, basal area and volume of Pinus roxburgii trees varied with altitude in the Himalaya, but it is not directional. Density of trees plays an important role which changes biomass accordingly. Litter production had inverse relation with altitude, however increase in biomass of litter at >1801 m was observed due to new plantations.

Keywords

Carbon, Conifers, Greenhouse Gas, Pure Forest, REDD+.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Upadhyay, T. P., Sankhayan, P. L. and Solberg, B., A review of carbon sequestration dynamics in the Himalayan region as a function of land-use change and forest/soil degradation with special reference to Nepal. Agric. Ecosys. Environ., 2005, 105, 449–465.

  • Tollefso, J., IPCC says limiting global warming to 1.5°C will require drastic action. Nature, 2018, 562, 172–173; doi:10.1038/d41586-018-06876-2.

  • Peichl, M. and Arain, M. A., Above- and belowground ecosystem biomass and carbon pools in an age-sequence of temperate pine plantation forests. Agric. For. Meteorol., 2006, 140, 51–63.

  • Taylor, A. R., Wang, J. R. and Chen, H. Y., Carbon storage in a chronosequence of red spruce (Picea rubens) forests in central Nova Scotia, Canada. Can. J. For. Res., 2007, 37, 2260–2269.

  • Thomas, S. C. and Martin, A. R., Carbon content of tree tissues: a synthesis. Forests, 2012, 3, 332–352.

  • Kishwan, J., Pandey, R. and Dadhwal, V. K., Emission removal capability of India’s forest and tree cover. Small Scale Forest., 2012, 11(1), 61–72.

  • FAO, Global Forest Resources Assessment 2015. FAO Forestry Paper No. 1. UN Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome, 2015.

  • Gruneberg, E., Ziche, D. and Wellbrock, N., Organic carbon stocks and sequestration rates of forests soils in Germany. Global Change Biol., 2014, 20, 2644–2662.

  • Sedjo, R. A., Forest carbon sequestration: some issues for forest investments. In Resources for the Future, Discussion Paper 01-34, Washington, DC, USA, 2001, p. 26.

  • Alemu, B., The role of forest and soil carbon sequestrations on climate change mitigation. J. Environ. Earth Sci., 2014, 14(13), 98–111; www.iiste.org

  • FAO, Global Forest Resources Assessment; Progress towards Sustainable Forest Management; FAO Forestry Paper 147, Food and Agricultural Organization, Rome, Italy, 2006.

  • Ralhan, P. K., Khanna, R. K., Singh, S. P. and Singh, J. S., Phonological characteristics of the tree layer of Kumaun Himalaya forests. Vegetation, 1985, 60, 90-101.

  • Gupta, B., Mehta, R. and Mishra, V. K., Fire ecology of ground vegetation in Pinus roxburghii sargent plantations in North-West Himalaya-floristic composition and species diversity. Caspian J. Environ. Sci., 2009, 7(2), 71–78.

  • Ghildiyal, S. K., Sharma, C. M. and Gairola, S., Environmental variation in seed and seedling characteristics of Pinus roxburghii Sarg. from Uttarakhand, India. Appl. Ecol. Environ. Res., 2009, 7(2), 121–129.

  • Farjon, A., Pinus roxburghii. In IUCN Red List of Threatened Species, 2013; www.iucnredlist.org (accessed on 5 April 2014).

  • Pandey, R., Rawat, G. S. and Kishwan, J., Changes in distribution of carbon in various forest types of India from 1995–2005. Silva Lusitana, 2011, 19(1), 41–54.

  • Sharma, S. K. and Verma, S. K., Influence of season on the ischolar_maining response of chir pine (Pinus roxburghii Sarg.). Ann. For. Res., 2011, 54(2), 241–247.

  • Amatya, S. M., Nepal Forestry Handbook, FAO, Italy, Rome, 2002.

  • FSI, State of Forest Report, Ministry of Environment and Forests, Government of India, Forest Survey of India, Dehradun, 2013.

  • Jianmin, X. and Zhing, W. U., Economic benefit analysis of carbon sequestration of five typical forest types in Beijing Miyun watershed. Chinese Forst. Sci. Technol., 2007, 6(1), 57-–61.

  • FSI State of Forest Report Forest Survey of India, Ministry of Environment and Forests, Government of India, Dehradun, 2009.

  • Hairiah, K., Sitompul, S. M., Noordwijk and Palm, M., Methodology for sampling carbon stocks above and below ground. ASB Lecture Notes 4B. International Centre for Research in Agro forestry, Indonesia, 2001; http://www.icraf.cgiar.org/sea

  • Pressler, M., Das Gesetz der Stambildung Leipzig, 1895, p. 153.

  • Bitlerlich, W., The Relaskop Idea Slough, Commonwealth Agricultural Bureause, Farnham Royal, England, 1984.

  • Koul, D. N. and Panwar, P., Prioritizing land-management options for carbon sequestration potential. Curr. Sci., 2008, 95, 658–663.

