Current Science

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Role of Smallholder Tea Growers in Carbon Sink Management


Affiliations
1 Department of Ecology and Environmental Science, Assam University, Silchar 788 011, India
 

One-fourth of the total tea production in India comes from smallholder tea estates, thus signifying the importance of this land use in biomass carbon management. As small-scale tea plantation management provides livelihood security to the growers, they prefer to manage such plantation over a long period of time and therefore maintaining a permanent sink of carbon. In the present study from Barak Valley part of North East India, such smallholder plantations were assessed for carbon stock in tea bushes, shade trees and soil compartment. Allometric equation for tea plants developed from this region was used for estimation of biomass carbon stock in tea bushes, while species-specific volume equations were used for shade trees. Carbon stock of biomass, litter layer and soil compartment in smallholder tea plantations were estimated as 30.50 Mg, 5.54 Mg and 122.17 ± 9.82 Mg C ha–1 up to 1 m depth respectively. Shade tree compartment contributed a dominant proportion (56.37%) of biomass and carbon stock compared to tea bushes (25.46%) and litter layer (18.17%). Collectively soil compartment holds maximum proportion (80%) of carbon stock followed by shade tree (11%), tea bush (5%) and litter (4%) compartments in the system. Comparatively carbon stock in smallholder tea estate is lower than many of the tropical and subtropical forestry and agroforestry systems. Nonetheless, the former sustains the livelihood of million of farmers across the tropical world and simultaneously maintains a permanent sink of carbon. Further studies are required to better understand the tea agroforestry arrangement to promote sink capability of smallholder tea estates.

Keywords

Biomass Carbon Stock, Climate Change Mitigation, Phytosociology, Smallholder Tea Growers.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Le Quere, C. et al., Global carbon budget 2015. Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 2015, 7, 349–396.

  • Dlugokencky, E. and Tans, P., Trends in atmospheric carbon dioxide. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Earth System Research Laboratory (NOAA/ESRL), USA; http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/ccgg/trends (last accessed on 26 July 2016).

  • Houghton, R. A., Balancing the global carbon budget. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci., 2007, 35, 313–347.

  • Kumar, B. M. and Nair, P. K. R. (eds), Carbon Sequestration Potential of Agroforestry Systems, Springer, The Netherlands, 2011.

  • Tea Board of India, Tea statistics. Ministry of Commerce & Industry, Government of India, 2014; http://teaboard.gov.in (accessed on 17 January 2015).

  • Das, T. and Das, A. K., Mapping and identification of homegardens as a component of the trees outside forests using remote sensing and geographic information system. J. Indian Soc. Remote Sensing, 2013, 42, 233–242.

  • Committee on Commodity Problems, Contribution of smallholders to the tea sub-sector and policies required to enhance their livelihood. In Intergovernmental Group on Tea (CCP: TE 12/4, pp. 1–6). 20th Session, Colombo, Sri Lanka, 30 January–1 February 2012.

  • Onduru, D. D., De Jager, A., Hiller, S. and Van den Bosch, R., Sustainability of smallholder tea production in developing countries: learning experiences from farmer field schools in Kenya. Int. J. Dev. Sustain., 2012, 1, 714–742.

  • Dawson, I. K. et al., Trees, tree genetic resources and the livelihoods of rural communities in the tropics. In Thematic Study for the State of the World’s Forest Genetic Resources. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy, 2013.

  • Koul, D. N. and Panwar, P., Prioritizing land management options for carbon sequestration potential. Curr. Sci., 2008, 95, 658– 663.

  • Wijeratne, T. L., De Costa, W. A. J. M. and Wijeratne, M. A., Carbon sequestration potential of tea plantations in Sri Lanka. In Conference paper 228th Experiment and Extension Forum, Colombo, Sri Lanka, 2014.

  • Li, S. et al., Quantifying carbon storage for tea plantations in China. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 2011, 141, 390–398.

  • Kamau, D. M., Spiertz, J. H. J. and Oenema, O., Carbon and nutrient stocks of tea plantations differing in age, genotype and plant population density. Plant Soil, 2008, 307, 29–39.

  • Kalita, R. M., Carbon storage and sequestration in tea agroforestry system in Barak Valley, Assam. Ph D thesis, Assam University, Silchar, 2015.

  • Singh, S. and Dadhwal, V. K., Vegetation Carbon Pool Assessment of India, Indian Institute of Remote Sensing, Dehradun, 2009.

