Current Science

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Performance Evaluation of Anaerobic Baffled Biodigester for Treatment of Black Water


Affiliations
1 Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai 600 036, India
 

In this study, the performance of anaerobic baffled biodigester installed in different regions of South India was evaluated for black water treatment. The evaluation was based on the vendors, establishment, impact of different sampling method s (grab and composite sampling) and the application of post-treatment unit. The treatment efficiency of the digester was assessed in terms of removal of organics (biological oxygen demand (BOD), chemical oxygen demand (COD) ), total suspended solids (TSS) and pathogens (faecal coliform). The maximum removal rate of COD, BOD and TSS was found to be in the range of 70–75%, 68– 80% and 55–75% respectively. Variations were observed between the grab and composite samplings with respect to the removal efficiency of organics, solids and pathogens. There was no significant difference in the performances of anaerobic biodigesters installed by different vendors in South India. The application of post- treatment unit such as gravel bed/reed bed after biodigester facilitated the removal of residual organic pollutants and provided better quality outlet water. The results indicated that the perfo rmance of anaerobic baffled biodigesters varies based on the number of users, location, usage pattern and the post-treatment unit installed.

Keywords

Anaerobic Digestion, Biodigester, Black Water, Community Toilet, Onsite Treatment, Sanitation.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Lindley, S. T., Estimation of population growth and extinction parameters from noisy data. Ecol. Appl., 2003, 13, 806–813.

  • Martin, H., The Archaean grey gnesisses and the genesis of continental crust. In Archaean Crustal Evolution (ed. Condie, K. C.), Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherland, 1994, pp. 205–259.

  • Rao, K. N. and Vaidyanadhan, R., Geomorphic features in Krishna Delta and its evolution. In Proceedings of the National Symposium on Morphology and Evolution of Landforms, Department of Geology, Delhi University, New Delhi, 1978.

  • WHO/UNICEF Joint Water Supply and Sanitation Monitoring Programme, 2014. Progress on drinking water and sanitation: 2014 update. World Health Organization.

  • Jin, Z. et al., Black water collected from the septic tank treated with a living machine system: HRT effect and microbial community structure. Chemosphere, 2018, 210, 745–752.

  • Medilanski, E., Chuan, L., Mosler, H. J., Schertenleib, R. and Larsen, T. A., Wastewater management in Kunming, China: a stakeholder perspective on measures at the source. Environ. Urban., 2006, 18, 353–368.

  • Larsen, T. A. and Gujer, W., Separate management of anthropogenic nutrient solution (human urine). Water Sci. Technol., 1996, 34, 87–94.

  • Sasse, L., DEWATS: decentralised wastewater treatment in developing countries. Bremen Overseas Research and Development Association, Germany, 1998.

  • Lutterbeck, C. A., Zerwes, F. V., Radtke, J. F., Köhler, A., Kist, L. T. and Machado, Ê. L., Integrated system with constructed wetlands for the treatment of domestic wastewaters generated at a rural property – evaluation of general parameters, ecotoxicity and cytogenetics. Ecol. Eng., 2018, 115, 1–8.

  • Sabry, T., Evaluation of decentralized treatment of sewage employing upflow septic tank/baffled reactor (USBR) in developing countries. J. Hazard. Mater., 2010, 174, 500–505.

  • Sharma, M. K. and Kazmi, A. A., Anaerobic onsite treatment of black water using filter-based packaged system as an alternative of conventional septic tank. Ecol. Eng., 2015, 75, 457–461.

  • Zhou, J., Wang, X. C., Ji, Z., Xu, L. and Yu, Z., Source identification of bacterial and viral pa thogens and their survival/fading in the process of wastewater treatment, reclamation, and environmental reuse. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 2015, 31, 109–120.

  • Ladu, J. L. C. and Lü, X. W., Effects of hydraulic retention time, temperature, and effluent recycling on efficiency of anaerobic filter in treating rural domestic wastewater. Water Sci. Eng., 2014, 7, 168–182.

  • Bodik, I., Kratochv, L. K., Gaparikov, E. and Hutan, M., Nitrogen removal in an anaerobic baffled filter reactor with aer obic post-treatment. Bioresour. Technol., 2003, 86, 79–84.

  • Luostarinen, S., Sanders, W., Kujawa-Roeleveld, K. and Zeeman, G., Effect of temperature on anaerobic treatment of black water in UASB-septic tank systems. Bioresour Technol., 2007, 98, 980– 986.

  • Langenhoff, A. A. and Stuckey, D. C., Treatment of dilute wastewater using an anaerobic baffled reactor: effect of low temperature. Water Res., 2000, 34, 3867–3875.

