The PDF file you selected should load here if your Web browser has a PDF reader plug-in installed (for example, a recent version of Adobe Acrobat Reader).

If you would like more information about how to print, save, and work with PDFs, Highwire Press provides a helpful Frequently Asked Questions about PDFs.

Alternatively, you can download the PDF file directly to your computer, from where it can be opened using a PDF reader. To download the PDF, click the Download link above.

Fullscreen Fullscreen Off


Dispersing coal dust to a safe level near the mining face is of utmost importance for maintaining a safe and healthy workplace environment in any mine. The huge amount of coal dust generated during coal winning near a mine development heading is generally dispersed through auxiliary ventilation systems. In this study, dispersion of coal dust in a continuous miner development heading was analysed with five different auxiliary ventilation systems through computational fluid dynamics simulations, and their efficacy of dust dispersal to a safe level was compared. The dust concentration in the heading developed by continuous miner was monitored by a Grimm aerosol spectrometer. The k–e turbulence model was used to perform 3D computational simulations utilizing real mine data. This study provided an insight into the dispersion behaviour of coal dust in the development heading with diverse auxiliary ventilation systems. The line brattice system proved to be the most effective means of dust dispersion. Nonetheless, better dispersion of coal dust in the development heading was achieved at line brattice distances of 0.75 and 1.0 m from the side wall.

Keywords

Auxiliary ventilation systems, coal dust, computational simulation, development headings, dispersion, line brattice, underground coal mines.
User
Notifications
Font Size