Current Science

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Biopolymer Based Hydrogels for Arsenic Removal


Affiliations
1 Department of Materials Engineering, Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru 560 012, India
 

Water contamination by arsenic has led to serious human-health hazards. Millions of people die every year in several countries of the world because of arsenic-rich groundwater. To date, adsorption by activated carbon, iron-basedadsorbents, zeolite and hydrogels have been widely used for arsenic-ion removal. Among these, adsorption by renewable resource-based hydrogels has ignited great interest because of biocompatibility, biodegradability, low cost and non-toxicity properties. This article discusses the biopolymer-based hydrogels like cellulose, chitin, pectin and chitosan for arsenic removal. It also discusses the arsenic chemistry, health hazards caused by arsenic, pros and cons of various techniques used for arsenic removal and different mechanisms involved in arsenic adsorption. Though hydrogels are capable of bringing down the arsenic level below the WHO limit, their reusability, recovery of industrially important metal ions from hydrogels and the mechanical stability of hydrogels under harsh conditions should be given more focus in future research.

Keywords

Adsorption, Arsenic, Biopolymer, Hydrogels, Reusability.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Sohel, N., Persson, L. Å., Rahman, M., Streatfield, P. K., Yunus, M., Ekström, E.-C. and Vahter, M., Arsenic in drinking water and adult mortality: a population-based cohort study in rural Bangladesh. Epidemiology, 2009, 20(6), 824–830.

  • Ungureanu, G., Santos, S., Boaventura, R. and Botelho, C., Arse-nic and antimony in water and wastewater: overview of removal techniques with special reference to latest advances in adsorption.J. Environ. Manage., 2015, 151, 326–342.

  • Mohan, D. and Pittman, C. U., Arsenic removal from water/ wastewater using adsorbents – a critical review. J. Hazardous Mater., 2007, 142(1), 1–53.

  • Yogarajah, N. and Tsai, S. S., Detection of trace arsenic in drinking water: challenges and opportunities for microfluidics.Environ. Sci.: Water Res. Technol., 2015, 1(4), 426–447.

  • Chatterjee, S. and De, S., Adsorptive removal of arsenic from groundwater using a novel high flux polyacrylonitrile (PAN)– laterite mixed matrix ultrafiltration membrane. Environ. Sci.: Water Res. Technol., 2015, 1(2), 227–243.

  • Vasudevan, S., Mohan, S., Sozhan, G., Raghavendran, N. S. and Murugan, C. V., Studies on the oxidation of As(III) to As(V) by in-situ-generated hypochlorite. Indus. Eng. Chem. Res., 2006, 45(22), 7729–7732.

  • Singh, R., Singh, S., Parihar, P., Singh, V. P. and Prasad, S. M., Arsenic contamination, consequences and remediation techniques: a review. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Safety, 2015, 112, 247– 270.

  • Mondal, M. K. and Garg, R., A comprehensive review on removal of arsenic using activated carbon prepared from easily available waste materials. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 2017, 1–12.

  • Smedley, P. and Kinniburgh, D., A review of the source, behaviour and distribution of arsenic in natural waters. Appl.Geochem., 2002, 17(5), 517–568.

  • Hsueh, Y.-M., Cheng, G., Wu, M., Yu, H., Kuo, T. and Chen, C.J., Multiple risk factors associated with arsenic-induced skin cancer: effects of chronic liver disease and malnutritional status.Br. J. Cancer, 1995, 71(1), 109.

  • Maharjan, M., Watanabe, C., Ahmad, S. A. and Ohtsuka, R., Arsenic contamination in drinking water and skin manifestations in lowland Nepal: the first community-based survey. Am. J. Trop.Med. Hygiene, 2005, 73(2), 477–479.

  • USEPA, A., Final rule. Federal Register, 2001, 66(14), 6976– 7066.

  • Barakat, M., New trends in removing heavy metals from industrial wastewater. Arab. J. Chem., 2011, 4(4), 361–377.

  • Chen, Y., Chen, L., Bai, H. and Li, L., Graphene oxide–chitosan composite hydrogels as broad-spectrum adsorbents for water purification. J. Mater. Chem.A, 2013, 1(6), 1992–2001.

  • Ali, I., New generation adsorbents for water treatment. Chem.Rev., 2012, 112(10), 5073–5091.

  • Han, C., Li, H., Pu, H., Yu, H., Deng, L., Huang, S. and Luo, Y., Synthesis and characterization of mesoporous alumina and their performances for removing arsenic (V). Chem. Eng. J., 2013, 217, 1–9.

