Current Science

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

India’s Evergreen Revolution in Cereals


Affiliations
1 ICAR-Central Arid Zone Research Institute, Jodhpur 342 003, India
2 Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana 141 004, India
3 Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi 110 014, India
 

The term ‘Green Revolution’ (GR) is used to highlight an unprecedented increase in wheat production in India during 1968–72. The critics of GR allege that there is technology fatigue, especially after 1980s. The present study was undertaken to analyse the trends in productivity of major cereals and compare yield gains during the GR era and post-GR era. The period of 68 years since 1950 was divided in four phases: pre-GR era (1950–66) referred to as phase I, GR era (1967–83) as phase II, post-GR era of 1984–2000 as phase III and post-GR era of 2001–17 as phase IV. The annual rate of gain in productivity (kg/ha/yr) in each phase was estimated by linear regression. The annual gain in wheat productivity in phase III (53.1 kg/ha) was 30% higher than that in the GR era (41.0 kg/ha). In rice, the productivity gains increased consistently: annual gain in phase III (32.3 kg/ha) and phase IV (41.6 kg/ha) was 68% to 117% respectively, higher than that in the GR era (19.2 kg/ha). The rate of gain in productivity of maize and pearl millet in phases III and IV was 188–530% higher in comparison to the GR phase. The progress can largely be attributed to development and adoption of improved cultivars with higher yield potential and crop management technologies. The analysis provided conclusive evidence of India experiencing evergreen revolution in major cereals.

Keywords

Cereals, Crop Productivity, Green Revolution, Improved Cultivars.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Byerlee, D., Modern varieties, productivity and sustainability: recent experience and emerging challenges. World Dev., 1996, 24, 697– 718.

  • Singh, I. J., Rai, K. N. and Karwasrea, J. C., Regional variations in agricultural performance in India. Indian J. Agric. Econ., 1997, 52, 374–386.

  • Pingali, P. L., Green revolution: impacts, limits, and the path ahead. Proc. N.Y. Acad. Sci., 2012, 109, 12302–12308.

  • Narayanamoorthy, A., Deceleration in agricultural growth: technology fatigue or policy fatigue? Econ. Polit. Wkly, 2007, 42, 2375– 2377.

  • Singh, S. K., Saxena, R., Porwal, A., Neetu and Ray, S. S., Assessment of hailstorm damage in wheat crop using remote sensing. Curr. Sci., 2017, 112, 2095–2100.

  • Richaria, R. H. and Mishro, B., The Japonica × Indica hybridization project in rice – an attempt for increased rice production. J. Biol. Sci., 1959, 2, 35–47.

  • Dhillon, B. S. and Malhi, N. S., Maize breeding in India – retrospective analysis and prospects. Indian J. Plant Genet. Resour., 2006, 19, 327–345.

  • Yadav, O. P. et al., Genetic improvement of maize in India – retrospect and prospects. Agric. Res., 2015, 4, 325–338.

  • Yadav, O. P. and Rai, K. N., Genetic improvement of pearl millet in India. Agric. Res., 2013, 2, 275–292.


Abstract Views: 426

PDF Views: 142




  • India’s Evergreen Revolution in Cereals

Abstract Views: 426  |  PDF Views: 142

Authors

O. P. Yadav
ICAR-Central Arid Zone Research Institute, Jodhpur 342 003, India
D. V. Singh
ICAR-Central Arid Zone Research Institute, Jodhpur 342 003, India
B. S. Dhillon
Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana 141 004, India
T. Mohapatra
Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi 110 014, India

Abstract


The term ‘Green Revolution’ (GR) is used to highlight an unprecedented increase in wheat production in India during 1968–72. The critics of GR allege that there is technology fatigue, especially after 1980s. The present study was undertaken to analyse the trends in productivity of major cereals and compare yield gains during the GR era and post-GR era. The period of 68 years since 1950 was divided in four phases: pre-GR era (1950–66) referred to as phase I, GR era (1967–83) as phase II, post-GR era of 1984–2000 as phase III and post-GR era of 2001–17 as phase IV. The annual rate of gain in productivity (kg/ha/yr) in each phase was estimated by linear regression. The annual gain in wheat productivity in phase III (53.1 kg/ha) was 30% higher than that in the GR era (41.0 kg/ha). In rice, the productivity gains increased consistently: annual gain in phase III (32.3 kg/ha) and phase IV (41.6 kg/ha) was 68% to 117% respectively, higher than that in the GR era (19.2 kg/ha). The rate of gain in productivity of maize and pearl millet in phases III and IV was 188–530% higher in comparison to the GR phase. The progress can largely be attributed to development and adoption of improved cultivars with higher yield potential and crop management technologies. The analysis provided conclusive evidence of India experiencing evergreen revolution in major cereals.

Keywords


Cereals, Crop Productivity, Green Revolution, Improved Cultivars.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv116%2Fi11%2F1805-1808