Current Science

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Effect of Lintel Beam on Response Reduction Factor of RC-Infilled Frames


Affiliations
1 Indian Institute of Technology, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi 221 005, India
2 Earthquake Engineering Research Centre, International Institute of Information Technology Hyderabad, Gachibowli, Hyderabad 500 032, India
 

In this study, a three-dimensional, four-storied, rein-forced concrete (RC) building is designed for seismic zone-IV and seismically evaluated for different infill configurations along with consideration of openings in infills to develop a realistic model. Four models are considered, i.e. model I (full RC-infilled frame without lintel beam), model II (bare frame without lintel beam), model III (full RC-infilled frame with lintel beam) and model IV (bare frame with lintel beam). In this study, we have evaluated the effect of lintel beams on response reduction factor of the frame structure. The nonlinear static adaptive pushover analysis has been done using Seismostruct program. In seismic design, the response reduction factor (R-factor) reduces from the elastic to inelastic strength. The R-factor is one of the design tools to show the level of inelasticity in a structure and so it has significant importance in the earthquake engineering field. The response reduction factor mainly consists of ‘ductility reduction factor’ and ‘over strength factor’, which are evaluated from static adaptive pushover analysis. Ultimately the response reduction factor isobtained for the building and compared with the value recommended by IS 1893 Part-1 (2016). The results depict that the R-factor values of full RC-infilled frames and bare frames with incorporation of lintel beams are higher than other frames without lintel beam. However, R-factor values of bare frames are lower than the corresponding values recommended in the BIS code.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Alguhane, T. M., Ayman, H. K., Fayed, M. N. and Ayman M. I., Seismic assessment of old existing RC buildings with masonry infill in Madinah as per ASCE. Int. J. Civ., Environ., Struct., Construct., Architect. Eng., 2015, 9(1), 52–63.

  • Chaulagain, H., Rodrigues, H., Spacone, E., Guragain, R., Mallik, R. and Varum, H., A response reduction factor of irregular RC buildings in Kathmandu valley. Earthquake Eng. Eng. Vibr., 2014, 13, 455–470.

  • Maheri, M. R. and Akbari, R., Seismic behaviour factor, R, for steel X-braced and knee-braced RC buildings. Eng. Struct., 2003, 25, 1505–1513.

  • Shendkar, M. and Pradeepkumar, R., Influence of opening in infill on Rfactor of RC infilled frame structures. ICI J., 2018, 1–6.

  • Shendkar, M. and Pradeepkumar, R., Response reduction factor of RC framed structures with semi-interlocked masonry and unreinforced masonry infill. ICI J., 2018, 24–28.

  • Kalkan, E. and Kunnath, S. K., Adaptive modal combination procedure for nonlinear static analysis of building structures. J. Struct. Eng. ASCE, 2006, 132(11), 1721–1731.

  • Gupta, B. and Kunnath, S. K., Adaptive spectra-based pushover procedure for seismic evaluation of structures. Earthquake Spectra, 2000, 16(2), 367–391.

  • Antoniou, S. and Pinho, R., Advantages and limitations of adaptive and nonadaptive force-based pushover procedures. J. Earthquake Eng., 2004, 8(4), 497–522.

  • Chaulagain, H., Guragain, R. and Mallik, R. K., Assessment of response reduction factor of RC buildings in Kathmandu valley using nonlinear pushover analysis, ME thesis, Purbanchal University, Nepal, 2010.

  • ATC 19, Seismic Response Modification Factors, Applied Technical Council, California Seismic Safety Commission, Redwood City, California, USA, 1995.

  • Uang, C. M., Establishing Rand Cdfactors for building seismic provisions. J. Struct. Eng., ASCE, 1991, 117(1), 19–28.

  • Aswin, P. T., Seismic evaluation of 4-story reinforced concrete structure by non-linear static pushover analysis. Bachelor of Technology thesis, National Institute of Technology, Rourkela, 2013.

  • IS: 1893, Criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures – Part-1: General provisions and buildings (sixth Revision), Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, 2016.

  • Park, R., Ductility evaluation from laboratory and analytical testing. In Proceedings of the 9th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, University of Tokyo, Japan, 1988, 8, 605–616.

  • Crisafulli, F. J., Seismic behavior of reinforced concrete structures with masonry infills. PhD thesis, University of Canterbury, New Zealand, 1997.


Abstract Views: 408

PDF Views: 129




  • Effect of Lintel Beam on Response Reduction Factor of RC-Infilled Frames

Abstract Views: 408  |  PDF Views: 129

Authors

Mangeshkumar R. Shendkar
Indian Institute of Technology, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi 221 005, India
Sasankasekhar Mandal
Indian Institute of Technology, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi 221 005, India
Ramancharla Pradeep Kumar
Earthquake Engineering Research Centre, International Institute of Information Technology Hyderabad, Gachibowli, Hyderabad 500 032, India

Abstract


In this study, a three-dimensional, four-storied, rein-forced concrete (RC) building is designed for seismic zone-IV and seismically evaluated for different infill configurations along with consideration of openings in infills to develop a realistic model. Four models are considered, i.e. model I (full RC-infilled frame without lintel beam), model II (bare frame without lintel beam), model III (full RC-infilled frame with lintel beam) and model IV (bare frame with lintel beam). In this study, we have evaluated the effect of lintel beams on response reduction factor of the frame structure. The nonlinear static adaptive pushover analysis has been done using Seismostruct program. In seismic design, the response reduction factor (R-factor) reduces from the elastic to inelastic strength. The R-factor is one of the design tools to show the level of inelasticity in a structure and so it has significant importance in the earthquake engineering field. The response reduction factor mainly consists of ‘ductility reduction factor’ and ‘over strength factor’, which are evaluated from static adaptive pushover analysis. Ultimately the response reduction factor isobtained for the building and compared with the value recommended by IS 1893 Part-1 (2016). The results depict that the R-factor values of full RC-infilled frames and bare frames with incorporation of lintel beams are higher than other frames without lintel beam. However, R-factor values of bare frames are lower than the corresponding values recommended in the BIS code.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv118%2Fi7%2F1077-1086