Open Access
Subscription Access
Challenges to Identify and Mentor Gifted Children in Developing Countries: The Indian Experience
The National Education Policy 2020 (NEP-2020) has recognized the need to identify and nurture gifted and talented children beyond the school curriculum. Through systematic research, the National Institute of Advanced Studies, Bengaluru has developed multiple protocols for identifying and multi-level, multi-stage mentoring of gifted children. This study argues that there is need for a paradigm shift in the identification process that predominantly uses psychometric measurements in the portfolio that captures the actual data points of gifted children. This is particularly relevant for developing countries like India, which has a diverse population predominantly from disadvantaged communities. Establishing norms for standardized psychometric tests developed for the western populations will have inherent limitations to identifying the gifted children in multi-lingual and multi-cultural contexts. Needless to state, India has far too few trained psychologists to accomplish this task.
Keywords
Developing Countries, Gifted Children, Identification, Mentoring, Psychometric Measurements.
User
Font Size
Information
- NAGC, Key considerations in identifying and supporting gifted and talented learners – a report from the 2018 NAGC Definition Task Force. National Association for the Gifted Children, Washington DC, 2019; https://www.nagc.org/sites/default/files/Position%20Statement/Definition%20of%20Giftedness%20%282019%29.pdf (accessed in September 2020).
- Davalos, R. and Griffin, G., The impact of teachers’ individualized practices on gifted students in rural, heterogeneous classrooms. Roeper Rev., 1999, 21(4), 308–314; doi:10.1080/02783199909553982.
- Neihart, M. et al. (eds), The Social and Emotional Development of Gifted Children: What do we know? Prufrock Press, Waco, TX, USA, 2002.
- MHRD, National Education Policy 2020, Ministry for Human Resource Development, GoI, 2020, p. 65; https://www.mhrd.gov.in/sites/upload_files/mhrd/files/nep/NEP_Final_English.pdf (accessed in September 2020).
- NIAS, Teacher nomination behavioural rating scale. National Institute of Advanced Studies, Bengaluru, 2013; http://prodigy.net.in/nomination_form (accessed in September 2020).
- Smutny, J. F., Teaching young gifted children in the regular classroom, 2000; https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED445422.pdf (accessed in September 2020).
- Gross, M. U. M., Small poppies: highly gifted children in the early years. Roeper Rev., 1999, 21(3), 207–214; doi:10.1080/ 02783199909553963.
- Pfeiffer, S. I. and Petscher, Y., Identifying young gifted children using the gifted rating scales – preschool and kindergarten form. Gifted Child Q., 2008, 52, 19–29; doi:10.1177/0016986207311055 [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar].
- Raven, J. C., Court, J. H. and Raven, J., Manual for Raven’s Progressive Matrices, Oxford Psychologists Press, Oxford, UK, 1998.
- Paul, T. E., Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking, Personnel Press, Princeton, NJ, USA, 1966.
- Ford, D. Y., Multicultural gifted education: a wakeup call to the profession. Roeper Rev., 1996, 19, 72–78.
- VanTassel-Baska, J., Patton, J. M. and Prillaman, D., Gifted youth at risk: a report of a national study. The Council for Exceptional Children, Arlington, VA, USA, 1991.
- Karnes, F. A., State definitions for the gifted and talented revisited. Except. Child., 2000, 66, 219–238.
- Kurup, A. and Maithreyi, R., A review of challenges in developing a national program for gifted children in India’s diverse context. Roeper Rev., 2012, 34(4), 215–223.
Abstract Views: 322
PDF Views: 111