Current Science

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Seismic Reduction Factor Evaluation and its Components for Steel Buildings Undergoing Nonlinear Deformations


Affiliations
1 Universidad Autonoma de Sinaloa, Culiacan, Sinaloa CP 80040
2 Universidad Autonoma de Sinaloa, Culiacan, Sinaloa CP 80040, Mexico
3 Instituto de Ingeniería, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, Ciudad de Mexico CP 04510, Mexico
4 Department of Civil Engineering and Engineering Mechanics, University of Arizona, Tucson CP 85721, Arizona, United States
 

The force reduction factor (R) and its components for steel buildings are evaluated in this study. The R factor for single-degree-of-freedom models produces non-conservative designs. The global R values can be very different than the local ones. The contribution of damping to R is much more uniformly distributed and different than that of yield, implying that the latter should not be expressed in terms of viscous damping. The value of 8 specified in the codes for R is justified only for low-rise buildings and global parameters, if viscous damping is considered. If damping is not considered, this value cannot be justified in any case, a value of 6 is recommended.

Keywords

Damping, Ductility, Force Reduction Factors, Nonlinear Deformations, Steel Buildings.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Chopra, A. K., Dynamics of Structures, Prentice Hall, New Jersey, USA, 2007.

  • Reyes-Salazar, A., Ductility and ductility reduction factors for MDOF systems. Struct. Eng. Mech., 2002, 13(4), 369–385.

  • Uang, C. M., Establishing R (or Rw) and Cd factors for building seismic provisions. J. Struct. Eng., 1991, 117(1), 19–28.

  • Tso, W. K. and Naumoski, N., Period-dependent seismic force reduction factors for short-period structure. Can. J. Civ. Eng., 1991, 18, 568–574.

  • Whittaker, A., Hart, G. and Rojahn, C., Seismic response modification factors. J. Struct. Eng., 1999, 125(4), 438–444.

  • Rai, D. C., Future trends in earthquake-resistant design. Curr. Sci., 2000, 79(9), 1291–1300.

  • Kougioumtzoglou, I. A. and Spanos, P. D., An approximate approach for nonlinear system response determination under evolutionary stochastic excitation. Curr. Sci., 2009, 97(8), 1203– 1211.

  • Sivaram, K., Gade, M., Raghukanth, S. T. G., Saikia, U. and Kanna, N., Estimation of strong ground motion in Southern Peninsular India by empirical Green’s function method. Curr. Sci., 2017, 112(11), 2273–2283.

  • ATC, Tentative provisions for the development of seismic regulation buildings. Rep. No. ATC-3-06, Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, California, USA, 1978.

  • Newmark, N. M. and Hall, W. J., Earthquake Spectra and Design Monograph Series, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Berkeley, California, USA, 1982.

  • Hadjian, A. H., An evaluation of the ductility reduction factor Q in the 1976 regulations for the Federal District of Mexico. Earthq. Eng. Struct. D, 1989, 18, 217–231.

  • Miranda, E. and Bertero, V., Evaluation of strength reduction factors for earthquake-resistant design. Earthq. Spectra., 1994, (10)2, 357–379.

  • Ordaz, M. and Pérez-Rocha, L. E., Estimation of strengthreduction factors for elastoplastic systems: a new approach. Earthq. Eng. Struct. D, 1998, 27(9), 889–901.

  • Arroyo-Espinoza, D. and Teran-Gilmore, A., Strength reduction factors for ductile structures with passive energy dissipating devices. J. Earthq. Eng., 2003, 7(2), 297–325.

  • Karmakar, D. and Gupta, V. K., Estimation of strength reduction factors via normalized pseudo-acceleration response spectrum. Earthq. Eng. Struct. D, 2007, 36(6), 751–763.

  • Reyes-Salazar A. and Haldar A., Dissipation of energy in steel frames with PR connections. Struct. Eng. Mech., 2000, 9(3), 241– 256; doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.12989/sem.2000.9.3.241.

  • Reyes-Salazar, A. and Haldar, A., Energy dissipation at PR frames under seismic loading. J. Struct. Eng., 2001, 27(5), 588–593.