  • Mayer, H. D. G., A manual and tutorial for the proper use of an increment borer. Tree Ring Res., 2003, 59, 63–79.

  • FRI, Indian Woods, Volume I–VI, Forest Research Institute, Dehradun, 1996.

  • Zanne, A. E. et al., Global Wood Density Database, Dryad, 2009; http://hdl.handle.net/10255/dryad.235.

  • FSI, Volume Equations for Forests of India, Nepal and Bhutan, Forest Survey of India, Dehradun, 1996.

  • Devagiri, G. M. et al., Assessment of above ground biomass and carbon pool in different vegetation types of south western part of Karnataka, India using spectral modeling. Trop. Ecol., 2013, 54, 149–165.

  • Ravindranath, N. H. and Ostwald, M., Carbon Inventory Methods Handbook for Greenhouse Gas Inventory, Carbon Mitigation and Roundwood Production Projects, Springer, The Netherlands, 2008.

  • IPCC, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 2007. Synthesis Report, 2007; http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar4/syr/ar4_syr.pdf (accessed on 10 May 2011).

  • Kalita, R. M., Das, A. K. and Nath, A. J., Allometric equations for estimating above and belowground biomass in tea (Camellia sinensis (L.) O. Kuntze) agroforestry system of Barak Valley, Assam, Northeast India. Biomass Bioenerg., 2015, 83, 42–49.

  • Newbould, P. J., Methods for Estimating the Primary Production of Forests, IBP Handbook No. 2. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, 1967, p. 62.

  • Velmurugan, A., Kumar, S., Kudrat, M. and Dadhwal, V. K., Spatial Assessment of Soil Carbon Pool of India, Indian Institute of Remote Sensing, Dehradun, 2009.

  • Bouyoucos, G. H., Hydrometer method improved for making particle size analyses of soils. Agron. J., 1962, 54, 464-465.

  • Brady, N. C. and Weil, R. R., The Nature and Properties of Soils, Pearson Education, New Jersey, 2008, 14th edn.

  • Chan, K. Y., Bowman, A. and Oates, A., Oxidizable organic carbon fractions and soil quality changes in an oxicpaleustalf under different pasture leys. Soil Sci., 2001, 166, 61–67.


Abstract Views: 353

PDF Views: 107




  • Role of Smallholder Tea Growers in Carbon Sink Management

Abstract Views: 353  |  PDF Views: 107

Authors

Rinku Moni Kalita
Department of Ecology and Environmental Science, Assam University, Silchar 788 011, India
Ashesh Kumar Das
Department of Ecology and Environmental Science, Assam University, Silchar 788 011, India
Arun Jyoti Nath
Department of Ecology and Environmental Science, Assam University, Silchar 788 011, India

Abstract


One-fourth of the total tea production in India comes from smallholder tea estates, thus signifying the importance of this land use in biomass carbon management. As small-scale tea plantation management provides livelihood security to the growers, they prefer to manage such plantation over a long period of time and therefore maintaining a permanent sink of carbon. In the present study from Barak Valley part of North East India, such smallholder plantations were assessed for carbon stock in tea bushes, shade trees and soil compartment. Allometric equation for tea plants developed from this region was used for estimation of biomass carbon stock in tea bushes, while species-specific volume equations were used for shade trees. Carbon stock of biomass, litter layer and soil compartment in smallholder tea plantations were estimated as 30.50 Mg, 5.54 Mg and 122.17 ± 9.82 Mg C ha–1 up to 1 m depth respectively. Shade tree compartment contributed a dominant proportion (56.37%) of biomass and carbon stock compared to tea bushes (25.46%) and litter layer (18.17%). Collectively soil compartment holds maximum proportion (80%) of carbon stock followed by shade tree (11%), tea bush (5%) and litter (4%) compartments in the system. Comparatively carbon stock in smallholder tea estate is lower than many of the tropical and subtropical forestry and agroforestry systems. Nonetheless, the former sustains the livelihood of million of farmers across the tropical world and simultaneously maintains a permanent sink of carbon. Further studies are required to better understand the tea agroforestry arrangement to promote sink capability of smallholder tea estates.

Keywords


Biomass Carbon Stock, Climate Change Mitigation, Phytosociology, Smallholder Tea Growers.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv116%2Fi9%2F1560-1566