Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Data and Ideology of Science


Affiliations
1 562 Adenwala Road, Rustom Mansion, Mumbai 400 019, India
 

A recent editorial in Nature1 urged scientists to rise above politics and restate their value to society. It is a suggestion that may work if what is of value could be agreed upon by scientists, their paymasters and ordinary citizens. Generating data or evidence-based knowledge is what scientists are supposed to do. That probably is the enduring value of science. However, to the two biggest paymasters of the scientific profession – Government and industry – that kind of value means little. Science that delivers technologies for war or profit, preferably both, is of value to them. To complicate matters, to an average citizen all data-based knowledge has now become a domain for ‘experts’. Consequently, when bad or bogus knowledge is touted as ‘scientific’ or ‘expert advice’, the value of all knowledge is undermined. Unfortunately, in the post-truth world ‘expert advice’ is often nothing but lies cloaked in bad or fraudulent statistical data. A closer examination of the ideology that drives this rampant misuse of data in the name of science is therefore necessary.
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Data and Ideology of Science

Abstract Views: 467  |  PDF Views: 171

Authors

Sumit Bhaduri
562 Adenwala Road, Rustom Mansion, Mumbai 400 019, India

Abstract


A recent editorial in Nature1 urged scientists to rise above politics and restate their value to society. It is a suggestion that may work if what is of value could be agreed upon by scientists, their paymasters and ordinary citizens. Generating data or evidence-based knowledge is what scientists are supposed to do. That probably is the enduring value of science. However, to the two biggest paymasters of the scientific profession – Government and industry – that kind of value means little. Science that delivers technologies for war or profit, preferably both, is of value to them. To complicate matters, to an average citizen all data-based knowledge has now become a domain for ‘experts’. Consequently, when bad or bogus knowledge is touted as ‘scientific’ or ‘expert advice’, the value of all knowledge is undermined. Unfortunately, in the post-truth world ‘expert advice’ is often nothing but lies cloaked in bad or fraudulent statistical data. A closer examination of the ideology that drives this rampant misuse of data in the name of science is therefore necessary.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv118%2Fi1%2F22-23