  • Reyes-Salazar, A. and Haldar, A., Seismic response and energy dissipation in partially restrained and fully restrained steel frames: an analytical study. Steel Compos. Struct., 2001, 1(4), 459–480.

  • Ramirez, O. A., Constantinou, M. C., Gomez, J. D., Whittaker, A. S., Kircher, C. A., Johnson, M. W. and Chrysostomoue, C. Z., Validation of the 2000 NEHRP provisions’ equivalent lateral force and modal analysis procedures for buildings with damping systems. Earthq. Spectra, 2003, 19(4), 981–999.

  • Medina, R. and Krawinkler, H., Strength demand issues relevant for the seismic design of moment–resisting frames. Earthq Spectra, 2005, 21(2), 415–439.

  • Ganjavi, B. and Hao, H., Effect of structural characteristics distribution of strength demand and ductility reduction factor of MDOF systems considering soil–structure interaction. Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vib., 2012, 11, 205–220.

  • Reyes-Salazar, A., Bojórquez, E., Velazquez-Dimas, J. I., LópezBarraza, A. and Rivera-Salas, J. L., Ductility and ductility reduction factors for steel buildings considering different structural representations. Bull. Earthq. Eng., 2015, 13(6), 1749–1771.

  • Reyes-Salazar, A., Llanes-Tizoc, M. D., Bojórquez, J., Bojórquez, E., Lopez-Barraza, A. and Haldar, A., Force reduction factors for steel buildings with welded and post-tensioned connections. Bull. Earthq. Eng., 2016, 14(10), 2827–2858.

  • Carr, A., RUAUMOKO-inelastic dynamic analysis program, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Cantenbury, New Zealand, 2011.

  • Chen, W. F. and Atsuta, T., Interaction equations for biaxially loaded sections. Fritz Laboratory Report (72-9), Lehigh University, Pennsylvania, USA, 1971.

  • FEMA, State of the art report on systems performance of steel moment frames subjected to earthquake ground shaking, SAC Steel Project, Report 355C, Federal Emergency Management Agency, USA, 2000.

  • Assaf, A. F., Evaluation of structural over strength in steel buildings systems. Master’s thesis, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA, 1989.

  • Uang, C. M. and Bruneau, M., State-of-the-art review on seismic design of steel structures. J. Struct. Eng., 2018, 144(4), doi:10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001973.


Abstract Views: 374

PDF Views: 116




  • Seismic Reduction Factor Evaluation and its Components for Steel Buildings Undergoing Nonlinear Deformations

Abstract Views: 374  |  PDF Views: 116

Authors

Alfredo Reyes-Salazar
Universidad Autonoma de Sinaloa, Culiacan, Sinaloa CP 80040
Eden Bojórquez
Universidad Autonoma de Sinaloa, Culiacan, Sinaloa CP 80040, Mexico
Juan Bojórquez
Universidad Autonoma de Sinaloa, Culiacan, Sinaloa CP 80040, Mexico
Federico Valenzuela-Beltran
Instituto de Ingeniería, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, Ciudad de Mexico CP 04510, Mexico
J. Ramon Gaxiola-Camacho
Universidad Autonoma de Sinaloa, Culiacan, Sinaloa CP 80040, Mexico
Achintya Haldar
Department of Civil Engineering and Engineering Mechanics, University of Arizona, Tucson CP 85721, Arizona, United States

Abstract


The force reduction factor (R) and its components for steel buildings are evaluated in this study. The R factor for single-degree-of-freedom models produces non-conservative designs. The global R values can be very different than the local ones. The contribution of damping to R is much more uniformly distributed and different than that of yield, implying that the latter should not be expressed in terms of viscous damping. The value of 8 specified in the codes for R is justified only for low-rise buildings and global parameters, if viscous damping is considered. If damping is not considered, this value cannot be justified in any case, a value of 6 is recommended.

Keywords


Damping, Ductility, Force Reduction Factors, Nonlinear Deformations, Steel Buildings.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv116%2Fi11%2F1850-1860