Current Science

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Linnean Shortfall Still a Major Concern in India: As Evident by the Micromoth Family Tortricidae (Lepidoptera)


Affiliations
1 National Pusa Collection, Division of Entomology, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, Pusa, New Delhi 110 012, India
 

Anthropogenic activities influence rapid environmental changes on earth and the reality of climate change is a significant feature in implementing conservation action plans in many countries. The knowledge of biodiversity data is an increasingly important source of information in studies of biogeography and conservation. Presence of temporal, spatial and taxonomical gaps in biodiversity documentation is a major concern. One of the major gaps or shortfalls is the lack of taxonomic work, i.e. species descriptions called Linnean shortfall. Here we evaluate patterns of species description in a major micromoth family Tortricidae from India during 1775 to 2018. We found that a total of 392 species of tortricid moths have been described from the country. Among all the authors who have contributed to the species description, eight have described more than 85% of tortricid species from India. The cumulative curve of the tortricid species described showed the highest peak during 1901–1925, wherein 226 species were described from the country. Among the biogeographic zones, the North East Zone recorded the highest species descriptions (47.19%) followed by the Deccan Peninsula (10.71%). Our analysis shows Linnean shortfall in this group and the taxonomic expeditions are skewed towards only a few regions. Accordingly, practices to increase taxonomic expeditions, including increased funding in exploratory research and increasing species discovery rate are the need of the hour in many insect groups.

Keywords

Biogeographic Zones, Conservation, Shortfalls In Biodiversity, Species Description, Tortricid Moths.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Tylianakis, J. M., Didham, R. K., Bascompte, J. and Wardle, D. A., Global change and species interactions in terrestrial ecosystems. Ecol. Lett., 2008, 11, 1351–1363.

  • Brown, J. H. and Lomolino, M. V., Biogeography, Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA, USA, 1998, 2nd edn.

  • Bini, L. M., Diniz-Filho, J. A. F., Ranger, T. F. L. V. B., Bastos, R. P. and Plaza Pinto, M., Challenging Wallacean and Linnean shortfalls: knowledge gradients and conservation planning in a biodiversity hotspot. Divers. Distrib., 2006, 12, 475–482.

  • Cardoso, P., Erwin, T. L., Borges, P. A. and New, T. R., The seven impediments in invertebrate conservation and how to overcome them. Biol. Conserv., 2011, 144(11), 2647–2655.

  • Diniz-Filho, J. A. F., Loyola, R. D., Raia, P., Mooers, A. O. and Bini, L. M., Darwinian shortfalls in biodiversity conservation. Trends Ecol. Evol., 2013, 28(12), 689–695.

  • Hortal, J., de Bello, F., Diniz-Filho, J. A. F., Lewinsohn, T. M., Lobo, J. M. and Ladle, R. J., Seven shortfalls that beset large-scale knowledge of biodiversity. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst., 2015, 46, 523–549.

  • Kozlowski, G., Is the global conservation status assessment of a threatened taxon a utopia? Biodivers. Conserv., 2008, 17(3), 445– 448.

  • Whittaker, R. J., Araujo, M. B., Jepson, P., Ladle, R. J., Watson, J. E. M. and Willis, K. J., Conservation biogeography: assessment and project. Divers. Distrib., 2005, 11, 3–23.

  • New, T. R., Moths (Insecta: Lepidoptera) and conservation: background and perspective. J. Insect Conserv., 2004, 8(2), 79–94.

  • Dolia, J., Devy, M. S., Aravind, N. A. and Kumar, A., Adult butterfly communities in coffee plantations around a protected area in the Western Ghats, India. Anim. Conserv., 2008, 11(1), 26–34.

  • Baixeras, J., Brown, J. W. and Gilligan, T. M., T@RTS: online world catalogue of the Tortricidae, version 1.4.0., 2010; http://www.tortricidae.com/catalogue.asp

  • Horak, M., Olethreutine moths of Australia (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Monogr. Aust. Lepid., 2006, 10, 522.

  • Van der Geest, L. P. and Evenhuis, H. H., Tortricid Pests: Their Biology, Natural Enemies and Control, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1991, p. 808.

  • Brown, J. W., World Catalogue of Insects, Volume 5: Tortricidae (Lepidoptera), Apollo Books, Stenstrup, Denmark, 2005, p. 741.

  • Savela, M., Lepidoptera and some other life forms, 2015; FUNET database – http://www.nic.funet.fi/pub/sci/bio/life/insecta/lepidoptera/ (accessed on 6 September 2018).

  • Meijerman, L. and Ulenberg, S. A., Arthropods of economic importance: Family Tortricidae Leafrollers: Eurasian Tortricidae. Zoological Museum, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2000.

  • Reddy, C. S., Jha, C. S., Diwakar, P. G. and Dadhwal, V. K., Nationwide classification of forest types of India using remote sensing and GIS. Environ. Monit. Assess., 2015, 187(12), 1–30.

  • Meyrick, E., Descriptions of Indian microlepidoptera. J. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc., 1912, 22, 160–182.

  • Deng, J., Li, K., Chen, C., Wu, S. and Huang, X., Discovery pattern and species numberof scale insects (Hemiptera: Coccoidea). Peer J, 2016, 4, e2526.

  • Gaston, K. J., Scoble, M. J. and Crook, A., Patterns in species description: a case study using the Geometridae (Lepidoptera). Biol. J. Linn., 1995, 55(3), 225–237.

  • Musthak Ali, T. M. and Ganeshaiah, K. N., Mapping diversity of ants and ischolar_main grubs. Curr. Sci., 1998, 75(3), 201–204.


Abstract Views: 389

PDF Views: 126




  • Linnean Shortfall Still a Major Concern in India: As Evident by the Micromoth Family Tortricidae (Lepidoptera)

Abstract Views: 389  |  PDF Views: 126

Authors

Santhosh Naik
National Pusa Collection, Division of Entomology, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, Pusa, New Delhi 110 012, India
P. R. Shashank
National Pusa Collection, Division of Entomology, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, Pusa, New Delhi 110 012, India
N. N. Rajgopal
National Pusa Collection, Division of Entomology, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, Pusa, New Delhi 110 012, India
Naresh M. Meshram
National Pusa Collection, Division of Entomology, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, Pusa, New Delhi 110 012, India

Abstract


Anthropogenic activities influence rapid environmental changes on earth and the reality of climate change is a significant feature in implementing conservation action plans in many countries. The knowledge of biodiversity data is an increasingly important source of information in studies of biogeography and conservation. Presence of temporal, spatial and taxonomical gaps in biodiversity documentation is a major concern. One of the major gaps or shortfalls is the lack of taxonomic work, i.e. species descriptions called Linnean shortfall. Here we evaluate patterns of species description in a major micromoth family Tortricidae from India during 1775 to 2018. We found that a total of 392 species of tortricid moths have been described from the country. Among all the authors who have contributed to the species description, eight have described more than 85% of tortricid species from India. The cumulative curve of the tortricid species described showed the highest peak during 1901–1925, wherein 226 species were described from the country. Among the biogeographic zones, the North East Zone recorded the highest species descriptions (47.19%) followed by the Deccan Peninsula (10.71%). Our analysis shows Linnean shortfall in this group and the taxonomic expeditions are skewed towards only a few regions. Accordingly, practices to increase taxonomic expeditions, including increased funding in exploratory research and increasing species discovery rate are the need of the hour in many insect groups.

Keywords


Biogeographic Zones, Conservation, Shortfalls In Biodiversity, Species Description, Tortricid Moths.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv120%2Fi4%2F712-715