  • Sun, X., Hu, C., Hu, X., Qu, J. and Yang, M., Characterization and adsorption performance of Zr‐doped akaganéite for efficient arsenic removal. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol., 2013, 88(4), 629– 635.

  • Srivastava, V. C., Mall, I. D. and Mishra, I. M., Adsorption of toxic metal ions onto activated carbon: Study of sorption behaviour through characterization and kinetics. Chem. Eng. Proc.: Proc.Intensification, 2008, 47(8), 1269–1280.

  • Erdem, E., Karapinar, N. and Donat, R., The removal of heavy metal cations by natural zeolites. J. Colloid Interf. Sci., 2004, 280(2), 309–314.

  • Kandile, N. G. and Nasr, A. S., Environment friendly modified chitosan hydrogels as a matrix for adsorption of metal ions, synthesis and characterization. Carbohydrate Polym., 2009, 78(4), 753–759.

  • Sudhavani, T., Reddy, N. S., Rao, K. M., Rao, K., Ramkumar, J.and Reddy, A., Development of thiourea-formaldehyde crosslinked chitosan membrane networks for separation of Cu(II) and Ni(II) ions. Bull. Korean Chem. Soc., 2013, 34(5), 1513–1520.

  • Vani, T. S., Reddy, N. S., Reddy, P. R., Rao, K. K., Ramkumar, J. and Reddy, A., Synthesis, characterization, and metal uptake capacity of a new polyaniline and poly (acrylic acid) grafted sodium alginate/gelatin adsorbent. Desalin. Water Treat., 2014, 52(1–3), 526–535.

  • Li, N. and Bai, R., Copper adsorption on chitosan–cellulose hydrogel beads: behaviors and mechanisms. Separat. Purificat. Technol., 2005, 42(3), 237–247.

  • Geckeler, K. E., Polymer-metal complexes for environmental protection. Chemoremediation in the aqueous homogeneous phase.Pure Appl. Chem., 2001, 73(1), 129–136.

  • Boddu, V. M., Abburi, K., Talbott, J. L., Smith, E. D. and Haasch, R., Removal of arsenic (III) and arsenic (V) from aqueous medium using chitosan-coated biosorbent. Water Res., 2008, 42(3), 633–642.

  • Elvira, C., Mano, J., San Roman, J. and Reis, R., Starch-based biodegradable hydrogels with potential biomedical applications as drug delivery systems. Biomaterials, 2002, 23(9), 1955–1966.

  • Yetimoğlu, E. K., Kahraman, M., Ercan, Ö., Akdemir, Z. and Apohan, N. K., N-vinylpyrrolidone/acrylic acid/2-acrylamido-2-methylpropane sulfonic acid based hydrogels: synthesis, characterization and their application in the removal of heavy metals. React. Funct. Polym., 2007, 67(5), 451–460.

  • Li, X., Li, Y., Zhang, S. and Ye, Z., Preparation and characterization of new foam adsorbents of poly (vinyl alcohol)/chitosan composites and their removal for dye and heavy metal from aqueous solution. Chem. Eng. J., 2012, 183, 88–97.

  • Das, D. and Pal, S., Modified biopolymer-dextrin based cross-linked hydrogels: application in controlled drug delivery. RSC Adv., 2015, 5(32), 25014–25050.

  • Yetimoğlu, E. K., Kahraman, M., Ercan, Ö., Akdemir, Z. and Apohan, N. K., N-vinylpyrrolidone/acrylic acid/2-acrylamido-2-methylpropane sulfonic acid based hydrogels: synthesis, characterization and their application in the removal of heavy metals. React. Funct. Polym., 2007, 67(5), 451–460.

  • Vashist, A., Vashist, A., Gupta, Y. and Ahmad, S., Recent advances in hydrogel based drug delivery systems for the human body. J. Mater. Chem. B, 2014, 2(2), 147–166.

  • Peppas, N., Bures, P., Leobandung, W. and Ichikawa, H., Hydrogels in pharmaceutical formulations. Eur. J. Pharmaceut. Biopharm., 2000, 50(1), 27–46.

  • Van Vlierberghe, S., Dubruel, P.and Schacht, E., Biopolymer-based hydrogels as scaffolds for tissue engineering applications: a review. Biomacromolecules, 2011, 12(5), 1387–1408.

  • Su, F., Zhou, H., Zhang, Y. and Wang, G., Three-dimensional honeycomb-like structured zero-valent iron/chitosan composite foams for effective removal of inorganic arsenic in water. J. Colloid Interf. Sci., 2016, 478, 421–429.

