Current Science

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Biomass Accumulation and Carbon Stock in Different Agroforestry Systems Prevalent in the Himalayan Foothills, India


Affiliations
1 Forest Research Institute, Dehradun 248 006, India
2 G. B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar 263 145, India
3 ICAR-Indian Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Dehradun 248 001, India
 

Agroforestry has great potential for carbon (C) sequestration among different land uses of the Himalayan region, India. However, our knowledge of C sequestration in particular, agroforestry system around the world is poor. Therefore, we conducted a study to understand biomass accumulation and carbon allocation in different components of the agroforestry system. The highest stem biomass was recorded in Eucalyptus tereticornis (69.43 ± 0.90 Mg ha–1), branch biomass in Populus deltoids (5.04 ± 0.35 Mg ha–1), leaf biomass also in P. deltoids (2.21 ± 0.12 Mg ha–1), and ischolar_main biomass in Albizia procera (14.01 ± 0.44 Mg ha–1). The highest (81.01%) C allocation was recorded in the stem of Toona ciliate, branch of P. deltoids (5.73%), leaves of E. tereticornis (2.93%) and ischolar_main of Anthocephalus cadamba (16.83%). The highest CO2< mitigation (160.5 ± 2.55 Mg CO2 ha–1) and C sequestration (45.33 ± 0.60 Mg ha–1) were recorded in E. tereticornis. The highest wheat crop biomass (11.85 ± 0.23 Mg ha–1) and C stock (3.59 ± 0.05 Mg ha–1) were recorded in P. deltiodes. However, soil carbon stock was recorded in E. tereticornis (37.5 ± 3.52 Mg ha–1). Thus, trees on farmlands with crops are suitable for biomass production and C allocation in different components under changing climatic scenarios.

Keywords

Agroforestry System, Biomass, Carbon Stock, Carbon Dioxide Mitigation, Climate Change.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Albrecht, A. and Kandji, S. T., Carbon sequestration in a tropical agroforestry system. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 2003, 99, 15–27.

  • Oelbermann, M., Voroney, R. P. and Gordon, A. M., Carbon sequestration in tropical and temperate agroforestry systems: a review with examples from Costa Rica and southern Canada. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 2004, 104, 359–377.

  • Yadav, R. P., Gupta, B., Bhutia, P. L., Bisht, J. K. and Pattanayak, A., Sustainable agroforestry systems and their structural components as livelihood options along an elevation gradient in central Himalaya. Biol. Agric. Hortic., 2018, 1–23; doi:10.1080/ 01448765.2018.1457982.

  • Nair, P. K. R., Kumar, B. M. and Nair, V. D., Agroforestry as a strategy for carbon sequestration. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci., 2009, 172, 10–23.

  • Rayment, G. E. and Higginson, F. R., Australian Laboratory Handbook of Soil and Water Chemical Methods, Inkata Press Pty Ltd, 1992.

  • Magnussen, S. and Reed, D., Modeling for estimation and monitoring. national forest assessments – knowledge. Food and Agriculture Organization–International Union of Forest Research Organizations, 2004; http://www.fao.org/forestry/8758/en/

  • Rogelj, J., Meinshausen, M., Schaeffer, M., Knutti, R. and Riahi, K., Impact of short-lived non-CO2 mitigation on carbon budgets for stabilizing global warming. Environ. Res. Lett., 2015, 10, 075001.

  • Wang, X. and Fenz, Z., Atmospheric carbon sequestration through agroforestry in China. Energy, 1995, 20(2), 117–121.

  • Brown, S., Exploration of the carbon sequestration potential of classified forests in the Republic of Guinea. Report submitted to the United States Agency for International Development, Winrock International, VA, USA, 2003, p. 123.

  • Swamy, S. L. and Puri, S., Biomass production and carbon sequestration of Gmelina arborea in plantation and agroforestry system in India. Agrofor. Syst., 2005, 64, 181–195.

  • Ali, A. and Mattsson, E., Individual tree size inequality enhances aboveground biomass in home garden agroforestry systems in the dry zone of Sri Lanka. Sci. Total Environ., 2017, 575, 6–11.

  • Rizvi, R. H., Dhyani, S. K., Yadav, R. S. and Singh, R., Biomass production and carbon stock of popular agroforestry systems in Yamunanagar and Saharanpur districts of northwestern India. Curr. Sci., 2011, 100, 736–742.

  • Dean, T. J. and Baldwin, V. C., Crown management and stand density. In Growing Trees in a Greener World: Industrial Forestry in the 21st Century: 35th LSU Forestry Symposium (ed. Carter, M. C.), Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, Louisiana Agricultural Experiment Station, Baton Rouge, LA, 1996, pp. 148–159.

  • Goswami, S., Verma, K. S. and Kaushal, R., Biomass and carbon sequestration in different agroforestry systems of a Western Himalayan watershed. Biol. Agric. Hortic., 2013, 30, 88–96.

  • Husmann, K., Rumpf, S. and Nagel, J., Biomass functions and nutrient contents of European beech, oak, sycamore maple and ash and their meaning for the biomass supply chain. J. Clean. Prod., 2018, 172, 4044–4072; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.019

  • Devagiri, G. M. et al., Assessment of above-ground biomass and carbon pool in different vegetation types of the southwestern part of Karnataka, India using spectral modeling. Trop. Ecol., 2013, 54, 149–165.

  • Negi, J. D. S., Manhas, R. K. and Chauhan, P. S., Carbon allocation in different components of some tree species of India: a new approach for carbon estimation. Curr. Sci., 2003, 85, 1528–1531.

