Current Science

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Global Research Landscape of High-Level Studies in Geosciences based on Highly Cited Papers


Affiliations
1 Library, China University of Petroleum (East China), Qingdao 266580, India
 

The objective of this study was to analyse the characteristics of highly cited papers (HCPs) in the research field of geosciences based on the Essential Science Indicators database, which is widely used to evaluate institutions and researchers. Multi-aspects, including country/region’s productivity distribution, organizations, authors, detailed categories and hot topics, journals and implications of collaboration networks have been explored in this study. The main findings are: (1) USA ranks first in geosciences research with over 60% global share, with most of the leading organizations (12 out of 15) also from that country. (2) The percentage of international collaborations is high in this research field; the collaboration shows tangled networks among countries/regions (organizations) and also indicates close connections worldwide. (3) Despite the dominance of USA in productivity, only 5 of the top 15 authors are from that country, and relatively tight collaboration networks are found among the top authors. (4) The current high-level researches in geosciences focus on meteorology, geochemistry, geophysics, remote sensing and oceanography, and topics involving climate change draw most of the attention.

Keywords

Geosciences, Global Research, Highly Cited Papers.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Earth Science; Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth_ science. (accessed on 11 December 2018).

  • Pislyakov, V. and Shukshina, E., Measuring excellence in Russia: highly cited papers, leading institutions, patterns of national and international collaboration. J. Assoc. Infor. Sci. Technol., 2014, 65(11), 2321–2330.

  • Ivanović, D. and Ho, Y. S., Highly cited articles in the information science and library science category in social science citation index: a bibliometric analysis. J. Libr. Inf. Sci., 2016, 48, 36–46.

  • Zhang, N., Wan, S. and Wang, P., A bibliometric analysis of highly cited papers in the field of Economics and Business based on the Essential Science Indicators database. Scientometrics, 2018, 116, 1039–1053.

  • China Discipline Ranking (in Chinese). Baidu baike; https://baike.baidu.com/item/%E5%AD%A6%E7%A7%91%E8%AF%84%E4%BC%B0/1651285?fr=aladdin (accessed on 4 December 2018).

  • The Best Global Universities rankings. US News; https:// www.usnews.com/education/best-global-universities/articles/methodology. (accessed on 10 December 2018).

  • Incites, https://clarivate.com/products/incites/. (accessed on 10 December 2018).

  • van Eck, N. J. and Waltman, L., Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 2010, 84(2), 523–538.

  • van Eck, N. J. and Waltman, L., Visualizing bibliometric networks. Measuring Scholarly Impact, 2014, 285–320.

  • Borrett, S. R., Moody, J. and Edelmann, A., The rise of network ecology: maps of the topic diversity and scientific collaboration. Ecol. Model, 2014, 293, 111–127.

  • Wang, Q. and Li, R. R., Research status of shale gas: a review. Renew. Sustain. Energ. Rev, 2017, 74, 715–720.

  • Chen, H. and Ho, Y. S., Highly cited articles in biomass research: a bibliometric analysis. Renew. Sustain. Energ. Rev., 2015, 49, 12–20.

  • Fu, H. Z. and Ho, Y. S., Highly cited Antarctic articles using Science Citation Index Expanded: a bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics, 2016, 109, 337–357.

  • Amano, T., González-Varo, J. P. and Sutherland, W. J., Languages are still a major barrier to global science. PLoS Biol., 2016, 14(12), e2000933.

  • Johnson, N. G., Decision making limitations from communication barriers in government structures in Chinese rural energy projects. Master Thesis, Iowa State University, USA, 2008.

  • Hoekman, J., Frenken, K. and Tijssen, R. J. W., Research collaboration at a distance: changing spatial patterns of scientific collaboration within Europe. Res. Policy, 2010, 39, 662–673.

  • Daraio, C. and Moed, H. F., Is Italian science declining? Res. Pol., 2011, 40, 1380–1392.

  • Commission of the European Communities, Green paper. The European Research Area: New Perspectives. {SEC(2007) 412}, COM(2007)161 final, Brussels, 4 April 2007.

  • NSF budget requests to Congress and annual appropriations, National Science Foundation (US); https://www.nsf.gov/about/budget/index.jsp. (accessed on 3 January 2019).

  • China Statistical Yearbook, National Bureau of Statistics of China. http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/tjcbw/201810/t20181024_1629505.html (accessed on 20 December 2018).

  • Allen, R., Forsyth, D., Gaherty, J., Orcutt, J., Toomey, D. and Trehu, A., Ocean bottom seismology workshop report. IRIS Consortium, 2012, p. 40.

  • NASA’s Earth Science mission portfolio, Report No. IG-17-003; https://oig.nasa.gov/docs/IG-17-003.pdf. (accessed on 28 December 2018).

  • Chuang, K. Y., Wang, M. H. and Ho, Y. S., High-impact papers presented in the subject category of water resources in the essential science indicators database of the institute for scientific information. Scientometrics, 2011, 87, 551–562.

  • Huang, M. H. and Huang, M. J., An analysis of global research funding from subject field and funding agencies perspective in the G9 countries. Scientometrics, 2018, 115, 833–847.

  • Moss, R. H. et al., The next generation of scenarios for climate change research and assessment. Nature, 2010, 463, 747–756.


Abstract Views: 371

PDF Views: 134




  • Global Research Landscape of High-Level Studies in Geosciences based on Highly Cited Papers

Abstract Views: 371  |  PDF Views: 134

Authors

Yanlin Cui
Library, China University of Petroleum (East China), Qingdao 266580, India

Abstract


The objective of this study was to analyse the characteristics of highly cited papers (HCPs) in the research field of geosciences based on the Essential Science Indicators database, which is widely used to evaluate institutions and researchers. Multi-aspects, including country/region’s productivity distribution, organizations, authors, detailed categories and hot topics, journals and implications of collaboration networks have been explored in this study. The main findings are: (1) USA ranks first in geosciences research with over 60% global share, with most of the leading organizations (12 out of 15) also from that country. (2) The percentage of international collaborations is high in this research field; the collaboration shows tangled networks among countries/regions (organizations) and also indicates close connections worldwide. (3) Despite the dominance of USA in productivity, only 5 of the top 15 authors are from that country, and relatively tight collaboration networks are found among the top authors. (4) The current high-level researches in geosciences focus on meteorology, geochemistry, geophysics, remote sensing and oceanography, and topics involving climate change draw most of the attention.

Keywords


Geosciences, Global Research, Highly Cited Papers.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv118%2Fi4%2F532-542