  • Dambies, L., Guibal, E. and Roze, A., Arsenic (V) sorption on molybdate-impregnated chitosan beads. Colloid. Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp., 2000, 170(1), 19–31.

  • Nata, I. F., Sureshkumar, M. and Lee, C.-K., One-pot preparation of amine-rich magnetite/bacterial cellulose nanocomposite and its application for arsenate removal. RSC Adv., 2011, 1(4), 625–631.

  • Sanyang, M., Ghani, W. A. W. A. K., Idris, A. and Ahmad, M. B., Hydrogel biochar composite for arsenic removal from wastewater. Desalin. Water Treat., 2016, 57(8), 3674–3688.

  • Marques Neto, J. D. O., Bellato, C. R., Milagres, J. L., Pessoa, K. D. and Alvarenga, E. S. D., Preparation and evaluation of chitosan beads immobilized with Iron(III) for the removal of As(III) and As (V) from water. J. Braz. Chem. Soc., 2013, 24(1), 121–132.

  • Kumar, A. A. et al., Confined metastable 2‐line ferrihydrite for affordable point‐of‐use arsenic‐free drinking water. Adv. Mater., 2017, 29(7).

  • Chowdhury, M. N. K., Ismail, A. F., Beg, M. D. H., Hegde, G. and Gohari, R. J., Polyvinyl alcohol/polysaccharide hydrogel graft materials for arsenic and heavy metal removal. New J. Chem., 2015, 39(7), 5823–5832.

  • Ramos, M. L. P., González, J. A., Albornoz, S. G., Pérez, C. J., Villanueva, M. E., Giorgieri, S. A. and Copello, G. J., Chitin hydrogel reinforced with TiO2nanoparticles as an arsenic sorbent. Chem. Eng. J., 2016, 285, 581–587.

  • Sanyang, M. L., Ghani, W. A. W. A. K., Idris, A. and Ahmad, M. B., Hydrogel biochar composite for arsenic removal from wastewater. Desalin. Water Treat., 2016, 57(8), 3674–3688.

  • Hao, L., Wang, P. and Valiyaveettil, S., Successive extraction of As(V), Cu(II) and P(V) ions from water using spent coffee powder as renewable bioadsorbents. Sci. Rep., 2017, 7.

  • Ye, S., Jin, W., Huang, Q., Hu, Y., Shah, B. R., Liu, S., Li, Y. and Li, B., Fabrication and characterization of KGM-based FMBO-containing aerogels for removal of arsenite in aqueous solution. RSC Adv., 2015, 5, 41877–41886.

  • Meng, L. D., Wu, M., Tian, Y., Kuga, S. and Huang, Y., Absorption behavior of a modified cellulose hydrogel for both fluoride and arsenic. Adv. Mater. Res., 2013, 726–731, 733–738.

  • El-Sherbiny, I. M., Abdel-Hamid, M. I., Rashad, M., Ali, A. S. M. and Azab, Y. A., New calcareous soil–alginate composites for efficient uptake of Fe(III), Mn(II) and As(V) from water. Carbohydr. Polym., 2013, 96, 450–459.


Abstract Views: 443

PDF Views: 142




  • Biopolymer Based Hydrogels for Arsenic Removal

Abstract Views: 443  |  PDF Views: 142

Authors

Shabnam Pathan
Department of Materials Engineering, Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru 560 012, India
Suryasarathi Bose
Department of Materials Engineering, Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru 560 012, India

Abstract


Water contamination by arsenic has led to serious human-health hazards. Millions of people die every year in several countries of the world because of arsenic-rich groundwater. To date, adsorption by activated carbon, iron-basedadsorbents, zeolite and hydrogels have been widely used for arsenic-ion removal. Among these, adsorption by renewable resource-based hydrogels has ignited great interest because of biocompatibility, biodegradability, low cost and non-toxicity properties. This article discusses the biopolymer-based hydrogels like cellulose, chitin, pectin and chitosan for arsenic removal. It also discusses the arsenic chemistry, health hazards caused by arsenic, pros and cons of various techniques used for arsenic removal and different mechanisms involved in arsenic adsorption. Though hydrogels are capable of bringing down the arsenic level below the WHO limit, their reusability, recovery of industrially important metal ions from hydrogels and the mechanical stability of hydrogels under harsh conditions should be given more focus in future research.

Keywords


Adsorption, Arsenic, Biopolymer, Hydrogels, Reusability.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv118%2Fi10%2F1540-1546