  • Ajit et al., Modeling analysis of potential carbon sequestration under existing agroforestry systems in three districts of IndoGangetic plains in India. Agrofor. Syst., 2013, 87, 1129–1146.

  • Thevathasan, N. V. and Gordon, A. M., Poplar leaf biomass distribution and nitrogen dynamics in a poplar–barley intercropped system in southern Ontario, Canada. Agrofor. Syst., 1997, 37(1), 79–90.

  • Yadav, R. P., Bisht, J. K. and Bhatt, J. C., Biomass, carbon stock under different production systems in the mid-hills of Indian Himalaya. Trop. Ecol., 2017, 58(1), 15–21.

  • Wani, N., Velmurugan, A. and Dadhwal, V. K., Assessment of agricultural crop and soil carbon pools in Madhya Pradesh, India. Trop. Ecol., 2010, 51, 11–19.

  • Kaul, M., Mohren, G. M. J. and Dadhwal, V. K., Carbon storage and sequestration potential of selected tree species in India. Mitig. Adapt. Strat. Global Climate Change, 2013, 15, 489–510.

  • Nair, P. K. R. and Garrity, D., Agroforestry research and development: the way forward. In Agroforestry – The Future of Global Land Use (eds Nair, P. K. R. and Garrity, D.), Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2012, pp. 515–531.

  • Gera, M., Mohan, G., Bisht, N. S. and Gera, N., Carbon sequestration potential of agroforestry under CDM in Punjab state of India. Indian J. For., 2011, 34, 1–10.

  • Schmidt, M. W. I. et al., Persistence of soil organic matter as an ecosystem property. Nature, 2011, 478, 49–56.

  • Torn, M. S., Swanston, C. W., Castanha, C. and Trumbore, S. E., Storage and turnover of natural organic matter in soil. In BiophysicoChemical Processes Involving Natural Nonliving Organic Matter in Environmental Systems (eds Senesi, N., Xing, B. and Huang, P. M.), Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2009, pp. 219–272.

  • Lal, R., Soil carbon sequestration in natural and managed tropical forest ecosystems. J. Sustain. For., 2005, 21, 1–30.

  • Gentile, R., Vanlauwe, B. and Six, J., Litter quality impacts shortbut not long-term soil carbon dynamics in soil aggregate fractions. Ecol. Appl., 2011, 21, 695–703.

  • Shi, S., Zhang, W., Zhang, P., Yu, Y. and Ding, F., A synthesis of change in deep soil organic carbon stores with afforestation of agricultural soils. For. Ecol. Manage., 2013, 296, 53–63.

  • Lorenz, K. and Lal, R., Carbon Sequestration in Forest Ecosystems, Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2010.

  • Kell, D. B., Large-scale sequestration of atmospheric carbon via plant ischolar_mains in natural and agricultural ecosystems: why and how.Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, Ser. B., 2012, 367, 1589–1597.

  • Laganière, J., Angers, D. and Paré, D., Carbon accumulation in agricultural soils after afforestation: a meta-analysis. Global Change Biol., 2010, 16, 439–453.


Abstract Views: 442

PDF Views: 137




  • Biomass Accumulation and Carbon Stock in Different Agroforestry Systems Prevalent in the Himalayan Foothills, India

Abstract Views: 442  |  PDF Views: 137

Authors

Amit Kumar
Forest Research Institute, Dehradun 248 006, India
Salil Tewari
G. B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar 263 145, India
Hukum Singh
Forest Research Institute, Dehradun 248 006, India
Parmanand Kumar
Forest Research Institute, Dehradun 248 006, India
Narendra Kumar
Forest Research Institute, Dehradun 248 006, India
Sarita Bisht
Forest Research Institute, Dehradun 248 006, India
Suruchi Devi
Forest Research Institute, Dehradun 248 006, India
Nidhi
Forest Research Institute, Dehradun 248 006, India
Rajesh Kaushal
ICAR-Indian Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Dehradun 248 001, India

Abstract


Agroforestry has great potential for carbon (C) sequestration among different land uses of the Himalayan region, India. However, our knowledge of C sequestration in particular, agroforestry system around the world is poor. Therefore, we conducted a study to understand biomass accumulation and carbon allocation in different components of the agroforestry system. The highest stem biomass was recorded in Eucalyptus tereticornis (69.43 ± 0.90 Mg ha–1), branch biomass in Populus deltoids (5.04 ± 0.35 Mg ha–1), leaf biomass also in P. deltoids (2.21 ± 0.12 Mg ha–1), and ischolar_main biomass in Albizia procera (14.01 ± 0.44 Mg ha–1). The highest (81.01%) C allocation was recorded in the stem of Toona ciliate, branch of P. deltoids (5.73%), leaves of E. tereticornis (2.93%) and ischolar_main of Anthocephalus cadamba (16.83%). The highest CO2< mitigation (160.5 ± 2.55 Mg CO2 ha–1) and C sequestration (45.33 ± 0.60 Mg ha–1) were recorded in E. tereticornis. The highest wheat crop biomass (11.85 ± 0.23 Mg ha–1) and C stock (3.59 ± 0.05 Mg ha–1) were recorded in P. deltiodes. However, soil carbon stock was recorded in E. tereticornis (37.5 ± 3.52 Mg ha–1). Thus, trees on farmlands with crops are suitable for biomass production and C allocation in different components under changing climatic scenarios.

Keywords


Agroforestry System, Biomass, Carbon Stock, Carbon Dioxide Mitigation, Climate Change.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv120%2Fi6%2F1083-1088