  • Manariotis, I. D. and Grigoropoulos, S. G., Low-strength wastewater treatment using an anaerobic baffled reactor. Water Environ. Res., 2002, 74, 170–176.

  • Kumar, G. S., Kar, S. S. and Jain, A., Health and environmental sanitation in India: issues for prioritizing control strategies. Indian J. Occup. Environ. Med., 2011, 15, 93.

  • American Public Health Association (APHA) (2012) Standard method for examination of water and wastewater, 18th edn. American Public Health Association, Washington DC.

  • Ramana, K. V., Tomar, A. and Singh, L., Effect of various carbon and nitrogen sources on cellulose synthesis by Acetobacter xylinum. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 2000, 16, 245–248.

  • DRDO FICCI, Accelerated technology assessment and commercialization, 2014; http://drdoficciatac.com/biodigester/ aboutus.asp.

  • Kujawa-Roeleveld, K. and Zeeman, G., Anaerobic treatment in decentralised and source separation-based sanitation concepts. Rev. Environ. Sci. Bio/Technol., 2006, 5, 115–139

  • Hocaoglu, S. M., Insel, G. and Cokgor, E. U., COD fractionation and biodegradation kinetics of segregated domestic wastewater: black and grey water fractions. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol., 2010, 85, 1241–1249.

  • Colon, J., Aaron, A., Forbis-Stokes and Deshusses, M. A., Anaerobic digestion of undiluted simulant human excreta for sanitation and energy recovery in less-developed countries, Energy Sustain. Dev., 2015, 57–64.

  • DeGraaff, M. S., Zeeman, G., Temmink, H. and Buisman, C. J. N., Anaerobic treatment of concentrated black water in a UASB reactor at a short HRT. Water, 2010, 2, 101–119.

  • Tchobanoglous, G., Burton, F. L. and Stensel, H. D., Wastewater Engineering: Treatment, Disposal, Reuse, Metcalf and Eddy, Inc., New York, USA, 2003.

  • Voorthuizen, E., Zwijnenburg, A., van der Meer, W. and Temmink, H., Biological black water treatment combined with membrane separation. Water Res., 2008, 42, 4334–4340

  • Munoz, M. A., Rosales, R. M., Gabarron, M., Faz, A. and Acosta, J. A., Effects of the hydraulic retention time on pig slurry purification by constructed wetlands and stabilization ponds.Water, Air, Soil Pollut., 2016, 9, 227–293.

  • CPCB, MoEFCC draft notification, Central Pollution Control Board, New Delhi, 2015.

  • Nguyen, A. V., Pham, N. T., Nguyen, T. H., Morel, A. and Tonderski, K., Improved septic tank with constructed wetland, a promising decentralized wastewater treatment alternative in Vietnam. In NOWRA 16th Annual Technical Education Conference and Exposition, Hanoi, 2007, pp. 1–17.

  • Schaeffer, D. J., Kerster, H. W. and Janardan, K. G., Grab versus composite sampling: a primer for the manager and engineer.J. Environ. Manage., 1980, 4, 157–163.


Abstract Views: 334

PDF Views: 135




  • Performance Evaluation of Anaerobic Baffled Biodigester for Treatment of Black Water

Abstract Views: 334  |  PDF Views: 135

Authors

Ligy Philip
Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai 600 036, India
K. Kalaivani
Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai 600 036, India
Praveen Rosario
Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai 600 036, India
Vamsi Krishna
Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai 600 036, India
S. SriShalini
Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai 600 036, India

Abstract


In this study, the performance of anaerobic baffled biodigester installed in different regions of South India was evaluated for black water treatment. The evaluation was based on the vendors, establishment, impact of different sampling method s (grab and composite sampling) and the application of post-treatment unit. The treatment efficiency of the digester was assessed in terms of removal of organics (biological oxygen demand (BOD), chemical oxygen demand (COD) ), total suspended solids (TSS) and pathogens (faecal coliform). The maximum removal rate of COD, BOD and TSS was found to be in the range of 70–75%, 68– 80% and 55–75% respectively. Variations were observed between the grab and composite samplings with respect to the removal efficiency of organics, solids and pathogens. There was no significant difference in the performances of anaerobic biodigesters installed by different vendors in South India. The application of post- treatment unit such as gravel bed/reed bed after biodigester facilitated the removal of residual organic pollutants and provided better quality outlet water. The results indicated that the perfo rmance of anaerobic baffled biodigesters varies based on the number of users, location, usage pattern and the post-treatment unit installed.

Keywords


Anaerobic Digestion, Biodigester, Black Water, Community Toilet, Onsite Treatment, Sanitation.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv118%2Fi8%2F1265-1274