Open Access
Subscription Access
Innovation Barriers and a Possibility Kaleidoscope: The NEP Imperative
In the context of research and innovation objectives of National Education Policy (NEP), this note elicits five innovation barriers prevailing in the higher education institutions in India and presents an innovation possibility matrix based on two dimensions of resources (lightweight versus resource-intensive) and openness (open versus closed). At the policy level, this approach helps as a lens for informed resource allocation that is balanced across different institutions and kinds of innovations. At the institution level, it helps us understand what kind of innovation direction can institutions take in different projects, the gaps to be filled and capabilities to be built.
Keywords
No Keywords.
User
Font Size
Information
- Berkun, S., The Myths of Innovation, O’Reilly, Canada, 2010, p. 54.
- Christensen, C. M., Using aggregate project planning to link strategy, innovation, and the resource allocation process, Harvard Business School Background Note, USA, 2000, pp. 301–041.
- GoI, National Education Policy 2020, Ministry of Education, Government of India, 2020, p. 45; https://www.education.gov.in/sites/upload_files/mhrd/files/nep/NEP_Final_English.pdf (retrieved on 5 November 2021).
- Townsend, A., The future of lightweight innovation, Institute for the future, Palo Alto, CA, 2009, pp. 3–7.
- Bhaduri, S., Curr. Sci., 2017, 113(1), 18–20.
- Dyer, J. H., Gregersen, H. B. and Clayton, M. C., Harvard Bus. Rev., 2009, 87(12), 60–67.
- Cancino, C. A., Merigó, J. M. and Coronado, F. C., Curr. Sci., 2017, 113(8), 1507–1518.
Abstract Views: 340
PDF Views: 116