  • Chidumaya, E. N., Aboveground woody biomass structure and productivity in a zambezian woodland. For. Ecol. Manage., 1990, 36, 33–46.

  • Woomer, P. L., Impact of cultivation of carbon fluxes in woody savannas of southern Africa. Water Air Soil Pollut., 1999, 70, 403–412.

  • Dadhwal, V. K., Pandya, N. and Vora, A. B., Carbon Cycle for Indian Forest Ecosystem – A Preliminary Estimate, Global Change Studies, Scientific Results from ISRO Geosphere Biosphere Programme, India, ISRO, 1998, pp. 411–429.

  • Sharma, S. and Rikhari, H. C., Forest fire in the central Himalaya: climate and recovery of trees. Int. J. Biometeor., 1997, 40, 63–70.

  • Savage, S. M., Mechanism of fire-induce water repellency in soil. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc., 1974, 38, 652–657.

  • Gonza´lez-Pe´reza, J. A., Francisco, J. G.-V., Gonzalo, A. and Heike, K., The effect of fire on soil organic matter – a review. Environ. Int., 2004, 30, 855–870.

  • Rashid, G. H., Effect of fire on soil carbon and nitrogen in a Mediterranean oak forest of Ageria. Plant Soil, 1987, 103, 89–93.

  • Sheikh, M. A., Kumar, M. and Bussmann, R. W., Altitudinal variation in soil organic carbon stock in coniferous subtropical and broadleaf temperate forests in Garhwal Himalaya. Carbon Balance Manage., 2009; doi:l0.118611750-0680-4-6.

  • Gairola, S., Rawal, R. S. and Todaria, N. P., Forest vegetation patterns along an altitudinal gradient in sub-alpine zone of West Himalaya, India. Afric. J. Plant Sci., 2008, 2(6), 42–48.

  • Haripriya, G. S., Estimates of biomass in Indian forester. Biome. Bioenerg., 2000, 19, 245–258.

  • Gairola, S., Sharma, C. M., Ghildiyal, S. K. and Suyal, S., Live tree biomass and carbon variation along an altitudinal gradient in moist temperate valley slopes of the Garhwal Himalaya (India). Curr. Sci., 2011, 100(12), 1862–1870.

  • Sharma, C. M., Baduni, N. P., Gairola, S., Ghildiyal, S. K. and Suyal, S., Tree diversity and carbon stocks of some major forest types of Garhwal Himalaya, India. For. Ecol. Manage., 2010, 260(12), 2170–2179.

  • Kumar, S. and Tewari, L. M., Pattern of litter fall in Pinus roxburghii Sarg. forest in Kumaun Himalaya, India. Indian J. Ecol., 2015, 42(1), 219–223.


Abstract Views: 392

PDF Views: 114




  • Above-And Below-Ground Biomass Production in Pinus roxburghii Forests along Altitudes in Garhwal Himalaya, India

Abstract Views: 392  |  PDF Views: 114

Authors

Munesh Kumar
Department of Forestry, HNB Garhwal University, Srinagar-Garhwal 249 161, India
Rahul Kumar
Department of Forestry, HNB Garhwal University, Srinagar-Garhwal 249 161, India
Bobbymoore Konsam
Department of Forestry, HNB Garhwal University, Srinagar-Garhwal 249 161, India
Mehraj A. Sheikh
Department of Forestry, HNB Garhwal University, Srinagar-Garhwal 249 161, India
Rajiv Pandey
Department of Informatics, Forest Research Institute, Dehradun 248 003, India

Abstract


Chir pine (Pinus roxburghii Sargent) stands were selected across their distributional range from Himalaya, i.e. from lower altitude to upper altitude to understand distribution of chir tree density, basal cover and biomass with altitudes. Tree density was highest >1800 m (405 ind ha–1) and lowest (171.67 ind ha–1) between 1401 and 1800 m. Tree height was highest (23.69 m) between 1001 and 1400 m and lowest (17.71 m) >1800 m. Basal area was highest (30.51 m2 ha–1) between 1001 and 1400 m and lowest (17.16 m2 ha–1) between 1401 and 1800 m. The highest volume was observed between 1001 and 1400 m altitude and lowest between 1401 and 1800 m. Bole biomass was highest (145.51 t ha–1) between 1001 and 1400 m and lowest (80.78 t ha–1) between 1401 and 1800 m. The mean leaf litter biomass production was highest in summer and showed decreasing trend in winter to rainy seasons, except in Rudraprayag where the highest biomass was observed in summer and regressed from rainy to winter seasons. The study concluded that, the density, height, basal area and volume of Pinus roxburgii trees varied with altitude in the Himalaya, but it is not directional. Density of trees plays an important role which changes biomass accordingly. Litter production had inverse relation with altitude, however increase in biomass of litter at >1801 m was observed due to new plantations.

Keywords


Carbon, Conifers, Greenhouse Gas, Pure Forest, REDD+.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv116%2Fi9%2F1506-1514